anything specifically, or just a general overview?
Generally, Canada’s official addiction services (and even more so the “un-official” representatives that run non-governmental centres) have been pursuing the “harm reduction” model for some time now, which is distinct from the path-to-treatment model. The emphasis being on the removal of stigma in hopes that doing so will lead to more informed(and supervised) use, and pressure or hard requirements are generally considered negative factors, effectively stigmas.
so, for example, government online resources will focus on safe ways to use, and avoid any language considered pressuring towards treatment.
This was most apparent to me in Toronto through the GMSA (Gay Men’s Sexual Health Alliance), a Gov. funded outreach group attempting to put together online resources. Their official goal was reducing the transfer of disease amongst that population, but specifically here I’m referring to their Safe Drug Use projects.
Anyways, that’s mirrored throughout our healthcare in the outreach programs and un-official projects. There’s a chance it might even be the correct approach, either technically or ethically, but the strength that it’s taken hold is shocking considering the claim of “harm reduction” is so far only true when very specific statistics are considered in limited scope.