- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Messages
- 48,744
- Reaction score
- 106,631
It's very good but it appears great relative to the diminished quality of the average UFC card. In terms of recent cards it's on par with something like 256.
To be fair, it STARTED much better.UFC 200 was supposed to be as well...
![]()
We all remember how that event went.
The sad part is this is a typical UFC card back in the day they just smacked titles on there. I like having an event every week but back in the day when there was one PPV every other month those cards were good top to bottom. They also didn't have any shit fighters because they didn't have the events for it. I'm not a good person with knowing which UFC number was what so I typed in UFC 50 and top to bottom MMA fans know who everyone is. They also kept being good close to modern day.
View attachment 838256
Yeah I think skill wise WMMA isn't there yet. I think Dana was sorta right in that sense. I got to be honest though I live near Rochester NY and the best fight we saw was Sajara Eubanks vs Aspen Ladd. They were so sloppy it was great to watch and I agree that it needs to be in place for equality.They've doubled the amount of categories too. By adding 145, 135, 125 and a couple of women's divisions, we now have 5 new "Champions".
I know most people don't agree, but the further removed from HW, the less I'm interested. And regarding WMMA, it needs to go away.
I think this card has something like 15 total fights. 3 flyweight, 4 Bantam weight, and 2 WMMA. 9/15 fights on this card would never have existed in the good old days.
I won't be paying for this card.
I mean since the UFC has changed their model to more is better we haven't had that. I'm pretty confident that many of the unknowns won't be known at the end of this.That's the issue with looking back at cards, who knows in five years we might look back at this one and say "wow, Uros Medic was on that card"