Question for U.K. peeps - immigration

[Trotsky]

If they said what they slip-ups where (which aren't listed anywhere - allows for leftists to dump at will) everyone would see the bias on display.

The delusion and paranoia with you all is palpable.

The only "dumped" thread I have seen here in recent weeks was the one last night where you right-wing geniuses were openly using racial slurs (I believe you liked the "wet back" comment, yes?) and saying that Cuban American criminals were Dreamers.


There is no bias. Make good threads and good posts -- ones that contain facts and adhere to logic -- and you won't have your shit dumped. Do you see right wingers like TheGreatA, Cubo de Sangre, and JudoThrowFiasco getting their posts/thread dumped? No? Oh, because they aren't morons posting mindless drivel.

 

[FIMN]

If they said what they slip-ups where (which aren't listed anywhere - allows for leftists to dump at will) everyone would see the bias on display.

Ahh yes, sherdog moderation team is a hive of leftist villainy. Part of the Marxist cabal

 

[Soul Crusher]

I'm not ignoring problems caused by immigration today. I'm not sure what would give you that impression. It would be awfully difficult to ignore them given where I live. You don't have to show me a Eurabia scare video, I live in a european little Marakech.

You are correct that the two situations aren't comparable, in a way. Immigration contributed greatly to the population of the U.S. exploding by 21% in just 10 years. You cannot compare immigration like this to what's happening in Europe currently.

When you said "*gasp* brown people" I assumed you didn't think it was a big deal.

 

[Soul Crusher]

There is no bias.

 

[uppercutbus]

The delusion and paranoia with you all is palpable.

The only "dumped" thread I have seen here in recent weeks was the one last night where you right-wing geniuses were openly using racial slurs (I believe you liked the "wet back" comment, yes?) and saying that Cuban American criminals were Dreamers.


There is no bias. Make good threads and good posts -- ones that contain facts and adhere to logic -- and you won't have your shit dumped. Do you see right wingers like TheGreatA, Cubo de Sangre, and JudoThrowFiasco getting their posts/thread dumped? No? Oh, because they aren't morons posting mindless drivel.

No bias laughable - put that to the test and start giving reasons for dumps. But you and your ilk don't want to do you?

Ahh yes, sherdog moderation team is a hive of leftist villainy. Part of the Marxist cabal

Then it wouldn't be a problem giving reasons, what are you scared of?

Check and mate. Can't have it both ways. - Totally unbiased! No we will do it with no oversight and no reasons given!

 

[danny23]

Oh, no, these were not the desired responses lol

Immediately a bunch of Brits replied denying the fantasy and, in response, a bunch of the usual American crowd started spamming propaganda.

Bit like how California is supposed to be doomed with immigration, is a "progressive degenerate shithole", yet at the same time manages to be the 6th largest economy of the world. They must be doing something right...

 

[Trotsky]

Half of the mods are bona fide Republicans.

One regularly ran Republican discussion threads. Another ran for fucking political office as a Republican. Another constantly bitches about SJW-ism and shit talks leftists

You're a moron if you think there's some left wing bias. It's just that the right wing is incredibly immature and stupid here. But, judging by your Feb 2018 join date, you know that.

No bias laughable - put that to the test and start giving reasons for dumps. But you and your ilk don't want to do you?


Then it wouldn't be a problem giving reasons, what are you scared of?

Check and mate. Can't have it both ways. - Totally unbiased! No we will do it with no oversight and no reasons given!

As I said, I only know of one dump, and it was after you were using racial slurs and jerking each other off over a 10 month-old story.

It's not up to them to explain to you that using racial slurs is unsightly. Grow up, you fucking loser.

 

[uppercutbus]

As I said, I only know of one dump, and it was after you were using racial slurs and jerking each other off over a 10 month-old story.

It's not up to them to explain to you that using racial slurs is unsightly. Grow up, you fucking loser.

Whut? Linkify?

I will expect your apology soon.

You're a moron if you think there's some left wing bias.

Put that to the test and start giving reasons. Can't be so adamant about it then don't want to put it to the test.

 

[phoenixikki]

Oh, no, these were not the desired responses lol

Immediately a bunch of Brits replied denying the fantasy and, in response, a bunch of the usual American crowd started spamming propaganda.

A bunch of "Brits" appear

Bit like how California is supposed to be doomed with immigration, is a "progressive degenerate shithole", yet at the same time manages to be the 6th largest economy of the world. They must be doing something right...

If Immigration Creates Wealth, Why Is California America's Poverty Capital?

 

[Trotsky]

A bunch of "Brits" appear

If Immigration Creates Wealth, Why Is California America's Poverty Capital?

