Real talk: McGregor was always overrated

MMAWizz

Yellow Belt
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
217
Reaction score
482
Conor McGregor is and has always been overrated.

There, I said it.

In his prime, he lost against Nate Diaz, a lifetime lightweight that was never particularly good. The biggest mistake he made was throwing a lead left that left him sprawled across the canvas with his own back presented as free real estate. It was McGregor’s first submission loss in the UFC, but not his last. McGregor has never been a truly great fighter, but he has always been fun to watch, and there are always enough little moments of brilliance that make up for the bad.

McGregor turned mixed martial arts into an international sport. He also captured the hearts of the Irish. He had them hanging off his every word for years before UFC 205. And now that he’s lost to the biggest mixed martial arts star in the eastern hemisphere, in a title match that had all but been handed to him on a silver platter, this whole “superhero” act has worn thin.

The truth is, he’s just not a particularly good fighter. And it’s all a farce. Moreover, that’s not the biggest point to be made about McGregor.

So that’s it? Conor McGregor is overrated? It was just a bunch of people hating on McGregor? It was just a bunch of folks celebrating McGregor for what he did? This is going to get better as the years go by? Let’s just move on?

People who are critical of McGregor should not go on and on about the man’s popularity, his power, his brilliance, or anything else. Instead, they should make the case for him as a terrible fighter, and everything else is simply hot air. And, as for how well he performs in the cage, well, look at his record. What do you see?

There are people who have spent time in the UFC, as well as the mainstream media, who think McGregor deserves to be on the level of a Jon Jones or Georges St. Pierre or Anderson Silva. The latter in particular might not be a terribly pleasant comparison, because Silva is a once-in-a-generation talent that elevated his sport to an entirely new level.

There's the argument from those same people that McGregor is “good enough” and deserves a chance to win a title.

But he’s not. He’s not good enough, and he doesn’t deserve a chance to win a title. The truth is, he’s not a top-15 fighter, and he would need to beat some moderate-sized names to begin getting serious consideration as one of the sport’s elite.

Even if he does win the lightweight championship by virtue of being given an undeserved title shot, he doesn’t have the resume to make him a top-five fighter. The best fighter McGregor has beat is Eddie Alvarez.

After more than two years of what can best be described as his “McConor Show,” we know about how entertaining McGregor can be. He is cocky, wild, brash, and over-the-top. He is, in every way, what you would expect from a “superhero.”

But he’s not a superhero.

He’s not a pioneer, and he’s not a trailblazer. He’s not a true champion, and he hasn’t beaten the top fighters in the sport. McGregor is a good fighter, but he’s not a great fighter. He’s a good looking man, and a flash in the pan. And that’s it.

By fighting Floyd Mayweather and taking away any chance that McGregor had to prove himself on his own terms, the UFC has just confirmed McGregor for what he is: a name, a hype-machine, a clown. And it’s time to move on from him.

It’s easy to be a hater, but it’s not wise to hate the hater.
 
Last edited:
Conor McGregor is and has always been overrated.

There, I said it.

In his prime, he lost against Nate Diaz, a lifetime lightweight that was never particularly good. The biggest mistake he made was throwing a lead left that left him sprawled across the canvas with his own back presented as free real estate. It was McGregor’s first submission loss, but not his last. McGregor has never been a truly great fighter, but he has always been fun to watch, and there are always enough little moments of brilliance that make up for the bad.

McGregor turned mixed martial arts into an international sport. He also captured the hearts of the Irish. He had them hanging off his every word for years before UFC 205. And now that he’s lost to the biggest mixed martial arts star in the eastern hemisphere, in a title match that had all but been handed to him on a silver platter, this whole “superhero” act has worn thin.

The truth is, he’s just not a particularly good fighter. And it’s all a farce. Moreover, that’s not the biggest point to be made about McGregor.

So that’s it? Conor McGregor is overrated? It was just a bunch of people hating on McGregor? It was just a bunch of folks celebrating McGregor for what he did? This is going to get better as the years go by? Let’s just move on?

