Law ***PAYBACK: Barr Assigns Top Prosecutor to Russia BS / UPDATE REPORT LEAKS START***

Is this IT?


  • Total voters
    94
Status
Not open for further replies.
Holy shit.

You sounded just like a Centrist.

Should I contact the Mods and let them know @hillelslovak87 was hacked? :eek::eek::eek:

:D


Seriously, though, you are correct. It seems we've all taken sides in this Presidency as far as Political Parties go.

It's basically now :

"My side is better than your side!! So NYAAAAH!"

"OH YEAH?? Well MY side is better than your side and your side Smells funny!! So there! NYAAAAAAHH!! "


We should all step back from the ledge and realize this :

Politicians(and Corrupt Businessmen) have all the money and we don't. Us arguing about them whether it's FOR or AGAINST them won't make much difference in our lives except giving us something to bitch about.

Remember the good old days where we spent more time in the UFC Discussion thread than here? I miss those days.

I joined in 2017. You're the old man in the post apocalypse movie talking about how great running water was before the cannibals eat his balls.
 
Flag on the play. Using a fancy $5 word on a martial-arts sub-forum regarding politics.
iStock_000001201659Medium-200x300.jpg

That Pic :

serveimage
 
I've got a 1-pack.....except it's shaped like Fat Albert. #HeyHeyHey!

Fat Albert is code for sitting in your room in a red shirt while Dr. Cosby does pushups in the living room with your mom while she sleeps.
 
Including the lettered sections' numbered sub headers, which detail specific actions, we can see 24 instances, along with a couple redacted matters.

The Table of Contents is available at the top of the report.

lolz @ 24.

i named and counted 2. you can't even cite an additional ONE, let alone 22 more.
 
Fat Albert is code for sitting in your room in a red shirt while Dr. Cosby does pushups in the living room with your mom while she sleeps.

Seriously?

Damn whippersnappers and their Urban-Dictionary Slang terms. *proceeds to yell at clouds, too*
 
and yet, you can't cite ONE. let alone 22+.

Which is why I gave you the entire report, which contains said sub headers in the table of contents that detail what you pretend was just one little hack and a few shitposts.
 
Which is why I gave you the entire report, which contains said sub headers in the table of contents that detail what you pretend was just one little hack and a few shitposts.

...umm... you should read the report. or not. keep arguing poorly, in complete ignorance about the same thing you didn't read. across 2 threads. whatever floats your boat.
 
This thread is ruining the rest of the war room and should be sent to the great beyond or deleted altogether.
 
...umm... you should read the report. or not. keep arguing poorly, in complete ignorance about the same thing you didn't read. across 2 threads. whatever floats your boat.

I have read the report in full, save the redactions, of course. When you read something that deep in scope, you're able to see the nuance and breadth of something. This helps you avoid making foolish statements betraying your lack of ability to proffer anything but simple minded generalizations about the contents.
 
I have read the report in full, save the redactions, of course. When you read something that deep in scope, you're able to see the nuance and breadth of something. This helps you avoid making foolish statements betraying your lack of ability to proffer anything but simple minded generalizations about the contents.

that's a lot of words to say that you're backpedaling.
 
By all means provide me being a DNC shill, then.

Also, have you read the Mueller Report, by chance?

This didn't age well, seeing that you were outed as yourself not reading the report.

Also, as I've said many times. Provide 3 posts where you attack the DNC and/or support Trump. You know, because u keep saying you are not a Schill even though your posts 100% show you to be one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top