PWD 605: It's Time, It's Time

Best Vader Opponent

  • Flair

    Votes: 3 7.3%
  • Hogan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sting

    Votes: 26 63.4%
  • HBK

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Foley

    Votes: 8 19.5%
  • Kane

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Heath Slater

    Votes: 2 4.9%

  • Total voters
    41
Status
Not open for further replies.
There are different levels of crazy. You can still be a piece of shit who is fully capable of realising what you're doing while also having mental illnesses.

Well mental illness by definition precludes responsibility.
 
How can you not include Stan Hansen in the poll since it was that feud that first made Vader well known in the US and a legend in Japan

@RollSonnenRoll poll sucks, thread sucks, you suck
 
How can you not include Stan Hansen in the poll since it was that feud that first made Vader well known in the US and a legend in Japan

@RollSonnenRoll poll sucks, thread sucks, you suck

giphy.gif
 
Well mental illness by definition precludes responsibility.
I'm not a lawyer or a judge, but I'm pretty sure that if I go out and rob a bank or something I'm not gonna get off free because I've got a couple mental illnesses. As I said there's different levels to these things.
 
I'm not a lawyer or a judge, but I'm pretty sure that if I go out and rob a bank or something I'm not gonna get off free because I've got a couple mental illnesses. As I said there's different levels to these things.
Serial killers obviously aint right in the head but they are still held responsible for their crimes
You think Jeffrey Dahmer didnt have some issues going on in his skull?
 
Serial killers obviously aint right in the head but they are still held responsible for their crimes
You think Jeffrey Dahmer didnt have some issues going on in his skull?
Yeah, I feel like the argument here is that you can get away with things and people aren't allowed to be mad at you just because you've got a mental illness. Obviously it depends on the mental illness and the thing you did though.
 
Did anyone actually read the Facebook article? It’s not for people that want to chat in boy meets world groups or wrestling groups like me. It’s for people that want to provide premium content or access to professionals. Essentially the same as websites that put content behind a paywall. Now you can put content on Facebook groups behind a paywall. It’s seems logical to me.
 
Did anyone actually read the Facebook article? It’s not for people that want to chat in boy meets world groups or wrestling groups like me. It’s for people that want to provide premium content or access to professionals. Essentially the same as websites that put content behind a paywall. Now you can put content on Facebook groups behind a paywall. It’s seems logical to me.
Nah, I didn't. I don't use Facebook, so I wasn't that bothered to look.
 
Did anyone actually read the Facebook article? It’s not for people that want to chat in boy meets world groups or wrestling groups like me. It’s for people that want to provide premium content or access to professionals. Essentially the same as websites that put content behind a paywall. Now you can put content on Facebook groups behind a paywall. It’s seems logical to me.

Yes I read the article
They wanna charge 30 bucks to post on Facebook
LOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLLOLOLOL


























































LOL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top