Yes. And I would love to hear your take on it. Ill post in couple hours.
Okey, maybe you have some examples like this picture in wikipedia article about Xing Yi Quan
6th picture in article with master Yang Hai?
Yes. And I would love to hear your take on it. Ill post in couple hours.
@Reyesnuthugr
Notice in particular when the back foot hits on the second fist. The back foot lands right as the fist makes contact with the opponent. This seem weird at first but when you get this all of the power generated from the forwards step is thrust upwards in a spiral that explodes out of the arm into the hand. Even the stomp of the back foot sends a shock wave through the body into the fist. The shoulders are rounded forward until the arm is extending and then they expand as you make contact.
Just a rough overview but it is an interesting way of incorporating frame and various muscle groups all into one punch which adds a lot of power when it is all timed right.
Interesting, thanks.
That actually makes sense about the back foot. A similar thing is done in boxing-- you don't want either foot to be off the ground when connecting, so if you have to step to get somewhere and punch, you need to put that foot back down quickly rather than leaving it up in the air where it's a liability to balance and leaks one's ability to create leverage.
I like the springyness of the arms and body (instead of the standard robotic wooden-ness favored by many TMAs, which kills the power)
I also really like the use of falling bodyweight when connecting. This is similar to "sitting down on your punches" which a surprising amount of modern boxers forget to do.
---
I've read a little about this style in the past but was never able to find any live demonstrations of it, it was one of the more well known (1 of the 3 major Internal schools) yet rare(ly practiced) styles.
I read that it was created in jail where the founder had an iron ball attached to one leg, so that's where the compact, linear footwork is from (has to work in that situation where you don't have a lot of space and cant take regular steps)
Pretty cool, thanks!
That is very observant and I might even be learning something from your observation. The main criticisms Victor Fu gets is from the "bounciness" which is his innovation of Sun Lu Tangs approach. If you have anything more to say about that I would appreciate it actually.....
marciano looked crude to some, but to me he is a marvel of punching efficiency and power. he didn't use any energy putting the brakes on his punches (traditional recovery of guard) he just covered himself with another punch or rolling at the end of the punch. he is the opposite of mayweather in that regard as mayweather has amazing defence at the expense of a bit of follow through.Well, we've noticed the prevalence of stiff "stop on a dime and leave it there" punching in TMAs like with TKD and karate. It "looks cool" and "feels cool" because it is an artificial substitute (fighting with movements emulating a robot) that incorrectly mimics what looks like control. When a person elects to exert themselves needlessly like this, they are using their own energy and commitment to decelerate their own momentum which they have worked to create in the first place. This kills the penetration and damage they would do if they had let it go.
All just to look cool and feel like something is being accomplished. It looks cool to spectators, who have no idea which way is up. It definitely draws new students for this reason: it's the exact opposite of subtle. People who don't know much assume a lot and have absurd egos to cater to. These demonstrations give them what they want.
---
Springiness is one way to keep the momentum alive while redirecting it instead of expending extra effort to stop it dead. Putting little circles on the end of somewhat straight lines of force to keep it going (either for penetration on contact [like a whip] or redirection it for further use) rather than cancelling it (why cancel it? It's like turning your car OFF every time you drive a foot) by counteracting it using opposite effort/contraction.
Boxers tend to make more use of some looser yet still compact circles (follow through), which allows them to continue their momentum/energy without needing to tense up and also so they can conserve it over a long period. The rubber/springy thing would wear them out early. They still make some very tight circles but prefer not to tense up while doing it, which is the most efficient way, imo.
*I have still seen Chris Eubank Jr do the tense and springy thing (as a notable exception), though. Would not recommend copying him for boxing. Sometimes he's just tense almost like a robot.
tension is the enemy of generating power, the only time tension comes into play is the moment of impact to stabilise the fist and create alignment/brace against the recoil of the impact. most people can generate far more force than they can deliver to the target due to recoil.Well, we've noticed the prevalence of stiff "stop on a dime and leave it there" punching in TMAs like with TKD and karate. It "looks cool" and "feels cool" because it is an artificial substitute (fighting with movements emulating a robot) that incorrectly mimics what looks like control. When a person elects to exert themselves needlessly like this, they are using their own energy and commitment to decelerate their own momentum which they have worked to create in the first place. This kills the penetration and damage they would do if they had let it go.
All just to look cool and feel like something is being accomplished. It looks cool to spectators, who have no idea which way is up. It definitely draws new students for this reason: it's the exact opposite of subtle. People who don't know much assume a lot and have absurd egos to cater to. These demonstrations give them what they want.
---
Springiness is one way to keep the momentum alive while redirecting it instead of expending extra effort to stop it dead. Putting little circles on the end of somewhat straight lines of force to keep it going (either for penetration on contact [like a whip] or redirection it for further use) rather than cancelling it (why cancel it? It's like turning your car OFF every time you drive a foot) by counteracting it using opposite effort/contraction.
Boxers tend to make more use of some looser yet still compact circles (follow through), which allows them to continue their momentum/energy without needing to tense up and also so they can conserve it over a long period. The rubber/springy thing would wear them out early. They still make some very tight circles but prefer not to tense up while doing it, which is the most efficient way, imo.
*I have still seen Chris Eubank Jr do the tense and springy thing (as a notable exception), though. Would not recommend copying him for boxing. Sometimes he's just tense almost like a robot.
tension is the enemy of generating power, the only time tension comes into play is the moment of impact to stabilise the fist and create alignment/brace against the recoil of the impact. most people can generate far more force than they can deliver to the target due to recoil.
this is all bullshit i throw hard trying to knock my mad out fighting fuck all this other bs shit will get u seriously hurt@Reyesnuthugr
Notice in particular when the back foot hits on the second fist. The back foot lands right as the fist makes contact with the opponent. This seem weird at first but when you get this all of the power generated from the forwards step is thrust upwards in a spiral that explodes out of the arm into the hand. Even the stomp of the back foot sends a shock wave through the body into the fist. The shoulders are rounded forward until the arm is extending and then they expand as you make contact.
Just a rough overview but it is an interesting way of incorporating frame and various muscle groups all into one punch which adds a lot of power when it is all timed right.
youd get ur ass beat with that bullshit u nerdtension is the enemy of generating power, the only time tension comes into play is the moment of impact to stabilise the fist and create alignment/brace against the recoil of the impact. most people can generate far more force than they can deliver to the target due to recoil.
this is all bullshit i throw hard trying to knock my mad out fighting fuck all this other bs shit will get u seriously hurt
Now put me and the same opponent on the street, and there's a good chance I'll get pummeled
This is not entirely true. I was trying to explain that to a guy in the strength and conditioning sub forum.Tell you what, put me in a ring against someone taller and bigger than me with zero training and shit cardio, and I will beat them.
Now put me and the same opponent on the street, and there's a good chance I'll get pummeled