Le Pen @ +350 is pretty decent. I took it for 1u.
I mean, I can't fault that, but it seems really hard for her to catch up in the heads up.
Le Pen @ +350 is pretty decent. I took it for 1u.
Not following. Saw some lines with le Pen around +400. I thought Fillon had fallen off the map due to some scandals or something? And the favorite is someone called Marcon? Lol, help meanyone been keeping up on the FE? fillon seems to be outright mimicking trump's campaign strategies, polls have him like 6 /7 points behind the other 2, and la penn just launched a tirade against him: http://www.politico.eu/article/marine-le-pen-attacks-francois-fillon-as-man-who-loves-money/. his price immediately re-acted on the exchange, drifting back out too 5.8 atm from around 5.0
Not following. Saw some lines with le Pen around +400. I thought Fillon had fallen off the map due to some scandals or something? And the favorite is someone called Marcon? Lol, help me
I probably know the least about macron but at a spritely 39 years old he could appeal a lot more to the younger demographic, I think younger french voters are more invested and involved in the political process than UK or USA, but could be wrong.
Fucking awesome line.Took Trump to see out first term (assassination voids bet) on Betfair exchange at about +112 after their commission.
Fucking awesome line.
Can you try? I have no betting interest here, just genuinely curious. I know that media analysis is often less than trustworthy in politics.melanchon surging in the polls, not all that far behind fillon now, his odds shortened from 30/1 to about 12/1 right now. no way the establishment let's him pick up to much support. la penn seems to be getting attacked a lot more, evident by her polling numbers, it's hard to cap altogether with all the worldwide events taking place that could possibly have some effect on ppl's views.
Can you try? I have no betting interest here, just genuinely curious. I know that media analysis is often less than trustworthy in politics.
Can you try? I have no betting interest here, just genuinely curious. I know that media analysis is often less than trustworthy in politics.
I didn't see much creativity from Trump at all. He lucked out that the electoral college was flippable due to the combination his long-standing mercantalism and Clinton's long-standing globalism. I can't think of an effective creative appeal to non-standard groups that he made which actually helped him win.I don't think she's as good as Trump at finding creative paths to an election win by appealing to non-standard groups of voters, but she's definitely fairly good at grabbing opportunities. Not sure if she gets the opening, but if she gets it she can probably take it.
Well for one thing he decided to spend a ton of his time and resources in the rust belt during the last weeks despite media, polling and a bunch of us in this thread thinking that was kind of wtf and a waste of time. Somehow he got those states and lost a few we thought he had a bigger chance in. Somehow the guy knew where to aim and did well due to it. Obviously those things you mention had a much bigger impact, but I still think he could've fucked it up very easy if he wasn't reasonably good about it.
It was my belief that Trump wasn't doing many events in the rustbelt until the very end. I thought it was more of a last ditch effort. I don't believe significant rustbelt polling was available until the last 45 days or so.