- Joined
- Aug 6, 2004
- Messages
- 19,055
- Reaction score
- 9,808
weird, because i don't recall ever suggesting that glory/k1 was muay thai.
i referred to the dutch style as a variant of muay thai (ie: dutch vs traditional). and i referred to dutch fighters as muay thai. all of which fought under muay thai rules...
and now you backpedaled right back into ufc vs pride.
it seems that people here can't decide if mt is a general style/skill set or a rule set. so what's happened is some cherrypicking to pretend it's ludicrous that the dutch style/fighters mentioned aren't mt.
again, i was referring to a general style. then it was clear you clowns wanted it to be a rule set (lolz!) so i obliged. every fighter i mentioned has fought under mt rules. and i find it to be laughable to pretend they wouldn't have fared very well in muay thai during their primes. especially since MT orgs have pretty much always paid shit, so they don't have deep talent pools...
i referred to the dutch style as a variant of muay thai (ie: dutch vs traditional). and i referred to dutch fighters as muay thai. all of which fought under muay thai rules...
Yes the above people's skills are transferrable but it's not the same class of competition.
and now you backpedaled right back into ufc vs pride.
it seems that people here can't decide if mt is a general style/skill set or a rule set. so what's happened is some cherrypicking to pretend it's ludicrous that the dutch style/fighters mentioned aren't mt.
again, i was referring to a general style. then it was clear you clowns wanted it to be a rule set (lolz!) so i obliged. every fighter i mentioned has fought under mt rules. and i find it to be laughable to pretend they wouldn't have fared very well in muay thai during their primes. especially since MT orgs have pretty much always paid shit, so they don't have deep talent pools...
Last edited: