I'm going to answer to this question because I definitely have way too much free time on my hands.
This is the list of lies or false statement Wallace did in the video:
-He claimed there were nobody with grappling experience at UFC 1, "they were six strikers and a sumo guy, no grapplers", but that's wrong, Shamrock was a submission wrestler.
-He claimed nobody know how to defend Royce's double leg and that's the only reason he won.
Except Shamrock sprawled on Royce's double leg and put him on his butt, and lost anyway.
Also, why he is not talking about how there were plenty of good grapplers (sambo guys, judo guys and wrestler) in UFC 2 and 4 and Royce won them anyway?
It doesn't make sense to limit his argument to UFC 1 since the following events had the same format, happened in the same period and were really just an extension of the first.
-He claimed Royce choked Shamrock with his belt, which is false, it was a regular RNC like showed in the pictures in this very thread.
-He claimed people other than Royce were not allowed to wear uniforms from their sport, but that's also false, Art Jimmerson wore one boxing glove and in the following events there were plenty of judo and karate guys with their GI.
The only limitations were that if you decided to wear shoes you were not allowed to kick, and that you could not wear elbow pads and shin guards, full stop.
Art Davis explained it in his book "is that legal?".
-Then we have not only a lie, but also a logical contradiction between his own statements:
He told that the Sumo guy was declared defeated by the referee despite being unharmed and able to continue, because "the Gracie's knew he was too big for Royce to defeat him".
Not only the "he could have continued" statement is a lie (Telia Tuli was unable to continue because Gerard's kick shattered his nose and jaw), but it also contradict the premise that the fighters were handipicked because they were easy opponents for Royce.
If they handpicked the opponents, why pick an opponent they knew Royce was unable to beat and that they had to trick out of the tournament by declaring him unable to continue even if he wasn't? What if Telia easily squashed Gordeau and went on to fight Royce? Bill's logic doesn't make any sense.
Moreover Royce submitted Akebono, who was 100 lbs heavier than Tuli and a way better sumoka, Tuli was far from invicible for him.
I find likely they called him exactly because Royce submitting a 400 lbs behemoth would have sold BJJ very well.
Moreover Bill knew all along that Telia was too injured to keep fighting and the stoppage was the right call, as you can see in this old black belt magazine letter where he criticized the brutality of the UFC and he reported in detail the injuries Telia suffered, so he was consciously lying in the youtube video:
https://books.google.it/books?id=E9...iew=1&pg=PA16&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
To me it seem he disliked the Gracie's succes and how they exposed point Karate and traditional martial arts, hurting Bill's renowed status as a badass in the process, so at the time he tried to boycot the UFC by playing the "it's too barbaric, we should not allow it" card.
Now in 2021 the ship has sailed because MMA has become extremely popular and it's totally accepted as a combat sport by the public, so he changed tactic and tried to hurt their legimatacy with this "conspiracy" crap video on youtube.