Perhaps the worst card of all time?

mallen7272

Shooper
Joined
Jul 28, 2018
Messages
3,704
Reaction score
825
Honestly...


Anthony Smith (-135) vs. Devin Clark (+115) — Light heavyweight

Miguel Baeza (-200) vs. Takashi Sato (+175) — Welterweight

Josh Parisian (-230) vs. Parker Porter (+190) — Heavyweight

Spike Carlyle (-165) vs. Bill Algeo (+140) — Featherweight
 
Legit heard of one fighter and I couldn't care less about him fighting.
 
We have a dude just throwing hooks while looking at the floor, worse than past prime wandy even.
 
Judging how good or bad a card is before you watch it is pure idiocy
 
Yeah, today I feel like a boxing fan, even though I'm a way bigger MMA fan. Couldn't care less about missin' those MMA fights tonight. Izzy picked a good event to miss if you had to miss a fight night Saturday. Hell, the co-main event of the Tyson card is better than the main event of the Smith card.
 
some Sherbro comes out of the woodwork and says the exact same thing every Fight Night

LMAOOOOO
 
Unfortunatly, that gets asked way too often around here.
What's even more unfortunate is that the MMA cards have SUCKED lately. They're so watered down, it's disgusting. Lionheart's the biggest name on the card and his fighting's about as good as a wrestling state champion that competes at Welterweight. Hopefully the ratings suck and UFC learns from it. This is the biggest boxing match since Conor/Floyd, in terms of anticipation, for some of us. So idk wtf UFC was thinking putting on this card to rival it. I guess I'm happier to have the fights than to have had it cancelled, but Mike and Roy is much more interesting. Even though it'll probably end in a fast and violent knockout.
 
Judging how good or bad a card is before you watch it is pure idiocy

I wouldn't go that far. It's inconclusive, sure, but usually one has some idea whether a champion will put on a better fight than somebody who's 1 - 2 in the organisation, for example.
 
Back
Top