Pecker Problems (Mueller+ Investigation Thread v. 21)

[AndroidRage]

It should be.

And I am not saying he should have the power to unilateral act and wipe out other departments. I am saying it should instantly trigger those who do have the power to investigate and potentially shut down corrupt departments to act and to determine if they agree or not. Either a finding that the POTUS is correct and changes should be made happens or they fkind against him and in so doing show a lack of confidence in the POTUS that requires change.

The issue is here that there seems to be this thought that such comments by the POTUS are inconsequential. They are not. They should be immediately actionable.

Trump IS the corrupt department tho

 

[MikeMcMann]

Trump IS the corrupt department tho

Well that is what the investigation by Congress or others should find and act on then.

 

[WaylonMercy5150]

I find so hilarious that McCain doesn't want Trump anywhere near his funeral service. What a loser trump is. "Keep those Beverly hillbillies away from my funeral."

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Well that is what the investigation by Congress or others should find and act on then.

"... any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of president Donald Trump..."

"... any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

I find so hilarious that McCain doesn't want Trump anywhere near his funeral service. What a loser trump is. "Keep those Beverly hillbillies away from my funeral."

A man who served with honor and distinction naturally wants nothing to do with a man whose distinction is that he's without honor

 

[WaylonMercy5150]

A man who served with honor and distinction naturally wants nothing to do with a man whose distinction is that he's without honor

"Trump to speak at Gary Glitters funeral."

 

[7437]

I simply do not think you understand what my arguments are.

If the POTUS as the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the US says ANY of the departments within the judiciary in the US are rife with corruption that should IMMEDIATELY create a crisis of confidence. At a minimum the Senate and Congress should be acting on it to either support the Presidents position or they find against him which establishes a lack of confidence in the POTUS and thus his needed removal.

What should not happen is that the comments simply stand that the Institutions are rife with corruption and incompetence.

His statements should NECESSITATE some action being taken IMMEDIATELY.

Is there any other instance where you would support this as per my examples above:

---------

For example answer these question if this was anyone but Trump:

1 : A new Sheriff is sworn in and within a year claims he has found his entire department to be rife with corruption

2 : A new head Prosecutor is hired and within a year says he has found corruption in all the prosecutors working within his office

3 : A new Attorney General is sworn in and says within a year he has found systemic corruption at all levels through out the DoJ

Is there any case here where you or anyone would just suggest keep trucking along and the status quo should remain and we should just ignore the boss OR is that something we only say when its the POTUS making those accusations?

The president can not be removed for being an idiot.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

The president can not be removed for being an idiot.

Maybe we should change that

 

[7437]

Maybe we should change that

Tempting. You'd have to decide who gets to make that call though, which would be problematic.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Tempting. You'd have to decide who gets to make that call though, which would be problematic.

I nominate @Clippy

 

[Clippy]

I nominate @Clippy

What call am I making?

Let's do this!

Am I still Minister of office supplies @HomerThompson

I got this shit

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

What call am I making?

Let's do this!

Am I still Minister of office supplies @HomerThompson

I got this shit

You're the call maker sirrah, the calls are yours to make.
You can eject any player from the game as you see fit.

War Roomers and Presidents best not be arguing balls and strikes with Clippy

 

[MikeMcMann]

"... any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of president Donald Trump..."

"... any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."

I am not sure why you are quoting that too me??

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

I am not sure why you are quoting that too me??

I've examined your post, and my response to it. There's really only one logical conclusion to draw from the exchange.

I'm incredibly sexy.

 

[WaylonMercy5150]

Trump colored the flag wrong. lol

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Trump colored the flag wrong. lol

And isn't that a homo rainbow behind him? Lefties are forcing the gay agenda into our children's classrooms??

 

[WaylonMercy5150]

And isn't that a homo rainbow behind him? Lefties are forcing the gay agenda into our children's classrooms??

It will help cut down on teenage pregnancy.

 

[Quipling]

Emails, journal writings, documents written and found in a safe, are all admissible. Writings are admissible. If they search your office and find a written note, a confession or admission, it is admissible. They do not need to hear you say it first hand.

2. yes credibility is automatically conferred with the Presidency thus why he is AUTOMATICALLY given certain powers and security clearance and DOES NOT have to prove he deserves it over time.

3. Wrong. Wide Scale dismissal of cases being brought forth have occured when a prosecutor or certain cops have been proven to be corrupt. That, in and of itself can be seen as reasonable doubt and therefore the new powers that be would not want to pursue those cases until they could do so again with fresh eyes and not relying on the evidence gathered by the corrupt officials.

1. No. You are still incorrect. Documents, emails, etc are not automatically admissible to establish the truth of the matters asserted in them. They still run against the hearsay problem unless they fit within one of the hearsay exceptions. A written confession fits under 804(3), and is still subject to further restrictions outlined in that rule.

Spoiler

(3) Statement Against Interest. A statement that:

(A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made, it was so contrary to the declarant’s proprietary or pecuniary interest or had so great a tendency to invalidate the declarant’s claim against someone else or to expose the declarant to civil or criminal liability; and

(B) is supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its trustworthiness, if it is offered in a criminal case as one that tends to expose the declarant to criminal liability.

2. There is a difference between being given presidential powers pursuant to Article II and being deemed credible for the purpose of court proceedings. Presumably you can distinguish the two.

3. No, you're still wrong. Repeating your incorrect belief does not change that. Again, its not enough to show that the officials are corrupt in a general sense - you must show a specific violation that tainted your case. For example, that specific evidence was unlawfully obtained. I do not know where you obtained your belief, but it is not correct.

 

[syct23]

Trump colored the flag wrong. lol

He was coloring it just fine...

For a Russian flag..

 

[Joe]

Love how Republicans know trump is crooked/incompetent but too afraid to even investigate since they should be investigating this.