Hmm. That's a bit like comparing an onion and a banana.
They may go in the same political dish at times, or when the right issue is cooked bring up a mildly similar flavor, but their (RIP Homer) opinions and approach are fundamentally different.
As is their story and knowledge base - Trotsky is coming from an academic and deeply educated perspective, Fawlty from an educated but more realism (as a political measurement, the ideal vs the reality, not one is real and other fiction. The ideal leads the reality, the reality grounds the ideal.) based approach, and he shifted from kind of libertarian soft right to more freedom oriented and valuing left (at least last time I saw,) Trotsky is interested in a more future oriented approach (as his ideas and approach are more solidified) for improving on vast ideas as well, while Fawlty is kind of drawn to being interested in understanding more as he sails on the ship of discovery before reaching the port of political call.
That's my take anyway.
Poster ideology and evolution on an individual level is kind of fascinating.
When Fawlty and I started off several years ago, our political poles seemed (from my perspective) fairly similar (with different feelings) towards a few social issues, but both were interested in as much absolute freedom tempered with social need, tolerance, and kindness of the state as possible.
After that life experience and choices saw us radically diverge.