• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

NPR = Infomercial for the left and Obama

Skip Reming

Banned
Banned
Joined
Nov 27, 2014
Messages
3,828
Reaction score
0
I know some people who take NPR seriously, like they are real and unbiased news. Facts are that they are bought by Obama's propaganda boys, in particular the deal to arm Iran with Nukes that Obama seems dead set on making happen.

The QUICK PROOF:
Ploughshares spokeswoman Jennifer Abrahamson protested to AP, "It is common practice for foundations to fund media coverage of underreported stories,” adding that funding "does not influence the editorial content of their coverage in any way, nor would we want it to." NPR admitted that Ploughshares has funded NPR's coverage of national security since 2005; every grant descriptions since 2010 mentions Iran.

Conclusion:
NPR is used as part of the echo chamber/propaganda machine of the Obama administration used to build a network of lies in "news" to lie to the public and push their bullshit through congress/etc. NPR is at least partially funded by anti israel groups as well. Oh, wait, I guess obama counts as anti-israel too.

MY BET:
Middle east oil money is going into propaganda against Israel to turn the world against them and arms muslim nations surrounding Israel with nuclear weapons. But that is just me.

Obama worst fucking president ever. Only a fucking shill can say that Obama is not a failure.

The WHOLE STORY

In a disturbing revelation of how much the Obama Administration’s plans to sell the Iran nuclear deal involved the corruption of the media, AP reports that The Ploughshares Fund, a group identified by Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes as one of the groups that helped build an “echo chamber” to promulgate the administration’s narrative, gave National Public Radio $100,000 last year to report on the deal and ancillary issues.

The Ploughshares Fund's mission is to ostensibly "build a safe, secure world by developing and investing in initiatives to reduce and ultimately eliminate the world's nuclear stockpiles," but as Rhodes revealed in an article in The New York Times Magazine, the fund was one of a group of nongovernmental organizations that worked to engender support for the deal. Rhodes said brazenly, "We created an echo chamber.”

The GOP had slammed the deal as being a product of White House spin.

Ploughshares’ 2015 annual report stated that the grant to NPR supported "national security reporting that emphasizes the themes of U.S. nuclear weapons policy and budgets, Iran's nuclear program, international nuclear security topics and U.S. policy toward nuclear security.” Board chairwoman Mary Lloyd Estrin bragged in the report that the success of the Iran deal was "driven by the fearless leadership of the Obama administration and supporters in Congress, less known is the absolutely critical role that civil society played in tipping the scales towards this extraordinary policy victory."

Ploughshares spokeswoman Jennifer Abrahamson protested to AP, "It is common practice for foundations to fund media coverage of underreported stories,” adding that funding "does not influence the editorial content of their coverage in any way, nor would we want it to." NPR admitted that Ploughshares has funded NPR's coverage of national security since 2005; every grant descriptions since 2010 mentions Iran.

NPR stated, "It's a valued partnership, without any conditions from Ploughshares on our specific reporting, beyond the broad issues of national and nuclear security, nuclear policy, and nonproliferation. As with all support received, we have a rigorous editorial firewall process in place to ensure our coverage is independent and is not influenced by funders or special interests."

Rep. Mike Pompeo of Kansas called Ploughshares' links to the media "tremendously troubling," adding that he consistently had attempted to be interviewed in 2015 to balance the perspective offered by Rep. Adam Schiff of California, who was selling the deal on the network repeatedly. NPR denied the accusation, saying it had no record of Pompeo’s requests.

But Joseph Cirincione, Ploughshares' president spoke on NPR at least twice in 2015 to sell the deal; only once was his identity as an NPR funder mentioned.

Ploughshares gave the anti-Israel group J Street $576, 500 last year to push the Iran deal; the National Iranian American Council received over $281,000. Princeton University got $70,000 to sustain former Iranian ambassador and nuclear spokesman Seyed Hossein Mousavian's "analysis, publications and policymaker engagement on the range of elements involved with the negotiated settlement of Iran's nuclear program."

Ploughshares isn’t about to stop; its "Cultural Strategy Report" on its website states the group will attempt to ensure “regular and accurate coverage of nuclear issues in reputable and strategic media outlets" including The Guardian, Salon, the Huffington Post or Pro Publica. Because its prior efforts fell short of its expectations, including "funding of reporters at The Nation and Mother Jones and a partnership with The Center for Public Integrity to create a national security desk,” Ploughshares wants to create "web videos, podcasts, photo-based stories" and other "attention-grabbing formats" for "creatively reframing the issue."

http://www.dailywire.com/news/5920/rhodes-echo-chamber-group-paid-npr-cover-iran-deal-hank-berrien
 
Skip Reming dropping truth nukes on Sherdog once again. Boom!
 
news-sources-fdu.jpg


NPR2.jpg


NPR is not perfect. i challenge you to show me numbers better than these for any other source, though. you cant and wont do it. you wont try it.

the specific questions asked for "knowledgeable viewers" in the first graph are readily available, and fair by anyone's measure.
 
