• Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.

Social Republican Investigations (Biden Crime Family Presser)

LOL in another interview since Tucker, he is saying he is unaware of the Qanon shaman?!? “I don’t even know if this person we showed and mentioned multiple times!

The Mississippi Democrat and former committee chairman also claimed he was unaware of Jan. 6 defendant Jacob Chansley, the “Q-Anon Shaman” who was sentenced to almost four years in prison.

“I don’t know who he is,” Mr. Thompson said of Mr. Chansley, the protester best known for wearing a fur-horned helmet, exposing his tattooed bare chest and wearing face paint

https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/7/bennie-thompson-jan-6-committee-chairman-denies-pa/

for reference, here he is being directly shown by the committee lolll, maybe Bennie fell asleep or was too busy writing another statement/speech about racism, which is all he ever does

 
<1>

Conspiracy theories[edit]
In the January 2013 issue of The Atlantic, law and business professor Mark Nuckols wrote: "In her various books, articles, and public speeches, Wolf has demonstrated recurring disregard for the historical record and consistently mutilated the truth with selective and ultimately deceptive use of her sources." He further stated: "[W]hen she distorts facts to advance her political agenda, she dishonors the victims of history and poisons present-day public discourse about issues of vital importance to a free society." Nuckols argued that Wolf "has for many years now been claiming that a fascist coup in America is imminent… n The Guardian she alleged, with no substantiation, that the U.S. government and big American banks are conspiring to impose a 'totally integrated corporate-state repression of dissent'."[70]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wolf
“Some dude said”….
<Grimes01>
all after the patriot act and 2008 bailouts and since then Snowden, Covid, etc…
“The historical record”.
 
Beware, there is an incoming horde of:

26b250a738ea4abc7a5af4d42ad93af0.jpg


Partisan immune system - GO!

if republicans were smart, doubtful, they should now call Bennie to testify before oversight committee in this. He now has multiple public statements over last few days that indicate the committee might not been as thorough as the once said

edit: and I don’t expect the reps themselves to have reviewed all the footage, but to say no access? Lol wtf
 
Has any other networks been provided the tapes or is 5 minutes of Lyin Tucks edit all going to be provided by any network.
No one of Lyin Tucks supporters have been able to explain if Jan 6th is a nuthinburger, why was Fox News host, House Majority Leader McCarthy and Don Jr panic tweeting each other on that day.
The tweets can be seen by you fools that Tuck is playing or you can go to rando conspiracy theorist to confirm your bias. Can’t wait to call you dumb again. I Thought after the election fraud BS you Rubes would have learned you lesson but I guess you ain’t too bright or too pot committed by now. I think a few of you are trolling, pretending to be this naive.
 
Getting humiliated in one Jan 6th thread apparently isn't enough for you so you went ahead and started another?
did @cottagecheesefan change the name of the thread to some gibberish or is he unhinged spaz posting for the 800th time since the 2020 election?
 
For those wondering why the footage was given to Fox News, we wouldn't have had this footage highlighted otherwise. This evidence changes a lot about what happened, but it will not change the minds of those on the left who believe they saw all they needed with the political theater that was the January 6th hearings.

I honestly can’t fathom how people can watch videos of cops being attacked and people breaking windows and doors and claim that it was a peaceful protest. It simply boggles my mind. It’s the equivalent of people saying that the BLM protests were peaceful.
 
I honestly can’t fathom how people can watch videos of cops being attacked and people breaking windows and doors and claim that it was a peaceful protest. It simply boggles my mind. It’s the equivalent of people saying that the BLM protests were peaceful.

it was fiery but mostly peaceful.
 
Pence says Trump ‘endangered my family’ on Jan. 6

08VPFASH-Pence-fly-mediumSquareAt3X.jpg


WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Vice President Mike Pence on Saturday harshly criticized former President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, widening the rift between the two men as they prepare to battle over the Republican nomination in next year’s election.

“President Trump was wrong,” Pence said during remarks at the annual white-tie Gridiron Dinner attended by politicians and journalists. “I had no right to overturn the election. And his reckless words endangered my family and everyone at the Capitol that day, and I know history will hold Donald Trump accountable.”

