Premier League Thread v203 : Who is missing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Almighty Angus
  • Start date Start date

Who's not in the CL next year?

  • Total voters
    14
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tules said:
labour need to fix up on immigration
Click to expand...

Remember abandoning the Falkland Islanders, Gibralatarians and Northern Irish without referendums, is about 'freedom'. They are anti British, there's no escaping it.

In an interview with a pro-republican journal at the time she said Ireland is "our struggle" and added: "A defeat in Northern Ireland would be a defeat indeed."

Ms Abbott, one of Mr Corbyn's closest allies, added that she "couldn't identify as British" and slammed Northern Ireland as an "enclave of white supremacist ideologies"
 
Concrete said:
Corbyn, McDonnell and Abbott are all on the record as being pro Sinn Feinn and thus pro IRA, in the strongest of terms. It's not a secret, they wanted the army to leave Northern Ireland and leave the Ulstermen to their fate. They don't represent 'the oppressed' they represent marxism. I don't know how people can't see it.
Click to expand...
you still havent provided any sources for this
 
Good Ole Stannis's BBQ said:
Don't really care what anybody says about them the two players from united who would benefit Arsenal the most are Herrera and fellaini. The midfield is physically and mentally weak.
Click to expand...

I can't believe I'm ok with Fellaini now lmao. Guy absolutely dominated Ajax. There's a reason he keeps sticking around. Not a starter for bigger aspirations but ok to have on the squad. All the players/coaches really like him too.

Yeah I think they'd both help. Herrera would be an upgrade and as I said tree guy has his uses. You're missing one other mid though

Arsenal-fan-praying.jpg


MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MIDFIELD 2017
Mga223 said:
@Clear Winner @El Che @Tobago Jones @Chris Partlow

Im taking warriors in 5.
Click to expand...

7
 
That's where the 'unelectable' stuff comes from, they are ideologue scum masquerading as princpled, I can't believe so many people fall for it.
 
frenzy said:
i suppose it's too hard to try and read neutral papers i guess
Click to expand...

The Times is neutral. Even left leaning websites like BBC News still cover this stuff.

In face I reject the premise, you should read a range of things anyway. If you read the Guardian AND the Telegraph, you will get a much better picture of reality compared to just reading one or the other.
 
oh shit its tomorrow!?!

thought it was sunday lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,701
Messages
58,312,119
Members
175,998
Latest member
Fitboy485

Share this page

Back
Top