People who are critical of McGregor should not go on and on about the man’s popularity, his power, his brilliance, or anything else. Instead, they should make the case for him as a terrible fighter, and everything else is simply hot air. And, as for how well he performs in the cage, well, look at his record. What do you see?

There are people who have spent time in the UFC, as well as the mainstream media, who think McGregor deserves to be on the level of a Jon Jones or Georges St. Pierre or Anderson Silva. The latter in particular might not be a terribly pleasant comparison, because Silva is a once-in-a-generation talent that elevated his sport to an entirely new level.

There's the argument from those same people that McGregor is “good enough” and deserves a chance to win a title.

But he’s not. He’s not good enough, and he doesn’t deserve a chance to win a title. The truth is, he’s not a top-15 fighter, and he would need to beat some moderate-sized names to begin getting serious consideration as one of the sport’s elite.

Even if he does win the lightweight championship by virtue of being given an undeserved title shot, he doesn’t have the resume to make him a top-five fighter. The best fighter McGregor has beat is Eddie Alvarez.

After more than two years of what can best be described as his “McConor Show,” we know about how entertaining McGregor can be. He is cocky, wild, brash, and over-the-top. He is, in every way, what you would expect from a “superhero.”

But he’s not a superhero.

He’s not a pioneer, and he’s not a trailblazer. He’s not a true champion, and he hasn’t beaten the top fighters in the sport. McGregor is a good fighter, but he’s not a great fighter. He’s a good looking man, and a flash in the pan. And that’s it.

By fighting Floyd Mayweather and taking away any chance that McGregor had to prove himself on his own terms, the UFC has just confirmed McGregor for what he is: a name, a hype-machine, a clown. And it’s time to move on from him.

It’s easy to be a hater, but it’s not wise to hate the hater.
Agreed. No argument.

Glad a few others can actually SEE this and realize it.
 
He wasn't overrated as a featherweight.

He definitely wasn't good enough to be competing at 'moneyweight' or whatever nonsense people like to call it. Going up to face Nate was a disastrous decision from everything but a financial standpoint.

His post-featherweight run has literally been car crash TV.

But his featherweight run was definitely legit.
 
Love the tough guy "real talk" phrase.
Like it was a "elephant in the room" type of conversation that no one ever had.

News flash, ONLY the people who don't like Mcgregor talk that bullshit.

95% of pros fighters, coaches, and fans of the sport give him his proper respect. Grow up
 
Disliked by you, yes, overrated, no. Conor walked through HOF GOAT candidate Aldo and destroyed Prime Alvarez. He also has wins over Poirier, Max Holloway, Chad Mendes, Nate Diaz and Donald Cerrone. Far from overrated.
 
McGregor was super talented at 145 in MMA and had opportunity to be FW GOAT, but USADA and his lack of defenses for the belt ended that possibility. He is just a middle of the pack high level striker at 155 lbs.

His career in the Top 5 is over unless he gets a lucky opportunity and punch, but he can probably make some interesting striking battles versus the right opportunity.
 
He nuked the goat FW in 13s. He made Alvarez look like an amateur. And then he partied way too hard and lost his way. Can't say I wouldn't do the same in that situation.
 
Conor was rated correctly at the time. You don't decimate the current champs by being overrated.

If anything, I feel like his Mayweather gamble is what really destroyed him. He changed styles way too much. Got too rich. Lost his hunger. Got confortable with his skillset while the MMA game passed him by. So when he came back, he jsut wasn't up to par.

He was not always overrated. He really was the best at that moment. He just didn't keep up the effort to continue being the best. He was too busy selling whisky, punching old dudes, allegedly raping girls, and doing tons of coke....allegedly.

By the time he decided that he wanted to do MMA again, the game passed him by. His competitors were working while he was playing. That's life man. Can't continue to be the best if you're not working toward it.
 
