• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social Oh look another Nazi MAGA text thread has been released

Republicans: We are NOT Nazis.

Also Republicans: We are Nazis.

Why didn't anybody else in any of these recently revealed "Nazi" text threads contradict these Nazi losers?

Why was everyone just cool being in a political text thread with self avowed Nazi's about issues of the day and nobody thought to challenge them. It's almost like they AGREED.
 
Republicans: We are NOT Nazis.

Also Republicans: We are Nazis.

Why didn't anybody else in any of these recently revealed "Nazi" text threads contradict these Nazi losers?

Why was everyone just cool being in a political text thread with self avowed Nazi's about issues of the day and nobody thought to challenge them. It's almost like they AGREED.

They'll say something stupid like "I don't agree with what was said but I'll fight for the right to say it".

Of course, they never say that when someone says there are 6 genders. Wonder why?
 
I'm going to try to discuss this in good faith. Lets say there are some things 'associated' with Nazis you think are good. If you'd care to name a couple, my guess is that they may not be nazi-exclusive. Because unless I have missed something you have already disavowed at least a couple of things that made the Nazis Nazis.
Of course, the good Nazi things are found in many other ideologies:
- nationalism
- universal healthcare and education
- a society based on collective well being
- a society where individuals are at the service of collectivity
- discipline
- a very strong sense of national pride and the notion of a national project
- a society based on putting the national interest above anything else inter alia above capitalist interests


I could go on but you get the idea. None of this is unique to national socialism, but there are not many ideologies out there that combine nationalism with a social democratic economic model and I find that very charming.

Of course, the hole concentration camp, military invasion, genocide and other atrocities make National Socialism a model which is garbage as a whole, but it fine in my book to note that it also had positive aspects.
 
Yikes, I’d keep this to yourself.
Of course lol, if I posted this on LinkedIn my career would be ruined. Just like it would be seriously jeopardised if I called Israel a genocidal rogue-state, which I also believe. Some beliefs are better kept for oneself.
 
How many Republicans in power do you think would agree it would be a net benefit for America to remain majority White and that Quanza should be treated as a minor non-public holiday? Probably most of them, even if they don't make it the centre of their policies. I'd much rather withhold power from the race communists who actively make policies to promote diversity, their code word for disenfrachising Whites.
Minorities are here to stay. They aren't going anywhere. There's extremists on both sides and that's what you're coming off as. People need to be fucking nicer to each other instead of spreading hatred. Were all in this situation together whether the Rep or Dem extremists like it or not. Your neighbors success is your success. The problem is with divisive propaganda to keep people apart and from coming together in unity.

You're falling into a trap hostile forces want. It's fine there's millions who are fooled. Were stronger as one unit in cohesion.
 
Last edited:
Never heard of "race communism" and I'd bet real money Marx never uttered those words together. I bet no one has other than some very online conservatives
Yeah I'm not saying Marx said that, just curious if you reject the association with the advocates of race based redistribution or see them as cut from the same cloth.
 
Minorities are here to stay. They aren't going anywhere. There's extremists on both sides and that's what you're coming off as. People need to be fucking nicer to each other instead of spreading hatred. Were all in this situation together whether the Rep or Dem extremists like it or not. Your neighbors success is your success. The problem is with divisive propaganda to keep people apart and from coming together in unity.

You're falling into a trap hostile forces want. It's fine there's millions who are fooled. Were stronger as one unit in cohesion.
The question at hand is whether you are going to curate demographics or just continue to disregard the matter and hope for the best. Most right wing people would consider the latter to the the extreme option.
 
Thats how what you put read homie
I gotta work on my comm skills. The tldr version of what I'm saying is that if the invisible hand is free to make sweeping changes to demographics we could end up in a Lebanon/Yugoslavia situation.
 
I gotta work on my comm skills. The tldr version of what I'm saying is that if the invisible hand is free to make sweeping changes to demographics we could end up in a Lebanon/Yugoslavia situation.
I think attempting to make sweeping artificial changes to a demographic is morally and ethically indefensible. Demos will naturally change over time. Thats just how it is. Its just how it should be. No power that be should be free to make those kinds of changes
 
I think attempting to make sweeping artificial changes to a demographic is morally and ethically indefensible. Demos will naturally change over time. Thats just how it is. Its just how it should be. No power that be should be free to make those kinds of changes
If by natural change you mean things like difference in birth rates, I agree. However there is nothing natural about migrants flooding an area and disenfranchising the locals. Even if I thought it was natural, I could never tell a Lebanese person what happened to them was natural and something not worth avoiding.
 
If by natural change you mean things like difference in birth rates, I agree. However there is nothing natural about migrants flooding an area and disenfranchising the locals.
Legal migration leads to natural shifts in demographics and there is absolutely no problem with that.

Artificial demographic manipulation would be excluding or limiting migration arbitrarily based on race, ethnicity, nationality or beliefs. Conversely, it could also be solely allowing migrants from of a demographics you agree with or in a more extreme case giving incentives to said demo with the intention of drastically shifting the demo.

Migration requires legal limitations. Thats fine as long as those legal limitations do not exclude of favor specific groups.
 
If by natural change you mean things like difference in birth rates, I agree. However there is nothing natural about migrants flooding an area and disenfranchising the locals. Even if I thought it was natural, I could never tell a Lebanese person what happened to them was natural and something not worth avoiding.
What is your AV?
 


There's absolutely nothing righteous about this.

None of them are fat and most are attractive. What’s the issue? People like you whine about immigrants not being able to adapt but I swear the hardcore conservatives have an even harder time adapting to modern society. People move around. It’s not a big deal.
 
Well would you look at that someone is bowing out, go ahead and update the OP, I bet you won't

Yet the VA democrat that wants to shoot kids and the Nazi Maine Democrat both still pushing forward with support......

That is a new low for the dems.

 
Legal migration leads to natural shifts in demographics and there is absolutely no problem with that.

Artificial demographic manipulation would be excluding or limiting migration arbitrarily based on race, ethnicity, nationality or beliefs. Conversely, it could also be solely allowing migrants from of a demographics you agree with or in a more extreme case giving incentives to said demo with the intention of drastically shifting the demo.

Migration requires legal limitations. Thats fine as long as those legal limitations do not exclude of favor specific groups.
Immigration being sanctioned by the regime of the day doesn't stop it from being massively destructive. The Palestinian refugees who destroyed Lebanon were mostly legal. If an immigration model leads to societal destabilization and upheaval it is immoral in my opinion, especially when the motive is suppressing wages. This is why limitations should either favor specific groups or simply never let numbers get high enough to cause destabilization.
 
Back
Top