Its common knowledge that the UFC and Rory's camp have not come to terms on a new deal, and clearly Rory has not been happy with the position that the UFC has taken in these talks.
Rory is 18-3, with his 3 losses to:
1. Carlos Condit in a 3 round war against former interim WW champion where he was arguably winning until Condit pulled a KO in the last 7 seconds of the fight;
2. Robbie Lawler in a split decision 3 round war that might have been edged in Robbie's favour with a 3rd round knockdown, otherwise Rory was winning in the eyes of a lot of people; and
3. Robbie Lawler in that 5 round war for the WW championship we saw last July. He was arguably winning that fight going into the 5th by some as well.
Whether you agree that Rory was winning or losing doesn't matter - the point is that Rory is right there against the two best in the division and is elite of the elite. He has wins against Saffediene, Woodley, Maia, Ellenberger, Penn, and Nate Diaz and he's younger than all of the top fighters in the division.
Surely the Red King is going to be a very good PPV draw, if not a great PPV draw in future fights, particularly if he rematches either Condit or Lawler so he's got to be worthy of a PPV cut as a main or co-main going forward.
And being from Tristar with a training partner and brother such as GSP, he won't be lacking in knowledge for what a fighter's value is to the UFC. He won't be delusional nor will he be naive and gullible.
So my question is: what could the UFC and Rory be in disagreement of? How could they be so far apart in negotiations? Surely its just a matter of:
a) does he or does he not get a PPV cut as a main/co-main?
b) show and win money?
c) other perks?
How can they be so far apart? The real big money is in the PPV cut - surely whatever difference they have in the show and win money can't be so far apart that it can't be settled. So I can only assume that Rory's camp think he should be getting PPV cuts and the UFC doesn't?
Is this the issue, and if so do you think that Rory deserves main/co-main status and a PPV cut?
Rory is 18-3, with his 3 losses to:
1. Carlos Condit in a 3 round war against former interim WW champion where he was arguably winning until Condit pulled a KO in the last 7 seconds of the fight;
2. Robbie Lawler in a split decision 3 round war that might have been edged in Robbie's favour with a 3rd round knockdown, otherwise Rory was winning in the eyes of a lot of people; and
3. Robbie Lawler in that 5 round war for the WW championship we saw last July. He was arguably winning that fight going into the 5th by some as well.
Whether you agree that Rory was winning or losing doesn't matter - the point is that Rory is right there against the two best in the division and is elite of the elite. He has wins against Saffediene, Woodley, Maia, Ellenberger, Penn, and Nate Diaz and he's younger than all of the top fighters in the division.
Surely the Red King is going to be a very good PPV draw, if not a great PPV draw in future fights, particularly if he rematches either Condit or Lawler so he's got to be worthy of a PPV cut as a main or co-main going forward.
And being from Tristar with a training partner and brother such as GSP, he won't be lacking in knowledge for what a fighter's value is to the UFC. He won't be delusional nor will he be naive and gullible.
So my question is: what could the UFC and Rory be in disagreement of? How could they be so far apart in negotiations? Surely its just a matter of:
a) does he or does he not get a PPV cut as a main/co-main?
b) show and win money?
c) other perks?
How can they be so far apart? The real big money is in the PPV cut - surely whatever difference they have in the show and win money can't be so far apart that it can't be settled. So I can only assume that Rory's camp think he should be getting PPV cuts and the UFC doesn't?
Is this the issue, and if so do you think that Rory deserves main/co-main status and a PPV cut?