ONE: Northcutt KOd in 29 Seconds

You are beating boxer-stylists in MMA fights? Or in striking fights with Karate-based rulesets?

I would take prime Pat Miletich or Firas Zahabi over every single Karate master from Okinawa in an MMA fight.
Now the one with preconceptions is you. Carefully review the kumite videos. They are not doing reverse punch... side stance.. .that is what YOU SEE.

Miletich bores me. He's a lunk. Firas is very knowledgeable and puts on good training demos. But the overall program of Zahabi would be pressed to tackle the black-belt in karate, a bona fine one.

Again, we are limited over the internet. I can post another vid....
 
Except Wonderboy wasn't fighting cans, he was fighting former champions and title contenders in Hendricks/Rory/Masvidal/Till. Again, historical revisionism at it's finest to help you make your point.

Yep, those were some decent MMA competitors.

ROFLMAO didn't realize I was lecturing you, especially when I went out of my way to literally state:

"I hope you don't take this as me telling you that you are wrong, I'm just offering my own perspective/analysis"

I guess giving an opinion that differs from yours is lecturing you though, so I better just agree with everything you state as sacrosanct o_O
I meant that in a collegiate way. Again, the limitations of the forum enviroment.

If this training method is so "super-elite" and superior to other martial arts then why isn't it being utilized as a basis for more high-level MMA fighters?
Simple. And this has been discussed and answered on MMA forums before. Particularly according to your last post which I have affirmed.

It's an aptitude & dedication factors issue. In summary. Both Sage and Thompson are more sporty guys who want to go out there and mix it up with a lot of physical action & technique.

Beyond that, your question is rhetorical.

Is the talent pool shallow?

Well, we have to define talent. But by-in-large, yes. A karate black-belt, takes 3, 5, 7 years before your'e ready for heavy competition like the UFC. Most karate practitioners aren't that serious. So the pool of talented karate black-belts is much smaller too.

The UFC doesn't invest in it's competitors in any meaningful way training way. They're virtually on their own. And this is one of the lessons of karate training. To realize how serious competent training is.

On the more MMA side, I think BJJ as a style recognizes this also. Takes a long time to become a bona fide black-belt in BJJ. Complicated.

Do the competitors not like to cross-train in other martial arts that involve grappling?

Do you mean karate or MMA? TAM has a good wrestling / BJJ program on paper. Striking, they have some boxing & Muay Thai. Sage blew up.

Honest questions - if you sincerely believe what you are saying you should have a good explanation for this since the cause and effect doesn't add up. Would seem pretty evident if Karate was the best base skill for MMA then we'd see far more high-level MMA fighters with that background/style....and yet we haven't for 20+ years....

Again, rhetorical. Not many people including karate players want to take on the rigors of MMA, both on the full contact end & on the commercial end. Dana White isn't going to put any words in my mouth. And Dana White has an excellent formula for promoting MMA... he's seminal in creating the success of the business. Not martial arts though.

Bro you honestly need to read what you are writing - it literally sums up to "if you only trained karate like I have you would see that I'm right." That's all well and good but it isn't any way to formulate an argument - it's literally like telling someone they haven't trained in the art so they don't know how effective it is. I could say the exact thing about BJJ (or any other martial art) and it would hold the same exact weight, except in my case I could post countless examples of high-level BJJ (or Muy Thai or Boxing or Wrestlers) that have transitioned that martial art effectively to high-level MMA. And yet you can't do the same with Karate. You might even be right, but that's not any way to make an argument for it.

Actually, if you wade through what I wrote, I didn't say that. I'm challenging MMA to think harder and better about karate. Any BTW, when you step into that Octagon, to win you have better be right. Otherwise the legacy of Sage is waiting for you. He's not typing analyst pieces.

And BTW, and poster just told me the same objection in that I hadn't trained boxing or Muay Thai. I train to beat them.

Again, all I did was present some material over the internet for the open minded like yourself to consider. I've been challenged by wrestlers, kickboxers, boxers, karatekas in my and other styles. One school where I defeated the head instructor when he challenged me, simply didn't invite me back. Sore losers abound no matter what the style

Wonderboy was terrible karate-wise in fights where he got a majority draw and a split-decision lost against a top-5 all-time WW that has insanely dangerous wrestling? You really see the MMA world through rose-colored lenses, it's not going to be possible to convince someone that believes they are better than the highest-level MMA fighters we have ever seen. You have thousands of hours of training and study - could you take Wonderboy in an MMA fight? Could you even make it competitive? If you can't take him or wouldn't even make it close, then what good is all that training in the context of MMA?

Here's the weakness of your position, and it's not because you don't have facts. But it's a very specious argument which avoids the actual principles of what makes martial arts works... then how well can one do them.

The martial question for us, you and me, is not the ranking, and quoting of statistics, it's WHY WONDERBOY LOST. One global question: WHY?

