It's a good thing Sherdog has someone like you here to regulate childish behavior.
Yeah, I guess the conversation where you claimed no one had said something worse than what Roseanne said and not been fired never happened.
Yeah, because everyone wants to see a poor white family of SJWs....
Being a bit cheeky, but this appeals to maybe 3% of the population. It willl have a good first, and maybe second episode. Then the novelty will be gone, and the ratings will crumble.
True, but it's because of name recognition though. Not because of the concept.Well, in fairness, the Roseanne revival did do very well in the ratings and obviously had all of those elements.
She said this chick looked like this...
There is a resemblance. lol
If Roseanne meant this to be a 1 to 1 comparison, and there was no racial compenent to her thought process, then it was not a racist comment. There is no chance of convincing left-wing individuals who use charges of racism as a means to control people that this is possible though.
That comparison was her intention though. And, you want to see people saying much worse and not getting fired for it? Go watch a Comedy Central Roast. Any of them...
That is what she stated was her intention.
Not at all. You're the one reaching. Because the people on those shows were there voluntarily that means the participants can say absolutely anything they want? Anything? I don't follow your logic at all.
You wish.
It was racist...horribly so..
It was fairly obvious this was going to happen. The only thing to see now is whether the audience accepts or rejects the series without Barr.
I'll watch it, in fact I think it will be better without Roseanne, who was pretty weak this season.
I really like Goodman, and if Chalke is still going to be on it, sign me up.
Arguing that Roseanne was specifically comparing Valerie Jarret to that character from the 2001 version of Planet of the Apes is what got Shadow Priest run out of town for being outed as a Grand Wizard.
At no point did Roseanne ever say that’s what she meant by the comment, that specific comparison is just something people defending her jumped to after the fact to try and excuse her comment. If by some chance she really did mean that she looks like that character then her comment maybe Iess egregious, because they actually do look similar. However, many people are justifiably sceptical at that explanation, because that’s a super obscure reference. Unlike the 60s original or the recent trilogy very few people liked the 2001 version, so referring to it in 2018 would be super random and obscure. Especially by a 65 year old while supposedly fucked up on too much ambien. That’s why few people are buying that explanation, especially since Roseanne herself never provided that as her explanation.
Only Roseanne knows her intentions for certain, but looking at the images, I can certainly see the case for a one to one comparison there...
lol @ conservatives rushing to her defense.
do they not remember when she botched/mocked the national anthem, and at the end, spit on the ground and grabbed her imaginary (or maybe not) nut sack?
that shit was much more disrespectful than kneeling or sitting quietly during the anthem.