I think @Jack V Savage, a California resident of some economic knowledge, has explained why that moniker is completely bunk.

 

[uppercutbus]

waiting for apology trotsky. . .

A Google search tells me it's that Southern paradise - Mississippi.
Most Southern states have the worst poverty and California isn't in the top ten.
Try again lol.

sherdog > google

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/california-ranks-last-place-in-new-quality-of-life-report.3719911/

 

[danny23]

A bunch of "Brits" appear

If Immigration Creates Wealth, Why Is California America's Poverty Capital?

A Google search tells me it's that Southern paradise - Mississippi.
Most Southern states have the worst poverty and California isn't in the top ten.
Try again lol.

 

[phoenixikki]

A Google search tells me it's that Southern paradise - Mississippi.
Most Southern states have the worst poverty and California isn't in the top ten.
Try again lol.

"According to the U.S. Census Bureau's Official Poverty Measure, California's poverty rate hovers around 15 percent. But this figure is misleading: the Census Bureau measures poverty relative to a uniform national standard, which doesn't account for differences in living costs between states – the cost of taxes, housing, and health care are higher in California than in Oklahoma, for example. Accounting for these differences reveals that California's real poverty rate is 20.6 percent – the highest in America, and nearly twice the national average of 12.7 percent."

 

[21 Savage]

Do go on.

when i brought up the low and rapidly decreasing number of white british in london you said it was completely normal because large cities "tend to be diverse" but when i pointed out earlier decades in which london have had a much more significant white british population you said again "yeah nothing weird at all completely normal"

im paraphrasing

 

[Prokofievian]

When you said "*gasp* brown people" I assumed you didn't think it was a big deal.

Well, that I don't think it's as big of a deal as people on the far right wouldn't imply that I don't think that there are challenges presented.

For example I think that countries should have asylum programs (what a cuck, amirite?). However, european countries seem to have a lot of trouble in sending the people that they reject home. That's a problem. You don't have a program if you can't filter the applicants. The asylum seekers who have committed attacks have, by in large, been refused by some country before they committed the attack, but for some reason were still around. For example, the Turku attacker, or the Berlin truck attacker. The asylum program's doing its job. The rest of the apparatus isn't.

 

[Prokofievian]

when i brought up the low and rapidly decreasing number of white british in london you said it was completely normal because large cities "tend to be diverse" but when i pointed out earlier decades in which london have had a much more significant white british population you said again "yeah nothing weird at all completely normal"

im paraphrasing

There's no contradiction here, and the rest of my post (which you cut off) explains how.

 

[Soul Crusher]

Half of the mods are bona fide Republicans.

One regularly ran Republican discussion threads. Another ran for fucking political office as a Republican. Another constantly bitches about SJW-ism and shit talks leftists

You're a moron if you think there's some left wing bias. It's just that the right wing is incredibly immature and stupid here. But, judging by your Feb 2018 join date, you know that.

Nice deflection. Not going to work though.

Certain threads will get dumped because it was created by someone deemed to be racist. While another poster not deemed racist will post the exact same topic and with less content in the op and not have his thread dumped. Threads with good posts and content will get dumped. It happens too often but you'll deny it which is to be expected. They will gladly ban posters that speak the truth. Love the fact that free speech doesn't exist here and that they have control over it. They try to protect Islam as best they can. Post a funny gif about Islam and you get a yellow card if you're a certain poster.

What strange reality are you living in? The loony "left" created a clown show in the war room. They call for bans left right and center, have their finger on the report button at all times, if they don't like a thread they gang up, derail and spam shitty posts and anyone who doesn't adhere to their way of thinking is racist.

They have no problem using snake like tactics.

 

[21 Savage]

There's no contradiction here, and the rest of my post (which you cut off) explains how.

so london being non british white in 2018 is normal because large cities tend to be diverse

but london never having been non british white ever before is also normal because...brown people?

 

[danny23]

"According to the U.S. Census Bureau's Official Poverty Measure, California's poverty rate hovers around 15 percent. But this figure is misleading: the Census Bureau measures poverty relative to a uniform national standard, which doesn't account for differences in living costs between states – the cost of taxes, housing, and health care are higher in California than in Oklahoma, for example. Accounting for these differences reveals that California's real poverty rate is 20.6 percent – the highest in America, and nearly twice the national average of 12.7 percent."

Another poor attempt.
High cost of living cities and skew the average when rural areas are less expensive.

 

[FIMN]

A bunch of "Brits" appear

Why would you doubt the posters who have answered OPs questions, seemingly in good faith, are in fact British?