NPR is not perfect. i challenge you to show me numbers better than these for any other source, though. you cant and wont do it. you wont try it.

.

Oh, I think you misunderstand. I could give a shit about what you are arguing. Go make a thread on it and maybe someone would care.
This thread is about NPR pushing fake stories because they are paid off by Obama's propaganda machine to lie to congress and the public to get shit passed like giving nukes to Iran.

Many people think NPR is on the up and up and unbiased. Of course they are left leaning for sure, but proof of them ACTUALLY BEING BOUGHT OFF TO PROPAGATE LIES BY OBAMA'S CAMP is probably surprising to a lot of people.

It is called an exposé, learn about it some time.

I don't give a fuck about your "well so and so does this or is just as bad so don't give a shit because this is my side doing it". you can cram that weak ass shit on some liberal satchel riders, ain't gonna work on me.
 
Oh, I think you misunderstand. I could give a shit about what you are arguing. Go make a thread on it and maybe someone would care.
This thread is about NPR pushing fake stories because they are paid off by Obama's propaganda machine to lie to congress and the public to get shit passed like giving nukes to Iran.

Many people think NPR is on the up and up and unbiased. Of course they are left leaning for sure, but proof of them ACTUALLY BEING BOUGHT OFF TO PROPAGATE LIES BY OBAMA'S CAMP is probably surprising to a lot of people.

It is called an exposé, learn about it some time.

I don't give a fuck about your "well so and so does this or is just as bad so don't give a shit because this is my side doing it". you can cram that weak ass shit on some liberal satchel riders, ain't gonna work on me.


so whats in it for obama to "give iran nukes," and to try to sell it to everyone by buying off npr?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone that doesn't know/believe that NPR leans heavy left is delusional or just flat lying to themselves.

They have some good programs but the news and much of the other programing are as stated above.
 
Last edited:
The lefties have NPR

The righties have Rush, Mark Levine, savage, Hannity, beck


You choose which side is worse.
 
Look another thread with Skip Whining. Sack up homeboy, the world aint that bad.
I find it funny in 2016 we are still complaining about media bias.
All of the news sources are biased. They get paid(advertisements) by the same corporations that make it rain in DC. They make sure we are good and distracted by Kayne, some Kardashians ass and click bait threads that give both sides a chance to whine about the same article.
Can we change the name of this forum to the Whine Room.
 
If what you claimed were accurate it would indeed be damning .

This was from your post , can you show this to be incorrect?

Ploughshares spokeswoman Jennifer Abrahamson protested to AP, "It is common practice for foundations to fund media coverage of underreported stories,” adding that funding "does not influence the editorial content of their coverage in any way, nor would we want it to." NPR admitted that Ploughshares has funded NPR's coverage of national security since 2005; every grantdescriptions since 2010 mentions Iran.


This is also ftom your post



"Ploughshares gave the anti-Israel group J Street $576, 500 last year to push the Iran deal; the National Iranian American Council received over $281,000. Princeton University got $70,000 to sustain former Iranian ambassador and nuclear spokesman Seyed Hossein Mousavian's "analysis, publications and policymaker engagement on the range of elements involved with the negotiated settlement of Iran's nuclear program."


Your post calls Jstreet an anti Israel group , that appears to be false

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Street

J Street is a nonprofit liberal[4][5][6] advocacy group based in the United States whose stated aim is to promote American leadership to end theArab–Israeli and Israel–Palestinian conflicts peacefully and diplomatically. J Street was incorporated on November 29, 2007
 
I think this guy is trying to out crap-post Rex Kwon Do or something
 
If what you claimed were accurate it would indeed be damning .

This was from your post , can you show this to be incorrect?

Ploughshares spokeswoman Jennifer Abrahamson protested to AP, "It is common practice for foundations to fund media coverage of underreported stories,” adding that funding "does not influence the editorial content of their coverage in any way, nor would we want it to." NPR admitted that Ploughshares has funded NPR's coverage of national security since 2005; every grantdescriptions since 2010 mentions Iran.

Why would I show this to be incorrect??? How about you prove it so be incorrect? This is a quote from the ploughshares woman herself ffs? See, this article is MY EVIDENCE. Post yours to the contrary.

PS J Street is anti israel
:J Street was founded “to promote meaningful American leadership to end the Arab-Israeli and Palestinian-Israel conflicts peacefully and diplomatically.” Key to this, says J Street, will be the pursuit of “a new direction for American policy in the Middle East,” a direction that recognizes “the right of the Palestinians to a sovereign state of their own”—where Palestine and Israel live “side-by-side in peace and security.” “In the 21st century,” J Street affirms, “we have reached a moment in history where supporting a Palestinian state is the only way to ensure Israel’s survival as a democracy and a national home for the Jewish people.” Toward this end, J Street supports “diplomatic solutions over military ones” and “dialogue over confrontation.” Israel’s partner in such a dialogue would necessarily be Hamas, which holds the reins of political power in Gaza and denies Israel’s right to exist.:

Hamas are terrorist bent on destroying Israel.

