• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Rewatched Conor v Diaz: What I learnt...

LukeSkyRutten

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
2,679
Reaction score
0
Having originally watched Conor v Diaz in a Sydney bar alongside hundreds of loud, drunken Irishman, during my live viewing there was definitely a lot of things I missed [And judging by many of the threads on the fight, I think most people would benefit from a rewatch as well. So I'll list my misconceptions I had while watching the fight live:

1.) I thought Conor dominated the first. The reality: He didn't. He was struggling to find his range throughout the entire first round. At the three minute mark through to the four minute mark he landed heavy, and did just enough to win the round.

2.) I thought Diaz was wobbled in the first: At no stage in the first was Diaz ever rocked. Watching live, the blood made Diaz appear to be in more trouble than he ever was. In fact, if you watch the round as a whole, Conor 'just' edged it… Only just.

3.) I thought the second round was all Diaz. I was wrong. For the first two minutes in the second Conor landed heavy. Far heavier than in the first. In fact, I believe this was the biggest turning point, he landed huge shots for two straight minutes that might have hurt Diaz, but they didn't come close to putting him away…

4.) I thought Diaz rocked Conor leading to the gassing. I was wrong. It was the other way around. Conor visibly drained himself after trying to finish Diaz in the first two minutes. From that point onwards, he was flat footed, lacked movement, and gave up the distance control. From there it was game over… Had it gone on longer Conor would have been stopped via strikes.

Small things I picked up [That I didn't originally]:

While a full camp will help Diaz, it will also help Conor. Anyone who has read my posts will see that I've been giving Conor a lot of shit. That being said, for all the Conor fans out there, it was clear that he had no game plan for Diaz. To elaborate:

- Conor used very little teeps to the body, instead opting for high energy, head hunting shots.

- From the opening second, you can tell he had no plan on closing the distance. He was 'lunging' much like Aldo 'lunged' in their title fight.

- Kavanaugh gave some terrible coaching. At the end of the first, he said: "The right uppercut is there"… This lead to Conor using an extreme amount of energy to push for a low probability shot… It didn't pay off. Instead he should have advised him to maintain distance with the teeps [Especially with the knowledge that nobody finishes Nate Diaz]. I'm not a coach, and no doubt Kavanaugh has greater knowledge of the sport, but that line baffled me.

The TLDR: Obviously there will be a rematch somewhere down the line. If Conor brings his current game plan he is going to lose 10/10 times [He was never really in control - Which was my initial thoughts watching live]. To beat Nate he needs to take a lesson from Anderson Silva. Control distance, minimise energy output, check your ego and understand that you probably won't put Nate away and prioritise shot selection. Originally I didn't think Conor would have much hope in a rematch, but he does have the tools, he just needs to implement them.

Anyway… That is all.
 
migrane_always_sunny.gif
 
Having originally watched Conor v Diaz in a Sydney bar alongside hundreds of loud, drunken Irishman, during my live viewing there was definitely a lot of things I missed [And judging by many of the threads on the fight, I think most people would benefit from a rewatch as well. So I'll list my misconceptions I had while watching the fight live:

1.) I thought Conor dominated the first. The reality: He didn't. He was struggling to find his range throughout the entire first round. At the three minute mark through to the four minute mark he landed heavy, and did just enough to win the round.

2.) I thought Diaz was wobbled in the first: At no stage in the first was Diaz ever rocked. Watching live, the blood made Diaz appear to be in more trouble than he ever was. In fact, if you watch the round as a whole, Conor 'just' edged it… Only just.

Glad im not the only on who noticed that after a rewatch
 
Nate was letting connor chase him around and was landing some good jabs and hooks/slaps while connor was constantly reaching. Blood and Gregor crowd made it seem like connor was doing more damage than he was.
 
tl;dr taking time out of his busy schedule of destroying the feminist agenda to post on sherdoggy.
teal_deer_by_matheusrosa94-d30bu6u.jpg
 
Conor bought into his own striking power hype.
 
Having originally watched Conor v Diaz in a Sydney bar alongside hundreds of loud, drunken Irishman, during my live viewing there was definitely a lot of things I missed [And judging by many of the threads on the fight, I think most people would benefit from a rewatch as well. So I'll list my misconceptions I had while watching the fight live:

1.) I thought Conor dominated the first. The reality: He didn't. He was struggling to find his range throughout the entire first round. At the three minute mark through to the four minute mark he landed heavy, and did just enough to win the round.

2.) I thought Diaz was wobbled in the first: At no stage in the first was Diaz ever rocked. Watching live, the blood made Diaz appear to be in more trouble than he ever was. In fact, if you watch the round as a whole, Conor 'just' edged it… Only just.

3.) I thought the second round was all Diaz. I was wrong. For the first two minutes in the second Conor landed heavy. Far heavier than in the first. In fact, I believe this was the biggest turning point, he landed huge shots for two straight minutes that might have hurt Diaz, but they didn't come close to putting him away…

4.) I thought Diaz rocked Conor leading to the gassing. I was wrong. It was the other way around. Conor visibly drained himself after trying to finish Diaz in the first two minutes. From that point onwards, he was flat footed, lacked movement, and gave up the distance control. From there it was game over… Had it gone on longer Conor would have been stopped via strikes.

