News Plaintiffs strike key win in UFC antitrust lawsuit after judges deny defendant’s appeal

Siver!

Sedriques Dumbass Belt
Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2021
Messages
26,104
Reaction score
53,158
https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/plaintiffs-strike-key-win-ufc-013026975.html

A pair of judges have denied the UFC’s request to appeal class certification in its ongoing antitrust lawsuit.

In August, the lawsuit filed in 2014 by former UFC fighters seeking damages from the promotion was granted “bout class” certification in the U.S. District Court in Las Vegas. The UFC’s legal team said they anticipated the decision and planned to appeal the decision by federal judge Richard F. Boulware.

In response, the plaintiffs filed a 30-page opposition brief in September, stating the promotion’s appeal did not address “extensive evidence in support of class certification.”

In a one-page document filed Wednesday, two judges with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied the appeal request from the promotion’s attorneys. The decision is a key win for the plaintiffs, who include former UFC fighters Cung Le, John Fitch, Kyle Kingsbury, and Brandon Vera, among others.

The former fighters allege the UFC suppressed fighter pay through anti-competitive tactics such as shutting out competition and controlling the market for top-level fighters from 2010-2017. They seek $811 million to $1.6 billion in damages from the Las Vegas-based promotion, which could apply to 1,200 fighters during the time period alleged in the lawsuit.

Judge Boulware previously stated he intends to make the case a priority, seeking to hold a trial in March or April 2024, a decade after the initial filing. The rejection of the UFC’s appeal means the case is one step closer to reaching trial, although there are more hurdles to be cleared.

The promotion is also dealing with another antitrust lawsuit headed by Kajan Johnson, who fought for the UFC from 2014-18. That case is similar to the one headed by Le, however, it covers fighters who competed from June 2017 to the present day.

---

upload_2023-11-2_4-16-35.png

 
Last edited:
So you're confirming the court date will not happen, right?

Um that isn't what I'm confirming... they will definitely see a judge in 2024...

The judge will probably try to kick it back to mediation/arbitration... or if it goes class action you are talking about adding years of negotiations and gathering plaintiffs etc.

The 2024 court date doesn't mean the case is even close to any form of conclusion.
 
https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/plaintiffs-strike-key-win-ufc-013026975.html

A pair of judges have denied the UFC’s request to appeal class certification in its ongoing antitrust lawsuit.

In August, the lawsuit filed in 2014 by former UFC fighters seeking damages from the promotion was granted “bout class” certification in the U.S. District Court in Las Vegas. The UFC’s legal team said they anticipated the decision and planned to appeal the decision by federal judge Richard F. Boulware.

In response, the plaintiffs filed a 30-page opposition brief in September, stating the promotion’s appeal did not address “extensive evidence in support of class certification.”

In a one-page document filed Wednesday, two judges with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied the appeal request from the promotion’s attorneys. The decision is a key win for the plaintiffs, who include former UFC fighters Cung Le, John Fitch, Kyle Kingsbury, and Brandon Vera, among others.

The former fighters allege the UFC suppressed fighter pay through anti-competitive tactics such as shutting out competition and controlling the market for top-level fighters from 2010-2017. They seek $811 million to $1.6 billion in damages from the Las Vegas-based promotion, which could apply to 1,200 fighters during the time period alleged in the lawsuit.

Judge Boulware previously stated he intends to make the case a priority, seeking to hold a trial in March or April 2024, a decade after the initial filing. The rejection of the UFC’s appeal means the case is one step closer to reaching trial, although there are more hurdles to be cleared.

The promotion is also dealing with another antitrust lawsuit headed by Kajan Johnson, who fought for the UFC from 2014-18. That case is similar to the one headed by Le, however, it covers fighters who competed from June 2017 to the present day.

---

View attachment 1009776



1 step closer to the world hearing what has really been going on.
Quite the task, but these guys are sticking to their guns, fuck yeah, good for them.

You can only be shitty for so long, and eventually you get your slip exposed.
 
Um that isn't what I'm confirming... they will definitely see a judge in 2024...

The judge will probably try to kick it back to mediation/arbitration... or if it goes class action you are talking about adding years of negotiations and gathering plaintiffs etc.

The 2024 court date doesn't mean the case is even close to any form of conclusion.

All righty, sounds good!
 
Um that isn't what I'm confirming... they will definitely see a judge in 2024...

The judge will probably try to kick it back to mediation/arbitration... or if it goes class action you are talking about adding years of negotiations and gathering plaintiffs etc.

The 2024 court date doesn't mean the case is even close to any form of conclusion.

But they recently made the decision to let it become a class action lawsuit sir.
 
Good step forward for the fighters involved in the class action law suit, not a good step forward for the UFC though.
 



Judge Bennett is a Trump appointee. Probably burns Dana ass.

upload_2023-11-2_14-18-41.png
 
Back
Top