Pence’s remarks were the sharpest condemnation yet from the once-loyal lieutenant who has often shied away from confronting his former boss. Trump has already declared his candidacy. Pence has not, but he’s been laying the groundwork to run.

In the days leading up to Jan. 6, 2021, Trump pressured Pence to overturn President Joe Biden’s election victory as he presided over the ceremonial certification of the results. Pence refused, and when rioters stormed the Capitol, some chanted that they wanted to “hang Mike Pence.”

The House committee that investigated the attack said in its final report that “the President of the United States had riled up a mob that hunted his own Vice President.”

With his remarks, Pence solidified his place in a broader debate within the Republican Party over how to view the attack. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, for example, recently provided Tucker Carlson with an archive of security camera footage from Jan. 6, which the Fox News host has used to downplay the day’s events and promote conspiracy theories.

“Make no mistake about it, what happened that day was a disgrace,” Pence said in his Gridiron Dinner remarks. “And it mocks decency to portray it any other way.”

Trump, meanwhile, has continued to spread lies about his election loss. He’s even spoken in support of the rioters and said he would consider pardoning them if he was reelected.

Speeches at the Gridiron Dinner are usually humorous affairs, where politicians poke fun at each other, and Pence did plenty of that as well.

He joked that Trump’s ego was so fragile, he wanted his vice president to sing “Wind Beneath My Wings” — one of the lines is “did you ever know that you’re my hero?” — during their weekly lunches.

He took another shot at Trump over classified documents.

“I read that some of those classified documents they found at Mar-a-Lago were actually stuck in the president’s Bible,” Pence said. “Which proves he had absolutely no idea they were there.”

https://apnews.com/article/pence-tr...riot-carlson-1e38cb44d55737031ca528b4f33aa1fb
 
Keep in mind the Proud Boys 1/6 trial hated over FBI trying to deleted evidence that was “classified” that they did not mean to share <45><45><45>

not right wing site, politico, and they call this the most important 1/6 trial. How much other classified info is not being charged? Just like the video footage?

this literally reads as the FBI/DOJ accidentally turned over evidence that shows that any actual potential agitators were entrapped by the FBI in addition to the Antifa shit?




Federal prosecutors inadvertently disclosed likely classified material to Proud Boys defense attorneys, Justice Department officials indicated Thursday, a snafu that has derailed — for at least a full day — the most important trial to emerge from the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The admission in court by a top DOJ official came in connection with testimony from FBI Special Agent Nicole Miller, one of the lead investigators in the Proud Boys case. Miller has already spent two days testifying about the Proud Boys’ Jan. 6 activities — their march to the Capitol from the Washington Monument and key role in the breaches that led to the broader attack.

Miller sent her final list to prosecutors, who then packaged the messages into an Excel spreadsheet that they provided to defense lawyers. But unbeknownst to them, the messages Miller initially filtered out — including some that DOJ officials say are likely classified — were left in the final document as “hidden” rows in the Excel spreadsheet. Defense counsel stumbled upon them and began grilling Miller about them in front of jurors in the case.

Overnight, Justice Department attorneys told the defense team they were concerned there had been a “spill” of classified information in the hidden messages they accessed. And on Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Tim Kelly paused the trial — already in its third month — to determine how to handle the error.
 
it was fiery but mostly peaceful.

Have not seen the video of the cop being pepper sprayed or the the cop being beaten with a flag pole or the cop having his stuff stolen as he was squeezed into a door? Breaking windows and doors is not peaceful either. Unless, of course your consider the BLM protests to be similarly fiery. I don’t.
 
Have not seen the video of the cop being pepper sprayed or the the cop being beaten with a flag pole or the cop having his stuff stolen as he was squeezed into a door? Breaking windows and doors is not peaceful either. Unless, of course your consider the BLM protests to be similarly fiery. I don’t.


maybe tucker will show it to you later on tonight and tell you what to think about it.
 
Last edited:
Keep in mind the Proud Boys 1/6 trial hated over FBI trying to deleted evidence that was “classified” that they did not mean to share <45><45><45>

not right wing site, politico, and they call this the most important 1/6 trial. How much other classified info is not being charged? Just like the video footage?

this literally reads as the FBI/DOJ accidentally turned over evidence that shows that any actual potential agitators were entrapped by the FBI in addition to the Antifa shit?




