Pecker Problems (Mueller+ Investigation Thread v. 21)

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Why'd you have to get all librul with your no unusual punishments stance...

I would support tattooing the 1st Amendment on his fat face

 

[LangfordBarrow]

And do you think no rich foreigners found a way to funnel money to Hillary’s campaign?


This is literally how politics works. I’m not sure why democrats think feigning outrage at this shit makes it any more important. And FFS, the country is doing so well liberals should start thanking the Russians.


PS, The candidates at the top are so many levels separated from these transactions, nothing ever comes of it. This won’t be it.

Keep making excuses. We'll know you're right when you post a picture eating on china plates while Trump's still president.

 

[bobgeese]

It isn't always for their benefit. .

Trump did not start his charity out of the kindness of his heart.

I assume he did it at the direction of his accountant...

 

[bobgeese]

We'll know you're right when you post a picture eating on china plates while Trump's still president.

 

[vengeful]

I’m sure you realize the rich all donate to charity, and I hope you realize it’s for their benefit.

This isn't your original statement, you said a tax write off is the reason Trump started his own charity. Stop moving goalposts and admit you know nothing.

 

[Andy Capp]

This is a beautiful twist.

Ready Ohr not, here comes justice

Nah, Mueller gets a Patton the back

 

[bobgeese]

This isn't your original statement, you said a tax write off is the reason Trump started his own charity. Stop moving goalposts and admit you know nothing.

I apologize if the term tax write off being used as a catch all for the various fuckery performed by accountants who specialize in getting millionaires tax rates as low as possible, especially through the numerous charity loopholes, was not specific enough for shartdog.

Reminder, we’re currently in a thread with pecker in the title.



PS, you’re a retard if you think Trump started his charity to benefit anyone but himself.

 

[curryjunkie]

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Trump did not start his charity out of the kindness of his heart.

I assume he did it at the direction of his accountant...

Trump is not a philanthropist he's an opportunist.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Hahaha, ok, you got me. Enjoy washing the dishes.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

I apologize if the term tax write off being used as a catch all for the various fuckery performed by accountants who specialize in getting millionaires tax rates as low as possible, especially through the numerous charity loopholes, was not specific enough for shartdog.

Reminder, we’re currently in a thread with pecker in the title.



PS, you’re a retard if you think Trump started his charity to benefit anyone but himself.

We all know he started it to benefit himself. He's morally and ethically bankrupt.

 

[vengeful]

I apologize if the term tax write off being used as a catch all for the various fuckery performed by accountants who specialize in getting millionaires tax rates as low as possible, especially through the numerous charity loopholes, was not specific enough for shartdog.

Reminder, we’re currently in a thread with pecker in the title.



PS, you’re a retard if you think Trump started his charity to benefit anyone but himself.

what charity loophole reduces someone's taxes by more than the amount they donated?

 

[Gandhi]

That's a good point. I have been consistent in stating that the Republicans were wrong to impeach President Clinton for perjury.

Well to be fair this is a rare occasion where I think that’s a shitty reason to go after trump. Dems need to have a higher standard than the republicans, ie more than sex payoff to Clifford to impeach.

 

[bobgeese]

what charity loophole reduces someone's taxes by more than the amount they donated?

You realize there are a multitude of reasons why the rich would donate to charity for personal gain, right?

And even if you’re an accountant, unless you’re specifically working in that specific field, these guys have forgotten more about saving millionaires money than you’ll ever know.


PS, I already posted 3 different charity loopholes used by Romney. Rich people gonna rich.

 

[KONG-D'SNT-TAP]

And do you think no rich foreigners found a way to funnel money to Hillary’s campaign?


This is literally how politics works. I’m not sure why democrats think feigning outrage at this shit makes it any more important. And FFS, the country is doing so well liberals should start thanking the Russians.


PS, The candidates at the top are so many levels separated from these transactions, nothing ever comes of it. This won’t be it.

It’s illegal. Now find proof Hillary did this and then we can talk. Until that time kindly shut the fuck up

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

As I pointed out to another poster, your source for this is an almost totally redacted, unauthorized leak of a secret conversation by an anonymous source. We don't have context. It's not wise to take it seriously, in my opinion.

I don't recall ever hearing this point disputed by Trump or his team, just them bitching about how it was leaked, which is telling. Maybe now they will try to discredit it, or try to equivocate like they are doing now with the Holt interview, as they want to distract from the fruit of the Mueller investigation by trying to change the focus on why the tree was planted in the first place.

As for the "president's explanation straight from his mouth" that "he fired Comey for being an "incompetent grandstander" who had left the FBI "in turmoil", as we saw, it was all hugs and kisses from Trump to Comey before he knew Comey wasn't going to go soft on the Russia Investigation, and after the "grandstanding" and "showboating" occured. As for the FBI being in turmoil, I write that off as being typical of Trump's histrionic hyperbole when he is trying to discredit something. And the way Trump put his thoughts together in that interview, how he brought up the "Russia thing" when he did in the context of talking about how he was going to fire Comey regardless of recommendation, was him giving the real reason of why he fired Comey.

As for your question/point about if "Trump's team was saying Trump wouldn't have fired Comey if not for the Rosenstein recommendation," Trump's team was selling Rosenstein's recommendation (not to mention selling Rosenstein's ethics and credentials while doing this) very hard as the reason why Comey was being fired, as they were trying to take the focus away from any connection of the firing being related to the Russia thing, which apparently Comey and Rosenstein ended up being concerned that it was.

 

[kahiljabroni]

Ok, seriously, has Trump not been acting like all the departments in government are there to serve him? "I'm going to get involved", "these guy owe me loyalty", blah blah blah.

He's hidden his own finances, continues to use his office to enrich himself, and just constantly lies all the time. Is this the guy you admire? Aren't you interested in seeing what the investigation turns up?

Sounds like a bunch of baseless claims. Yeh I do admire him. I sent him there to do a job and he's doing it

 

[vengeful]

You realize there are a multitude of reasons why the rich would donate to charity for personal gain, right?

And even if you’re an accountant, unless you’re specifically working in that specific field, these guys have forgotten more about saving millionaires money than you’ll ever know.


PS, I already posted 3 different charity loopholes used by Romney. Rich people gonna rich.

Yes, and do you realize you were the one that initially implied the only reason Trump started his charity was for a tax write-off?

Lol you made a claim you can't support and instead of just admitting it you choose to lash out at me.... Sad!

PS. Only one was a gain for Romney.

 

[Darkballs]

They all broke laws, only morons were calling for impeachment. Of course, Clinton was impeached, because he lied under oath. That was the wrong thing to do.

So now you're admitting that trump broke the law. You're just trying to say that Obama and Hillary did too.

So you were completely wrong in all previous predictions, and now are just making the worlds shittiest "two wrongs" argument.

When that's the best the WR's most fervent trump supporter can do, you know he's fucked.

Hope they paid you in advance bob. You did a terrible job at advancing his defense.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

So now you're admitting that trump broke the law. You're just trying to say that Obama and Hillary did too.

So you were completely wrong in all previous predictions, and now are just making the worlds shittiest "two wrongs" argument.

When that's the best the WR's most fervent trump supporter can do, you know he's fucked.

Hope they paid you in advance bob. You did a terrible job at advancing his defense.

Why should Bob be any different than Rudy?