Small things I picked up [That I didn't originally]:

While a full camp will help Diaz, it will also help Conor. Anyone who has read my posts will see that I've been giving Conor a lot of shit. That being said, for all the Conor fans out there, it was clear that he had no game plan for Diaz. To elaborate:

- Conor used very little teeps to the body, instead opting for high energy, head hunting shots.

- From the opening second, you can tell he had no plan on closing the distance. He was 'lunging' much like Aldo 'lunged' in their title fight.

- Kavanaugh gave some terrible coaching. At the end of the first, he said: "The right uppercut is there"… This lead to Conor using an extreme amount of energy to push for a low probability shot… It didn't pay off. Instead he should have advised him to maintain distance with the teeps [Especially with the knowledge that nobody finishes Nate Diaz]. I'm not a coach, and no doubt Kavanaugh has greater knowledge of the sport, but that line baffled me.

The TLDR: Obviously there will be a rematch somewhere down the line. If Conor brings his current game plan he is going to lose 10/10 times [He was never really in control - Which was my initial thoughts watching live]. To beat Nate he needs to take a lesson from Anderson Silva. Control distance, minimise energy output, check your ego and understand that you probably won't put Nate away and prioritise shot selection. Originally I didn't think Conor would have much hope in a rematch, but he does have the tools, he just needs to implement them.

Anyway… That is all.
A for effort. Very interesting perspective.
 
I re-watched the fight twice. I thought Conor was winning up until the middle of the second round. Conor just gassed and Nate started to hurt him.

I don't think Conor wins in a rematch either at any weight.
 
Claims to have been giving Conor shit yet has Conor as his AV?
 
Having originally watched Conor v Diaz in a Sydney bar alongside hundreds of loud, drunken Irishman, during my live viewing there was definitely a lot of things I missed [And judging by many of the threads on the fight, I think most people would benefit from a rewatch as well. So I'll list my misconceptions I had while watching the fight live:

1.) I thought Conor dominated the first. The reality: He didn't. He was struggling to find his range throughout the entire first round. At the three minute mark through to the four minute mark he landed heavy, and did just enough to win the round.

2.) I thought Diaz was wobbled in the first: At no stage in the first was Diaz ever rocked. Watching live, the blood made Diaz appear to be in more trouble than he ever was. In fact, if you watch the round as a whole, Conor 'just' edged it… Only just.

3.) I thought the second round was all Diaz. I was wrong. For the first two minutes in the second Conor landed heavy. Far heavier than in the first. In fact, I believe this was the biggest turning point, he landed huge shots for two straight minutes that might have hurt Diaz, but they didn't come close to putting him away…

4.) I thought Diaz rocked Conor leading to the gassing. I was wrong. It was the other way around. Conor visibly drained himself after trying to finish Diaz in the first two minutes. From that point onwards, he was flat footed, lacked movement, and gave up the distance control. From there it was game over… Had it gone on longer Conor would have been stopped via strikes.

Small things I picked up [That I didn't originally]:

While a full camp will help Diaz, it will also help Conor. Anyone who has read my posts will see that I've been giving Conor a lot of shit. That being said, for all the Conor fans out there, it was clear that he had no game plan for Diaz. To elaborate:

- Conor used very little teeps to the body, instead opting for high energy, head hunting shots.

- From the opening second, you can tell he had no plan on closing the distance. He was 'lunging' much like Aldo 'lunged' in their title fight.

- Kavanaugh gave some terrible coaching. At the end of the first, he said: "The right uppercut is there"… This lead to Conor using an extreme amount of energy to push for a low probability shot… It didn't pay off. Instead he should have advised him to maintain distance with the teeps [Especially with the knowledge that nobody finishes Nate Diaz]. I'm not a coach, and no doubt Kavanaugh has greater knowledge of the sport, but that line baffled me.

The TLDR: Obviously there will be a rematch somewhere down the line. If Conor brings his current game plan he is going to lose 10/10 times [He was never really in control - Which was my initial thoughts watching live]. To beat Nate he needs to take a lesson from Anderson Silva. Control distance, minimise energy output, check your ego and understand that you probably won't put Nate away and prioritise shot selection. Originally I didn't think Conor would have much hope in a rematch, but he does have the tools, he just needs to implement them.

Anyway… That is all.
good post.
 
I agree with a lot of your analysis, but you shouldn't be so confident in your conclusion.
 
Claims to have been giving Conor shit yet has Conor as his AV?
I like Conor. I went off him since he started talking bullshit about bigger fighters, disrespecting past greats and listening to the ridiculous hyperbole of Sherdog. In fact, I he almost lost me as a fan, until his latest humble pie. We'll see what he does with it.
 
Conor McGregor will NEVER fight like that. It's not in his nature to be a low output counter puncher.
 
Conor had a full camp training for RDA for fuck sake... Don't try and make it sound like he had a disadvantage like Diaz.
 
Back
Top