/served


so whats in it for obama to "give iran nukes," and to try to sell it to everyone by buying off npr?

I don't know but as per a previous thread I made he has lied about the Iran deal from the get go. This was already stated in a NYT article from Obama's fucking guy HIMSELF!!!
As for his reasons, I also put down why I thought might be possibles, but it does not change anything about my post. Sorry.

The lefties have NPR

The righties have Rush, Mark Levine, savage, Hannity, beck


You choose which side is worse.

LOL, you give talk show names, how about some fucking networks. CNN, hollywood, MSNBC and most main stream media. The left has much more of the media than the right does, wake the fuck up and be a little less ignorant. The only station the right has is foxnews and it is the only one worth a shit.

Look another thread with Skip Whining. Sack up homeboy, the world aint that bad.
I find it funny in 2016 we are still complaining about media bias.

Hey, look you whining about my post and have nothing to say to contradict it. Again you might want to read the post before bitching. I say we all know about media bias, this is NPR getting PAID to push a false story PERIOD. Just a little bit different.

Like, do you even know what the war room is for? I don't think it is just here for you to ride my nuts and bitch. Prove me wrong or leave.

I think this guy is trying to out crap-post Rex Kwon Do or something

So, what is your evidence my post is wrong? none

I think you are trying to out crap kong which is saying a lot.
 
Why would I show this to be incorrect??? How about you prove it so be incorrect? This is a quote from the ploughshares woman herself ffs? See, this article is MY EVIDENCE. Post yours to the contrary.

PS J Street is anti israel
:J Street was founded “to promote meaningful American leadership to end the Arab-Israeli and Palestinian-Israel conflicts peacefully and diplomatically.” Key to this, says J Street, will be the pursuit of “a new direction for American policy in the Middle East,” a direction that recognizes “the right of the Palestinians to a sovereign state of their own”—where Palestine and Israel live “side-by-side in peace and security.” “In the 21st century,” J Street affirms, “we have reached a moment in history where supporting a Palestinian state is the only way to ensure Israel’s survival as a democracy and a national home for the Jewish people.” Toward this end, J Street supports “diplomatic solutions over military ones” and “dialogue over confrontation.” Israel’s partner in such a dialogue would necessarily be Hamas, which holds the reins of political power in Gaza and denies Israel’s right to exist.:

Hamas are terrorist bent on destroying Israel.

/served




I don't know but as per a previous thread I made he has lied about the Iran deal from the get go. This was already stated in a NYT article from Obama's fucking guy HIMSELF!!!
As for his reasons, I also put down why I thought might be possibles, but it does not change anything about my post. Sorry.



LOL, you give talk show names, how about some fucking networks. CNN, hollywood, MSNBC and most main stream media. The left has much more of the media than the right does, wake the fuck up and be a little less ignorant. The only station the right has is foxnews and it is the only one worth a shit.



Hey, look you whining about my post and have nothing to say to contradict it. Again you might want to read the post before bitching. I say we all know about media bias, this is NPR getting PAID to push a false story PERIOD. Just a little bit different.

Like, do you even know what the war room is for? I don't think it is just here for you to ride my nuts and bitch. Prove me wrong or leave.



So, what is your evidence my post is wrong? none

I think you are trying to out crap kong which is saying a lot.
So in your view anyone who supports a Palestinian state is anti Israel?

And its on you to contradict the statement from Ploughshares because it undermines the entire premise of your thread and its from your own op
 
I don't know about the specific claims in the post, but NPR has been getting more and more hackish, 5-6 years ago I would say they were impressively centered, relative to most other media outlets.
 
Since NPR is radio...

Rush and Hannity have the number one and number three radio shows while NPR news shows are numbers two and four. None of these should be compared to television.
 
Here we are again, the right no liking that reality does not support their views so everything must have a liberal slant. NPR, Wikipedia, ect...

Oh, silly righties!
 
I listen to NPR every workday. It definitely has a liberal slant, you just gotta take that into consideration.
 
so the obama admin claims with regard to the iran deal:

sanctions on iran were running out
the countries who were sanctioning them along with us were not willing to continue doing this
unilateral USA only sanctions would not have much of an effect or be much of a deterent
this deal allows us inspectors on the ground....even assuming they can be lied to....lied to inspectors are better than 0 inspectors
the entire deal can be scrapped at any time

what about any of that is a lie or unreasonable?
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,259,500
Messages
56,969,311
Members
175,485
Latest member
Dark Lord
Back
Top