This is the difference between being an observer and a practitioner doing the art first hand. All karate currcilums of today have kumite as a component. All belt rank tests require sparring. Moreover, there are all kinds of tournament a karateka can attend. So to win, you have to do the RIGHT thing. It's not an abstraction, some abstraction in practice.

Except we almost never see high-level Karate fighters in MMA that have developed solid-grappling for Mixed Rules combat, you can literally count them on one-hand. We do however see tons of high-level BJJ/Wrestlers that have learned how to strike and tons of high-level Boxer/Muy Thai guys that have learned how to grapple and defend takedowns.

We are getting to the limits again. I choose not to do any MMA (for the most part) outside of what I came across in TMA schools. But your arguments have a bias, of what the present conventions are in MMA. These are the kinds of issue which are only effectively addressed in person. Through study & training.

I think you are incredibly over-reliant on Karate as being an "end-all" martial art that has superior technique and counters for every approach in MMA. Just like every other martial art it has lots of benefits and lots of downsides. However it seems to formulate the mentality which you profess here, as being a "single-art" solution to a "multi-art problem." Maybe this is why we've seen such little cross-over success in MMA from Karate-based fighters, they are so confident in the superiority of their martial art that they don't cross-train and their style never adapts to become good enough to rise through the ranks of elite MMA fighters (just one theory).

Again, you're now arguing your conclusion is the analysis. I've posted a ton of stuff and now you're the one in the wrong if you think an internet discussion can bring you up to competence in karate in and in a day or two.

That's not how I remember it at all - I remember it being an absolutely brutal, grinding fight where Brown walked through tough shots to force the clinch and work trips and then just gas Wonderboy out from top position by always grinding and looking to do damage. I never once thought Brown was taking it easy on him or not trying to finish; Wonderboy was fighting a far more experienced guy that actually had other skillsets (like clinch-fighting and grappling) so when he was getting lit up from the outside he could just push into other positions where he was superior.

Okay, you are looking at it through different lenses, I stated that. You see (A) because of your MMA pwerspective and I (B) see my accomplished karate perspective. Surprise, different views. We can agree it was a tough fight for both?

Your initial posts were appreciated and offered some nuanced perspective into Karate. Your recent ones have veered into biased rants about the superiority of your preferred art without any relevant examples because of obtuse deflections (i.e. a keyboard can't do justice, you need to study thousands of hours like I have, here's a video of high-level karate guys that proves they would dominate in MMA).

End of the line bro.

You don't have to condescend to make a point with the "you're welcome" either.

Nice start. What are you going to do next beside inhabit a forum to learn about karate? Ball's in your court.

&Your welcome.
 
Last edited:
Yep, those were some decent MMA competitors.


I meant that in a collegiate way. Again, the limitations of the forum enviroment.


Simple. And this has been discussed and answered on MMA forums before. Particularly according to your last post which I have affirmed.

It's an aptitude & dedication factors issue. In summary. Both Sage and Thompson are more sporty guys who want to go out there and mix it up with a lot of physical action & technique.

Beyond that, your question is rhetorical.



Well, we have to define talent. But by-in-large, yes. A karate black-belt, takes 3, 5, 7 years before your'e ready for heavy competition like the UFC. Most karate practitioners aren't that serious. So the pool of talented karate black-belts is much smaller too.

The UFC doesn't invest in it's competitors in any meaningful way training way. They're virtually on their own. And this is one of the lessons of karate training. To realize how serious competent training is.

On the more MMA side, I think BJJ as a style recognizes this also. Takes a long time to become a bona fide black-belt in BJJ. Complicated.



Do you mean karate or MMA? TAM has a good wrestling / BJJ program on paper. Striking, they have some boxing & Muay Thai. Sage blew up.



Again, rhetorical. Not many people including karate players want to take on the rigors of MMA, both on the full contact end & on the commercial end. Dana White isn't going to put any words in my mouth. And Dana White has an excellent formula for promoting MMA... he's seminal in creating the success of the business. Not martial arts though.



Actually, if you wade through what I wrote, I didn't say that. I'm challenging MMA to think harder and better about karate. Any BTW, when you step into that Octagon, to win you have better be right. Otherwise the legacy of Sage is waiting for you. He's not typing analyst pieces.

And BTW, and poster just told me the same objection in that I hadn't trained boxing or Muay Thai. I train to beat them.

Again, all I did was present some material over the internet for the open minded like yourself to consider. I've been challenged by wrestlers, kickboxers, boxers, karatekas in my and other styles. One school where I defeated the head instructor when he challenged me, simply didn't invite me back. Sore losers abound no matter what the style



Here's the weakness of your position, and it's not because you don't have facts. But it's a very specious argument which avoids the actual principles of what makes martial arts works... then how well can one do them.

