- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 3,773
- Reaction score
- 0
Needed editing. Started out decent and fizzled. 5/10. Right idea for Lamas, poor execution.
Insecure and butthurt? Your spamming Ricardo bless all over the forum like you think its funny. I'm just telling you it's not. Because it isn't.
Needed editing. Started out decent and fizzled. 5/10. Right idea for Lamas, poor execution.
Nope its bc you are butthurt and insecure. Ricardo Bless. Oh also I am not in the least interested in your opinion about humor. I'd also refuse to debate an Neanderthal on boolean algebra.
I agree - from a professional POV. But coming in and expecting another fighter trying to hype himself up by saying sth. like 'I'd beat Conors ass' I was pretty much blown away.
Also Ricardo Bless.
Boolean algebra?
It's just breaking down components of logical statements.
boolean x
boolean y
if(x == true)
then y = false;
...and so on, until all the variables are broken down into math. You'd examine an argument just by its structure.
It's convenient for formal fallacies.
Are you Ricardo Lamas' cousin or something? Because it appears that way with the way you're sticking to that corny Ricardo bless schtick.
Boolean algebra? I don't know what that is but I scored a perfect score on my math SAT and a 5 on my AP calculus exam many moons ago, so I'm willing to bet my algebra is better than yours.
Shit video.
Riucardo Bless.
Translation: I don't know what that is but I am sure I am better at it then you. lol. Same goes for humor as far as you are concerned.
It's just breaking down components of logical statements.
boolean x
boolean y
if(x == true)
then y = false;
...and so on, until all the variables are broken down into math. You'd examine an argument just by its structure.
It's convenient for formal fallacies.
I'm smarter than you bro. It's okay.
Not wrong but highly incomplete.
I doubt that. However I am not talking about intelligence but a sense of humor. I might discuss boolean algebra with you - however discussing humor with you is obviously futile ( or about the same as discussing boolean algebra with a neanderthal ).
(when I think of it the fact that you think I was talking about your intelligence makes me doubt your statement - at least you suck at reading comprehension)
Ricardo Bless.
You called me a neanderthal in effect insulting my intelligence.
Oh also I am not in the least interested in your opinion about humor. I'd also refuse to debate an Neanderthal on boolean algebra.
So yeah, you were talking about intelligence. Smart guy.
And Ricardo can bless my nuts.
I was just explaining that it's a tool that can be used to turn statements or a flow of statements into math so that it/they can be examined by structure because of how you introduced the topic to him ("I'd also refuse to debate an Neanderthal on boolean algebra"). In the context of a debate, I gave an example of how it may be harnessed.
I'm sure you have a better definition, though.