And of course Turkyie scores again so they could fuck up my kicktipp
I’m not surprisedI'm the Everton of the Kicktipp atm + @Chules top of the league (that means he's NOT the Arsenal of Kicktipp)
I’m not really a spastic bruv, it’s all a charadeKicktipp is all over the place this time round. Who would have predicted
(1) @Chules
(2) @Deffid
(3) @Possum Jenkins
Early days though!
/
@Chules
The laws of physics mean it's much more likely for the ahead team to score again in the open goal, than for the goalie to contribute to a goal.
I never really loved his playing style and definitely never worshipped him whilst he was at uNited. He was selfish and self important. Even in the CL final against Chelsea I couldn’t stand the way he was acting. I know he’s scored a ton fo goals but he’ll never be a Zidane, Maradonna, Messi, Berbatov (don’t laugh!!!),Bergkamp, Cantona, Scholes, Pirlo, Del Piero, Hagi, le Tissier (;-))..
....interesting take.
You can thank me for two of your points anytime you wantI’m not really a spastic bruv, it’s all a charade
Good luck Ronaldo!!
He’s a machine but lacked that absolute flair. Anyway whatever!
They're singing the national anthems and @Chules still hasn't predicted.
Edit: oh no he presumably has, it just doesn't show anyone else so you don't copy.
Only one point between the top four Kicktippers!
This is a reductive take. There's an element of subjectivity to the debate though. I think most of the time sending the goalie up is stupid, and it's just been demonstrated why. The chance of him scoring or contributing to a goal is 0.1% and the chance of you looking ridiculous, conceding with an empty net, and losing by an additional goal is maybe 20%. Does that 0.1% outweigh the 20%? If you reduce it to the drawing/winning %age chance, yes. But in the Big Picture, no. At least not the great majority of the time.......sure, but the chance to draw is >>>>>>>>>>>> than the chance to lose by 2.
Thank you my brotherYou can thank me for two of your points anytime you want