The martial question for us, you and me, is not the ranking, and quoting of statistics, it's WHY WONDERBOY LOST. One global question: WHY?

This is the difference between being an observer and a practitioner doing the art first hand. All karate currcilums of today have kumite as a component. All belt rank tests require sparring. Moreover, there are all kinds of tournament a karateka can attend. So to win, you have to do the RIGHT thing. It's not an abstraction, some abstraction in practice.



We are getting to the limits again. I choose not to do any MMA (for the most part) outside of what I came across in TMA schools. But your arguments have a bias, of what the present conventions are in MMA. These are the kinds of issue which are only effectively addressed in person. Through study & training.



Again, you're now arguing your conclusion is the analysis. I've posted a ton of stuff and now you're the one in the wrong if you think an internet discussion can bring you up to competence in karate in and in a day or two.



Okay, you are looking at it through different lenses, I stated that. You see A because of your MMA pwerspective and I see my accomplished karate perspective. Surprise, different views. We can agree it was a tough fight for both?



End of the line bro.



Nice start. What are you going to do next beside inhabit a forum to learn about karate? Ball's in your court. &Your welcome.

p.s. What's Sage gonna do next?
 
You are beating boxer-stylists in MMA fights? Or in striking fights with Karate-based rulesets?

I would take prime Pat Miletich or Firas Zahabi over every single Karate master from Okinawa in an MMA fight.

Not gonna pretend I read all the posts ITT but....Kikuno would ruin Friar Zahabi

rr0278.jpg

200.gif

KK5.gif
 
Not gonna pretend I read all the posts ITT but....Kikuno would ruin Friar Zahabi
Yeah, smart move... I penned a lot of dribble.

There's this myth in MMA land that karate fighters are mostly 1-dimensional. We see this thinking where that Shincheckin' poster went to boxing to round out his Muay Thai failings. Of course it's a smart move to make overall, addressing ones' weaknesses. But it leads many of MMA thinking that their original style or that a choosen style is necessarily flawed, instead of questioning their personal interpretation.

We see this with the description of karate kumite as "...leaping, jumping quickly in & trying to land that punch first." Which then is how they characterize karate, or rather reverse characterize it. This is the sin of the typical MMA kind of thinking.

What is missed by this perspective is the capability for dynamic action generated by karate / karate-related training.
Sage Northcutt gets Knocked Out in 29 seconds
1,437,787 views


MMACrazyTV.com
Published on May 17, 2019
Sage Northcutt gets KO' ed in 29 seconds by Cosmo Alexandre at One Championship Enter the Dragon

Mr. Shincheckin? has been involved in two videos of recent depicting different qualities relevant to Sages' failure. One, he has a demo of strong Muay Thai kicks and strikes. Two, he talks about the lead leg kick. The latter having some difficulty in generating muscular power.

Sage by One, throws a Wonderboy knock off of a lead leg round kick... & according to Two, bounces harmlessly off. The announcer, in the very brief moments of the fight, talks up Sage as a karate champion? Champion of what?

Shincheckin's? technique video puts on a display of him persistently advancing with a number of strong techniques. Sage runs from the fight, hesitantly throws a weak, last ditch effort.

MMA fighters would do well to check into resource outside their narrow sphere. Shincheckin's Muay Thai isn't playing around. Sages' 'karate' is pure play. Don't do that. Cuteness doesn't count in full contact.
 
Last edited:
I'm mainly interested on how martial arts work in an MMA context. Karate teaches so many techniques for so many situations, but it doesn't seem to teach how to apply those techniques in a never-ending flowing model (i.e. endlessly chaining techniques together in a free-flowing format).
After reading other material likely posted by you, I couldn't glean the particular meaning in this question-statement.

I was training karate @ a kung fu school private lessons. My position was that karate (a simpler one like mine) was a lot more dynamic than other styles be it boxing or kung fu or whatever were giving it credit for. The kung fu instructor said in reply:

"Karate is kung fu without the flow." So through you eyes of settling on Wing chun, your view is correct. Flow is kinda of generality of the difference yet it's a fair characterization nonetheless.

By that comparison, I could say, "Boxing is karate without the flow." Now this is somewhat less correct and turns into a yes & no, depending on what aspect is being addressed. In practice, however, boxing can have a lot of flow & flow very well.

But to look at your overall position and objections to karate for MMA, the characteristics you see in karate kumite as too narrow or fraught with technical issues or rule sets... which as I said can't be taught in an internet lesson, the bottom line is you're focusing on the wrong details. Overall though, you have the required aptitude to learn the value & practice of traditional martial arts be it karate or wing chun. Level to be determined. This talent or aptitude is what is missing in the classic MMA coach, competitor.

