• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

NY Post has obtained some Hunter Biden emails v3 "slightly less salacious"

good morning Holmie!

I didn’t say that President Trump cares about human rights violations, whether they happen in China or anywhere else. You seem to think that it’s a relevant topic, though, when it comes to discussions on which country presents the most dire external threat to the United States.

My point was that although you believe that China is the greatest enemy to the United States, President Donald Trump probably would disagree.

“China seems to be making tremendous progress. Their numbers are way down. … I think our relationship with China is very good. We just did a big trade deal. We’re starting on another trade deal with China — a very big one. And we’ve been working very closely. They’ve been talking to our people, we’ve been talking to their people, having to do with the virus.”
- President Donald Trump, February 29, 2020

- IGIT
Okay I guess Trump and I disagree.
 
I guess these guys think anytime you want to bury a story, just push out a fake dossier and say: "Look its all fake!"

I wouldn't be surprised if the dossier came from the democratic party.
Yeah that folder looks like complete and total garbage. MSM really has no shame
 
Yeah that folder looks like complete and total garbage. MSM really has no shame

Don't know why it's even being discussed, to be honest. It's not related to this story.

I don't recall anybody posting about it when it came out, so it was obviously only a "thing" within niche circles. Like QAnon or whatever. I'm sure there's a lot of crap like this in CT nutjob circles.

The Hunter Biden laptop story is a separate one, and even the NBC article acknowledges that the allegations remain "unverified" (although some have been verified already).
 
Trump's net worth has decreased from $3.7 billion to $2.5 billion since he took office.

If he's using his position as a President to make a profit, then he's doing a pretty terrible job at it.
You don't really believe he's worth 2.5 billion dollars do you?
 
You don't really believe he's worth 2.5 billion dollars do you?

No. But according to all measurements, he's worth even less than he used to be. By a drastic amount.

None of this is proof that he isn't being corrupt, but if he is, then he's really, really shitty at being corrupt.

Generally you expect corrupt people to make a profit. Obviously Trump is an exception to many rules.
 
Sure thing... You guys managed to find a conspiracy theory more ridiculous than Hillary's emails... Its literally fake news, which is why Tucker Carlson is trying to distance himself from it

I just checked fox news mobile site and the first Hunter mention is TWENTY FIVE stories down the page. A story on judge Judy is higher up than it.

<Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>

And their top headline? "Dems poised to expand house majority. AOC is gonna take over".

Oh fox and their Ocasio-Cortez Derangement Syndrome.

<Dany07>
 
Last edited:
You don't really believe he's worth 2.5 billion dollars do you?

The man owns literal skyscrapers in Manhattan.

You think they just hand that shit out at Halloween? The midtown tower alone cost $300 million to build and that was in 1979.
 
That's an opinion link. People have opinions.

"Stuart E. Eizenstat was US Ambassador to the European Union, Under Secretary of Commerce, Under Secretary of State, and Deputy Secretary of the Treasury in the Clinton administration."
I've heard this argument before. CNN is loaded with "opinion pieces" threaded in between whatever they consider to be news worthy.

It makes almost no difference to any would be reader that visits their page. They are just conditioning people at this point.
 
Yeah, its clearly a CNN link.
<Cage33>
Opinion journalism does not follow the same parameters as news journalism. Implying CNN is balking on journalistic integrity because there is a specific opinion article is just not understanding your topic.
 
I've heard this argument before. CNN is loaded with "opinion pieces" threaded in between whatever they consider to be news worthy.

It makes almost no difference to any would be reader that visits their page. They are just conditioning people at this point.

No they're not, and people failing to read the word "opinion" and parse what that means in context to journalism is not the fault of the publication. It's like when people don't understand they're reading an onion article. That's not the fault of the onion when it's clearly a satire site.

Seeing "opinion" tells you immediately this is not "news" but a person's opinion.
 
The man owns literal skyscrapers in Manhattan.

You think they just hand that shit out at Halloween? The midtown tower alone cost $300 million to build and that was in 1979.
Billionaires don't have $400m loans backed by personal assets.
 
No they're not, and people failing to read the word "opinion" and parse what that means in context to journalism is not the fault of the publication. It's like when people don't understand they're reading an onion article. That's not the fault of the onion when it's clearly a satire site.

Seeing "opinion" tells you immediately this is not "news" but a person's opinion.
Im glad you brought up onion articles. Its the same concept.

CNN accepts and runs an opinion piece with the same intent of their narrative driven "news" stories. And they often get the same effect from the reader. Just becuase they stamp opinion on it doesnt change the fact they are trying to draw in the PA jewish vote by bring up the holocaust in relation to current race politics and trump.
 
Opinion journalism does not follow the same parameters as news journalism. Implying CNN is balking on journalistic integrity because there is a specific opinion article is just not understanding your topic.
Implying CNN has journalist integrity is just not understanding your topic.
 
Ok well the buildings are still there so I don't know what you want.
I'm just saying he's not a billionaire. The loan giver wouldn't require his personal assts be backing the loan otherwise.
 
Back
Top