Federal prosecutors inadvertently disclosed likely classified material to Proud Boys defense attorneys, Justice Department officials indicated Thursday, a snafu that has derailed — for at least a full day — the most important trial to emerge from the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The admission in court by a top DOJ official came in connection with testimony from FBI Special Agent Nicole Miller, one of the lead investigators in the Proud Boys case. Miller has already spent two days testifying about the Proud Boys’ Jan. 6 activities — their march to the Capitol from the Washington Monument and key role in the breaches that led to the broader attack.

Miller sent her final list to prosecutors, who then packaged the messages into an Excel spreadsheet that they provided to defense lawyers. But unbeknownst to them, the messages Miller initially filtered out — including some that DOJ officials say are likely classified — were left in the final document as “hidden” rows in the Excel spreadsheet. Defense counsel stumbled upon them and began grilling Miller about them in front of jurors in the case.

Overnight, Justice Department attorneys told the defense team they were concerned there had been a “spill” of classified information in the hidden messages they accessed. And on Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Tim Kelly paused the trial — already in its third month — to determine how to handle the error.



it only disrupted their trial proceedings for a day. enjoy your nothingburger while you get to watch a bunch of proud boys get sentenced to prison and become pride boys just to own the libs. maybe one day they will find that evidence of that stolen election of yours. just not today teehee!

the party of law and order and personal accountability. blue lives matter. back the blue. maybe for your next facade you can pretend to be about human decency!
 
Last edited:
this literally reads as the FBI/DOJ accidentally turned over evidence that shows that any actual potential agitators were entrapped by the FBI

That's pretty weird then that not a single defendant tried to argue entrapment at their trials. I wonder why they didn't? Do you think it's because that argument would be completely retarded?

To argue entrapment, you'd have to say your defendant would not have committed said crime, except for the fact that the state force him to.....[insert elements of said crime]. So the idea that any of your precious insurrectionists could argue that they totally weren't going to break the law until they noticed there was a guy amongst 30,000 people who was a federal agent, at which point they had no choice but to enter the capital, is beyond dumb.

Look, we're just asking that you guys take 5 minutes to read up on the legal theories that you incorrectly state here. After all, if your goal is to push people to the alt-right (your own words) don't you think you'd have a better chance if your theories weren't something that gets immediately refuted?

Granted, some of the posters that bite are also guys that claim tuckers clips will result in mistrials (for already completed trials), so you're preaching to the short bus. Still, those posters that you're lying to would be better served if you fed them misinformation that actually stood up to scrutiny for longer than thirty seconds.
 
Look, we're just asking that you guys take 5 minutes to read up on the legal theories that you incorrectly state here.
You are asking too much.
After all, if your goal is to push people to the alt-right (your own words) don't you think you'd have a better chance if your theories weren't something that gets immediately refuted?
The alt-right’s alt-definition of “refuted” is “confirmed”.
 
and if she is out could be someone. Someone elected by the House of Representatives.

keep in mind Kamala has helped promote bail funds that have helped criminals commute insurrection

She supported a bail fund that curated eligibility, no one donating could know who would benefit.

Prohibitively expensive bail is unconstitutional and massively benefits the wealthy and punishes the poor.

If you disagree with any of these points please explain why, they should all be clearly self-evident.
 
She supported a bail fund that curated eligibility, no one donating could know who would benefit.

Prohibitively expensive bail is unconstitutional and massively benefits the wealthy and punishes the poor.

If you disagree with any of these points please explain why, they should all be clearly self-evident.


well at least cackling kamala is doing something to help the poor and less fortunate. not like donny and tucker who fed the finest spectrum of short bus maga trash a bunch of stolen election lies for money, sent them off to jail, threw them under the bus, and wouldn't even give these people a single penny of their newfound riches to help them make bail, hire their own lawyers, or even buy a couple snacks in jail.

but if you keep on donating and tuning in, maybe one of these days those guys will give two shits about any of the capitol rioters who they helped send to jail. just not today.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top