All of your questions & suppositions were pertinent and heading in the right direction always. I've interacted with many instructors of many styles as well as a number of instructors within my style to arrive at where I did and that's with a relatively simple form of karate which then isn't so simple. Let me just try to summarize with that vid I never put up.
10 Killer Combos for Kickboxing, Muay Thai and MMA
47 views


First Strike Athletics
Published on May 28, 2019
[link omitted]
SUBSCRIBE 129
In this video I show you 10 combinations that can be used for Muay Thai, Kickboxing and MMA. They can be used for Western Boxing as well!I show you how to add kicks and/or body punches as well, and how to move after the combo so you don’t get hit back when you’re done.


This is from the Striking Techniques Thread. I used another style to illustrate that when you say karate is doing this in kumite, trying to score a point and stop, off balance, not using uppercuts or combos enough, etc., here is a vid using all those combos. All of your observations had validiyt.

My point is we are using strikes in karate, we ARE NOT not doing combos in terms of some mechanical form as rundown here which obviously might prevail over the single technique / pause commonly seen in kumite competition.

Karate is not trying to outdo the opponent by applying a combo. The effectiveness of karate is HOW we are doing the single strike we may see in kumite and the principles behind that which will make the very competent practice of kick-boxing combos demonstrated here irrelevant against karate in MMA or anywhere else. The key word is HOW.

Wing chun aficionado, here's a clip of Donnie Yen.
☯ Best Fight EVER Donnie Yen vs 10 Japanese Ip Man /Yip man ☯
109,176 views


BestMAFights
Published on Mar 10, 2013

My limited understanding of Donnie Yen is that his Wing chun is legit, how much of that is up to Ip Man or some other bona fide Wing chun master I can't really say.

The truth is bona fide Wing Chun is going to defeat my karate & obliterate boxing or anything seen in MMA because it's not largely powered by the type of strength or action demonstrated in the Striking Combos Video. Apples to Oranges where the apples can't be matched by the oranges in terms of HOW. Not even close.

As I also said, however, practicing Wing Chun to it's TMA potential you are getting into the rarefied air of traditional martial arts. Dizzying heights. This is why you see the JKD & Wing chun fails / absence in MMA, one main driver is it takes extra mental talent & extraordinary effort to do it (The plethora of morons & clueless on YT talking as if they have the 'in' on Wing chun). The aptitude in terms of your thought process, is one of those necessary ingredients.

@TheMMAnalyst Don't judge karate's MMA book by it's cover. You'll lose.
 
Last edited:
You make a number of solid points that I don't disagree with at all - he got this far because of the UFC putting him against lower-level opposition. I would just say that even his lower-level opposition had far more skills (better BJJ/wrestling/striking) and better technique than him and the only reason he beat them was he was much stronger/faster...otherwise how do you explain how he won those fights?

I don't consider doing a flip an "athletic sport" (LOL) but I do consider it to be one sign of athleticism - no matter how much Bryan Barberena works to improve his leg muscles he will never have the explosiveness to pull off a standing front-flip or back-flip (even if he had started working towards it a long time ago he just doesn't have the genetics for it). But that isn't a skill/technique that translates to MMA, it just shows high-levels of output for explosive leg strength (which is a gauge of athletic capacity/potential). Sage will always have the capability to be a faster/more powerful kicker than Bryan because of this, but without all the intangibles he is not able to apply it so it doesn't really mean anything for him.

I see what you are saying about the NFL combine and it's an excellent point - athleticism only matters in the context of how you can apply it to a particular sport. So if we gauge Sage on an "MMA athleticism' stand-point he isn't able to effectively apply offensive/defensive techniques so it doesn't matter what his general athleticism is. When looking at athletic MMA ability things are much more tied into timing and making reads - it doesn't matter how fast or powerful Sage punches or kicks if he can't set-up the shots and he's wide-open to getting countered because he doesn't feint/keeps his chin straight-up/is tense and afraid so his movement is predictable.

To me Sage appears to be a natural athlete but not a natural fighter; he doesn't react well when he is hit, his skill-set and style aren't built for the current high-level MMA meta-game, and he doesn't seem to have inherently good timing or ability to make reads/adjustments in-fight based on his opponent. Isn't that all mental stuff though? Maybe it's a poor choice of phrase to call him an "elite athlete" then since he has never been elite in the athletic field he competes in (MMA); perhaps it's better to call him a "physical specimen" or something like that instead.

He is definitely more athletic than your average UFC fighter, he just lacks the other factors necessary to be successful.
 
A karate black-belt, takes 3, 5, 7 years before your'e ready for heavy competition like the UFC.

Christ, wouldn’t this be true for many other disciplines as well?

A true elite Wrestler needs 3,5,7 years before considering the UFC...

A BJJ blackbelt needs 3,5,7 years.....

A Muay Thai fighter needs 3,5,7 years....

A judoka needs 3,5,7 years....

Karate is a great art, but no more than any other.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top