Real question, pornstars, and Playboy models, do you believe Trump never had an aborted baby?

[Farmer Br0wn]

Comparing Trump to Paul has to be one of the most heretical and religiously offensive things I've seen a person say online.

Kudos to you for having the stones/shamelessness to not only abandon any pretense of religious morality, but to proffer such a ludicrous justification.

Even from the very beginning of Christianity, Christ's messengers could flawed people.

I get the feeling you're not very familiar with Paul's life before his conversion. Look it up and get back to me, you'll understand the comparison much better.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Comparing any important and positive biblical figure to a moronic, self-obsessed, immature, petty, hateful, selfish, corrupt, untruthful, shameless swindler piece of shit with zero redeeming qualities other than a willingness to pander to morons (that most covet being able to pretend that they understand complex problems more than their betters) to secure personal gain - that's objectively offensive to anyone with meaningful interest in the religion as a moral text.

IMO.

Even if that positive Biblical figure was a mass murderer?

 

[TheComebackKid]

Baby killer or fascist.

When Democrats and Republicans tell the truth.

Go team baby killer go!

You're either a baby killer or a racist? No in between?

 

[VivaRevolution]

You're either a baby killer or a racist? No in between?

Not a racist, but a fascist.

Get it right.

And it isn't like being called, like Hitler, because you denied the Holocaust, it is more like being called like Hitler because you got caught gassing Jews.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Not a racist, but a fascist.

Get it right.

Autocorrect, prick.

And it isn't like being called, like Hitler, because you denied the Holocaust, it is more like being called like Hitler because you got caught gassing Jews.

So you're calling yourself a baby killer because you actually killed baboes, is that what you're saying?

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

I always have, because I'm not afraid of the real conversation, which is your belief that you should use the governments Monopoly on violence to trespass on other's property.

I'm a baby killer.

And you are a fascist who believes the government should own people's body.

The only way a person can find the act of abortion as morally acceptable, is if the life of the baby is nowhere in your moral considerations.

If the life of the baby enters into the equation at all, then the moral nature of abortion becomes much more complicated.

One of the ways that the pro-abortion side tries to get around this moral quandary is to try and redefine the problem away. This is done by referring to the in-utero baby as anything other than a baby. Terms like fetus, blastoise, and zygote are used in an attempt to dehumanize the baby.

If the baby is given any moral consideration at all, the moral certainty of the pro-abortion side disappears instantly.

 

[VivaRevolution]

Autocorrect, prick.



So you're calling yourself a baby killer because you actually killed baboes, is that what you're saying?

No, I'm just not afraid of the rhetoric, because being a fascist, a actual fascist, is just as bad as being a baby killer.

Abortion is controversial for a reason, and it isn't because one side is right, and the other is evil, so I take it to it's absurd and yet logical conclusion to point out the absurdity of it.

 

[VivaRevolution]

The only way a person can find the act of abortion as morally acceptable, is if the life of the baby is nowhere in your moral considerations.

If the life of the baby enters into the equation at all, then the moral nature of abortion becomes much more complicated.

One of the ways that the pro-abortion side tries to get around this moral quandary is to try and redefine the problem away. This is done by referring to the in-utero baby as anything other than a baby. Terms like fetus, blastoise, and zygote are used in an attempt to dehumanize the baby.

If the baby is given any moral consideration at all, the moral certainty of the pro-abortion side disappears instantly.

And calling it a baby is psycological warfare as well.

Please, let's not pretend that it is the left that is afraid to have this debate without emotional appeals.

I can flip this right back at you, the only people who defend the state owning a person's body, are called fascists.

 

[Drenalin]

lol trump haters running out of material. You nerd virgins have reached a new low

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

And calling it a baby is psycological warfare as well.

Please, let's not pretend that it is the left that is afraid to have this debate without emotional appeals.

What else is it other than a baby human?

It's not a tree, it's not a spoon, it's a baby.

Your response is another attempt at redefining the problem away, and dehumanizing the baby.

 

[VivaRevolution]

What else is it other than a baby human?

It's not a tree, it's not a spoon, it's a baby.

Your response is another attempt at redefining the problem away, and dehumanizing the baby.

That is because you want to call it a baby so that you can pretend you aren't using the government to take guns, and keep women from expelling a human cute little baby from trespassing on her property.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

lol trump haters running out of material. You nerd virgins have reached a new low

The President Trump haters are now having to make up hypothetical "what if" scenarios, and try to attack President Trump on that.

We're starting to enter the "fantasy baseball" stage of President Trump hatred.

 

[VivaRevolution]

The President Trump haters are now having to make up hypothetical "what if" scenarios, and try to attack President Trump on that.

We're starting to enter the "fantasy baseball" stage of President Trump hatred.

So you don't think he has had one of his kids aborted?

Are you interested in investing in Vivacoin? It is the next Bitcoin. I guarantee it.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

That is because you want to call it a baby so that you can pretend you aren't using the government to take guns, and keep women from expelling a human cute little baby from trespassing on her property.

When a woman becomes pregnant, it's not just her body anymore. There's also the body of the human baby inside her.

The only way your side can attempt to maintain a moral high ground is if the baby is given no moral consideration at all.

Your last few posts have been a poor attempt at minimizing the moral considerations of the baby. The reason for that is simple, you don't want people to give moral considerations to the baby for ideological reasons.

 

[VivaRevolution]

When a woman becomes pregnant, it's not just her body anymore. There's also the body of the human baby inside her.

The only way your side can attempt to maintain a moral high ground is if the baby is given no moral consideration at all.

Your last few posts have been a poor attempt at minimizing the moral considerations of the baby. The reason for that is simple, you don't want people to give moral considerations to the baby for ideological reasons.

Stop right at the first paragraph. You admit it. You want to use the government monopoly of violence to force a women to give up her ownership of her body.

I promise you that I find that just as morally reprehensible as you do killing babies.

Slavery is as bad as murder. The state owning slaves? Worse then murder.

 

[TheComebackKid]

No, I'm just not afraid of the rhetoric, because being a fascist, a actual fascist, is just as bad as being a baby killer.

Abortion is controversial for a reason, and it isn't because one side is right, and the other is evil, so I take it to it's absurd and yet logical conclusion to point out the absurdity of it.

Is there a way to not be a fascist but also stop others from killing babies on your opinion?

 

[VivaRevolution]

Is there a way to not be a fascist but also stop others from killing babies on your opinion?

Yeah it's called being anti-abortion as a personal choice, and not being a Nazi thinking the state should own others people's body.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Stop right at the first paragraph. You admit it. You want to use the government monopoly of violence to force a women to give up her ownership of her body.

I promise you that I find that just as morally reprehensible as you do killing babies.

Slavery is as bad as murder. The state owning slaves? Worse then murder.

The only way your position is morally justified, is if the baby is given no moral consideration whatsoever.

Comparing people who want to save the lives of unborn babies with Nazis shows your moral confusion on this issue.

 

[VivaRevolution]

lol trump haters running out of material. You nerd virgins have reached a new low

I think the low you heard was the sound of a vacuum, and a child support payment dissappearing.

Trump calls that the art of the deal.

 

[VivaRevolution]

The only way your position is morally justified, is if the baby is given no moral consideration whatsoever.

Comparing people who want to save the lives of unborn babies with Nazis shows your moral confusion on this issue.

The Nazi's were trying to save the arian race, or perhaps you haven't heard.

Your Arian race is cute little babies. That is how you justify your atrocity.

I don't have to play games of denial.

I own the killing of cute little babies with the brain function of a bug, in defense of liberty, and not having state owned slaves.