There are different levels of crazy. You can still be a piece of shit who is fully capable of realising what you're doing while also having mental illnesses.
How can you not include Stan Hansen in the poll since it was that feud that first made Vader well known in the US and a legend in Japan
@RollSonnenRoll poll sucks, thread sucks, you suck
I'm not a lawyer or a judge, but I'm pretty sure that if I go out and rob a bank or something I'm not gonna get off free because I've got a couple mental illnesses. As I said there's different levels to these things.Well mental illness by definition precludes responsibility.
Facebook wants to charge people 30 bucks a month to post in their groups
LOLOLOLOLOL
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...oups-monthly-subscription-service-fees-access
Facebook wants to charge people 30 bucks a month to post in their groups
LOLOLOLOLOL
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...oups-monthly-subscription-service-fees-access
Serial killers obviously aint right in the head but they are still held responsible for their crimesI'm not a lawyer or a judge, but I'm pretty sure that if I go out and rob a bank or something I'm not gonna get off free because I've got a couple mental illnesses. As I said there's different levels to these things.
They are scumbags.
We are scumbags *clap clap... clap clap clap*
Yeah, I feel like the argument here is that you can get away with things and people aren't allowed to be mad at you just because you've got a mental illness. Obviously it depends on the mental illness and the thing you did though.Serial killers obviously aint right in the head but they are still held responsible for their crimes
You think Jeffrey Dahmer didnt have some issues going on in his skull?
I'm not sure if you're talking about people who work at Facebook or the Chicago crowd.We're smart allegedly *clap clap... clap clap clap*
I'm not sure if you're talking about people who work at Facebook or the Chicago crowd.
I'd be lying if I said I didn't originally post that hoping for you or @deezy to reply with a butthurt comment.Both really
Nah, I didn't. I don't use Facebook, so I wasn't that bothered to look.Did anyone actually read the Facebook article? It’s not for people that want to chat in boy meets world groups or wrestling groups like me. It’s for people that want to provide premium content or access to professionals. Essentially the same as websites that put content behind a paywall. Now you can put content on Facebook groups behind a paywall. It’s seems logical to me.
Did anyone actually read the Facebook article? It’s not for people that want to chat in boy meets world groups or wrestling groups like me. It’s for people that want to provide premium content or access to professionals. Essentially the same as websites that put content behind a paywall. Now you can put content on Facebook groups behind a paywall. It’s seems logical to me.