what's the thing about the kilo name, analogy to cocaine?
Im from a metric system country, so kilo is a everyday thing and I wouldn't do the first association with drugs.
Sure, but there are far fewer people in the ocean than there is on land, and very few people will ever interact with a shark, knowingly or unknowingly. Sharks mind their business for the most part. It's not a good comparison. The domestic animal argument works just fine. Pits do seem to hold the title for fatal domestic animal attacks.
america is a fairly dog loving country, they love them more than they do children, and while there are probably not enough deaths to ban the dogs, the sheer violence from those dogs are probably underreported. In certain parts of los angeles, it's not uncommon to see those dogs get loose and roam with no owner, and while they might not kill, they can and do seriously injure people and go unreported..... getting a bill to ban the dog might now happen, however legislation that says that dangerous looking dogs can be killed on sight by law enforcement would be a good way of notifying owners to take care of your business.
It's not as disproportionate as you think. Over 40% of the world's population lives within 50 miles of the ocean, and over 70% of the world's shark population lives & roams within 10 miles of shore.
philes? There's nearly 700K of them in the USA. The vast majority of those live outside prisons. We know that sex offenders against children have among the highest rates of recidivism of all criminals. Once a diddler, always a diddler. Due to this, they disproportionately wield a huge threat to our children relative to all citizens who haven't yet been convicted of an offense; fortunately, most never will...but some will. However, reminding ourselves of the Minority Report moral lesson, just because we know they are the most likely to be victimizers in the future doesn't mean they will be. Furthermore, similar to Pit Bulls, probably somewhere close to 99.9% of them won't commit a sexual offense this year.
Well, you're just comparing offenders, so that's an easy question to answer. You put them down. For your PDF file comparison to work, it would be under the assumption that all humans have the mere potential to be one, and we would be deciding the fate of the entire species over that "potential". You're judging an entire species over the actions of a relative few. I wouldn't think it would be fair to judge the entire species on that trait they may or may not have.
That's precisely the point. We don't know which humans will commit this crime. Until we do, everyone is a potential offender. This is merely to set up the consideration of probabilities of offense between the two groups; those who have offended in the past (Pit Bulls), and those who haven't (all other breeds). The disparity in the analogy is that Pit Bulls haven't necessarily already offended to be considered an acute threat, but that's irrelevant to this portion of the analogy.
- Rots are far bigger, more powerful. But pits populations far outnumber them.
- They are here. BUt the low-lifes still find them and let them reprocude, after that, they throw the dogs out.
- We had a thread on the mayberry, theres several more sharks interactions with humans than what we used to think before. Drones capture them all the time, very close to swimmers at beaches, and theres rarelly any attack. And those filmed were great withe sharks.
- Pits are still average sized dogs, they arent Alabai or ovcharka, their destructive power is far overrated.
Brah, I've seen clips of pitbulls attacking horses and cattle like retards because they got too much game in them LOL
- I've seen that one that tryied his lucky against a Moose. But not all of them are that stupid.
Probably about half of them
I'd stay away from Dobermans. Im not an expert, but it seems they have a genetic flaw that makes their brain grow more than their skull. So they start to get crazy after a while.
It is, the kids would prolly start to outsmart you at every turn.
- We rarelly see them tryng against bigger dogs.
- I think that was a mith.
Is it? Idk, when i was little living in Brazil it used to be a kinda common dog, and every one of them went berserk as they got older. My grandpa had one that was a wreck, he had to give him away (i was little, he prolly put it down too, but that was what he told us)
