- Joined
- Aug 16, 2013
- Messages
- 19,192
- Reaction score
- 18,166
The summer of 98When did you play rugby old chap?
The summer of 98When did you play rugby old chap?
Our forum's very own @lsa played rugby as a kid and now he can't read or write. I'm not surprised by this study.
The summer of 98
Yes. Yes I have. I'm dealing with someone at present in my life. In fact dementia/alzhiemers is being dubbed as type 3 diabetes. So perhaps more effort should go into correct information on diet and lifestyle (accurate info) rather than trying to wrap children in cotton wool for physical sports.Care is needed. You ever dealt with someone with severe CTE or dementia? Its not pretty. This isnt just philosophy on toughness or not.
Me and some guys from school
Had a band and we tried real hard
Jimmy quit and Jody got married
I should've known we'd never get far
Oh, when I look back now
That summer seemed to last forever
And if I had the choice
Yeah, I'd always wanna be there
Those were the best days of my life
Are you sure, bro?I think that's baseball old boy
You're very wrong.I'd give this more weight if it was Anerican football. Kids slamming into each other at full speed eith crash helmets on, plenty of concussions. Rugby has significantly less traumatic brain injury. Boxing it's all about managing the intensity of the impacts. My students spar 3 times a week, but its not all-out wars and we do sparring exercises where the head isnt hit (body only) routinely.
Also the comparison between hitting a child outside a Sport being abuse, thus hitting them inside a Sport should also be abuse is a massive false equivalency. Are we talking about adults hitting them or other kids hitting them? There needs to be a distinction there.
Its definitely not a "safe" environment though, because of risk factors. However if we go by risk and statistics there literally isnt anywhere safe.
I'm not sure about those stats. Guys with helmets position their heads in such a way they are hitting even harder. The entire body jolt causes the brain shake to occur.You're very wrong.
Rugby is way tougher and more dangerous than the watered down version called American Football wearing full body armour, as any study you care to look at has shown that Rugby has far more brain injuries. They even have helmets on to protect against concussions for fucks sake which is not a bad thing.
Football with the dancing fairies in the background will be fine but doing it with no protection is always dangerous, more so as a child.
Idk, the guy seemed to make some decent points. If I had kids, I wouldn’t put them in football or rugby. Not until they’re in high school at least.
But calling it child abuse is a bit of a stretch.
It's becoming very prevalent nowadays sadly for the crop that's retired past decade. Took our rugby competitions a long time to get the level of professionalism seen in the nfl.I'm not sure about those stats. Guys with helmets position their heads in such a way they are hitting even harder. The entire body jolt causes the brain shake to occur.
Plus a lot of the US athletes are bigger (rugby union and rugby league require more ongoing running with less breaks which tends to lend itself to smaller/leaner athletes). Some of the NFL guys are fucking huge and sprint and hit well. Its even more force.
Australian rules football requires even more running and results in leaner athletes again.
I don't follow rugby union or rugby league any more but I'm not aware of an endemic of CTE here (not saying its not happening but I'm not hearing it).
Plus the game has been gayed up with the banning of vaguely head high tackles and shoulder charges that would have caused much of that damage.
I do hear the NFL is riddled with it however.
It has been an ongoing joke/accusation levelled at rugby players since the 80s at least but I'm not seeing much of it.
Maybe other Ozzie or Britsh posters know different.
Ok sounds like my theory is wrong. Have you got any names for rugby players with cte?It's becoming very prevalent nowadays sadly for the crop that's retired past decade. Took our rugby competitions a long time to get the level of professionalism seen in the nfl.
( rugby)
20 years ago the games were substitution. Not interchange. Iirc union was 3 a game. League 4. You generally required not just athletes but a special kind of cardio/ toughness. No point being fast if you couldn't last a game. Ditto big.
Hence the absolutely dramatic size and speed increases the past decade. Now we're catching up with cte that's come with the increased forces from massive guys moving quickly.
There's a reason all the protocols have been introduced recently. You can take a bigger head knock in soccer than rugby and stay on the field now. Because mandatory head injury assessment by independent medics now.
Funny thing about the nfl is the running backs and wide receivers ( those who seem to run the ball the most ) have a average size of
RB- Avg. Height: 70.73 in Avg. Weight: 214.48 lbs
WR- Avg. Height: 72.40 in Avg. Weight: 200.32 lb
6 foot 97kg isn't particularly a large guy.... definitely not in rugby . Nor afl actually .
The real giants in the nfl are generally pretty static. There's no run up for the collision. ( not saying it doesn't happen ) but for the majority its not 30 -40 tackles being made along with being tackled ten or so times with momentum. The amount of collisions in rugby definitely makes it pretty prone to cte. Ditto afl
For instance Jordan mailata a defensive tackle at Philadelphia former under 20s rugby league player 6'8 365lbs ( 166kg ) would be dealing with far less impact in his position in nfl than league.
Ok sounds like my theory is wrong. Have you got any names for rugby players with cte?
Yes. Yes I have. I'm dealing with someone at present in my life. In fact dementia/alzhiemers is being dubbed as type 3 diabetes. So perhaps more effort should go into correct information on diet and lifestyle (accurate info) rather than trying to wrap children in cotton wool for physical sports.
I can't find the clip but some years back Kostya Tszyu got into a debate about the age of children being allowed to compete in amatuer boxing being raised considerably. He was against it stating children can learn defence and make mistakes whilst young when they are not hitting each other as hard hence taking less damage. As opposed to someone starting amatuer bouts as a much more developed teen or adult, making mistakes etc and racking up considerably more damage whilst trying to learn as their opponents hit much harder as they are stronger. The argument has some merit.
The tl/dr is learning contact sports later in life can mean more damage due to beginner mistakes/lessons that could have been learned as a child with less damage.
I agree that care is needed however.
You're very wrong.
Rugby is way tougher and more dangerous than the watered down version called American Football wearing full body armour, as any study you care to look at has shown that Rugby has far more brain injuries. They even have helmets on to protect against concussions for fucks sake which is not a bad thing.
Football with the dancing fairies in the background will be fine but doing it with no protection is always dangerous, more so as a child.
Well if rebirth is true they did in fact choose itJust having children is a form of child abuse. They didnt consent to be born.
Studies are generally supporting that Rugby is more dangerous and has a higher chance of injury including concussions as one would expect. There are some areas where football can cause more severe injuries due to the higher impact but as one would expect, no headgear is always going to be more dangerous than wearing helmets just like pro boxing is more dangerous than amateur.The helmets in American football do very little to protect against concussions in the same sense that boxing headgear does pretty much nothing to prevent concussions either. In both cases the mouthpiece does a lot more. Being able to collide heads directly is going to have an increased risk for both players, on top of the crashing to the ground.
And no, data is all over the place on this. I've seen studies with Rugby at the top, American football at the top, and some with ice hockey at the top. There are also very different metrics used for assessments, some studies base conclusions on emergency room visits, some on long-term medical data of players, and there are variables such as accounting for time on the field, which rugby players have significantly more.
I don't really care which sport is "tougher"...what I care about is that athletes can have some modicum of playing or competing and having quality of life after.