Not at FW. Wins over Max, Dustin, Mendes, and FW GOAT Aldo. 3 of those being finishes. LW for sure. He got a favorable matchup in Eddie. Might not have beat RDA and definitely not Khabib.
 
How many 145 can beat both prime aldo and Mendez?
Max,Conor and Max.
That's it
 
Conman had a great run winning the FW title and then beating Alvarez for the LW title. But, he definitely had some breaks and good fortune along the way. He got wins over Max and Poirier when they were young. He got a late notice Mendes who was beating him easily until he gassed out. I will always say that his win over Aldo was a fluke. RDA got hurt, which led to the 2 Nate fights. He was frankly lucky to win the 2nd fight. Had he fought RDA happened, I think his career would've taken a completely different path. But, he ended up fighting Alvarez instead who was a much better match-up. He hasn't done anything of note since that fight other than making a lot of money in the farce against Mayweather. Subbed by Khabib. Beat a completely washed Cerrone. Butt kicked twice by Poirier.
 
Conor McGregor is and has always been overrated.

There, I said it.

In his prime, he lost against Nate Diaz, a lifetime lightweight that was never particularly good. The biggest mistake he made was throwing a lead left that left him sprawled across the canvas with his own back presented as free real estate. It was McGregor’s first submission loss, but not his last. McGregor has never been a truly great fighter, but he has always been fun to watch, and there are always enough little moments of brilliance that make up for the bad.

McGregor turned mixed martial arts into an international sport. He also captured the hearts of the Irish. He had them hanging off his every word for years before UFC 205. And now that he’s lost to the biggest mixed martial arts star in the eastern hemisphere, in a title match that had all but been handed to him on a silver platter, this whole “superhero” act has worn thin.

The truth is, he’s just not a particularly good fighter. And it’s all a farce. Moreover, that’s not the biggest point to be made about McGregor.

So that’s it? Conor McGregor is overrated? It was just a bunch of people hating on McGregor? It was just a bunch of folks celebrating McGregor for what he did? This is going to get better as the years go by? Let’s just move on?

People who are critical of McGregor should not go on and on about the man’s popularity, his power, his brilliance, or anything else. Instead, they should make the case for him as a terrible fighter, and everything else is simply hot air. And, as for how well he performs in the cage, well, look at his record. What do you see?

There are people who have spent time in the UFC, as well as the mainstream media, who think McGregor deserves to be on the level of a Jon Jones or Georges St. Pierre or Anderson Silva. The latter in particular might not be a terribly pleasant comparison, because Silva is a once-in-a-generation talent that elevated his sport to an entirely new level.

There's the argument from those same people that McGregor is “good enough” and deserves a chance to win a title.

But he’s not. He’s not good enough, and he doesn’t deserve a chance to win a title. The truth is, he’s not a top-15 fighter, and he would need to beat some moderate-sized names to begin getting serious consideration as one of the sport’s elite.

Even if he does win the lightweight championship by virtue of being given an undeserved title shot, he doesn’t have the resume to make him a top-five fighter. The best fighter McGregor has beat is Eddie Alvarez.

After more than two years of what can best be described as his “McConor Show,” we know about how entertaining McGregor can be. He is cocky, wild, brash, and over-the-top. He is, in every way, what you would expect from a “superhero.”

But he’s not a superhero.

He’s not a pioneer, and he’s not a trailblazer. He’s not a true champion, and he hasn’t beaten the top fighters in the sport. McGregor is a good fighter, but he’s not a great fighter. He’s a good looking man, and a flash in the pan. And that’s it.

By fighting Floyd Mayweather and taking away any chance that McGregor had to prove himself on his own terms, the UFC has just confirmed McGregor for what he is: a name, a hype-machine, a clown. And it’s time to move on from him.

It’s easy to be a hater, but it’s not wise to hate the hater.
morgan-freeman-meme-hes-right-you-know-blank-traffic-club-53644125 copy.jpg
 
Back
Top