Not Showtime yet: Report emBARRgoed (SCO Thread v. 30)

[andnowweknow]

Seen this fuckin guy. Thought it was Eddie Murphy trying to troll people in his Clump outfit.

 

[bobgeese]

If anyone needs to be investigated it's those fat fucks running propaganda channels on CNN and MSNBC. Raid their offices, check their taxes, revenues, calls, interrogate them. The amount of convictions that would come from that would make 1980s mob look like amateur hour.

If anyone needs to be investigated, it’s Perkins Cole law firm.


Behind 84% of shady shit on the left, you’ll find PC.

 

[vengeful]

Further investigations aren't going to yield wildly different results from the Mueller investigation.

I've told you this once before in regard to the Senate and Mueller investigations.

I was absolutely right then, and I'm absolutely right now.

Beyond that, you're free to cling to whatever it is you call hope.

Yeah, gotta agree with you on that in regards to the Russian-Trump Campaign collusion. I've stated before that Congress aren't anywhere near as good at investigations as Mueller and the FBI and they should just accept the results and move on. The most they should do is maybe invite Mueller in for questioning so he can answer some questions about the investigations, but that's it. Accept his findings and move on because he's better at it than they are, and he's not as biased as they are.

But with that said, I think the SDNY is the real problem with Trump and I have always thought that since they started investigating him....the reason is, they don't have any scope limitations on what they can investigate, and I don't think there's any one that's a billionaire based on real-estate in NYC that didn't commit some type of federal financial crime in their ascent to becoming a billionaire. I don't think even die-hard Trump supporters believe he never committed a federal crime, whether that be tax evasion, bank fraud, bribery, extortion etc.

 

[glenwo2]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/to...-on-mueller-probe-as-nadler-warns-of-cover-up

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., speaking to "Fox News Sunday," vowed that congressional investigators will press on and continue to investigate President Trump while warning of a possibly unfolding Justice Department "cover-up," even as he acknowledged that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has apparently closed his investigation without indicting a single American for illegally colluding with Russia.

Nadler also asserted that it's "way too early to talk about impeachment," as Washington awaits Attorney General William Barr's highly expected release of Mueller's primary conclusions, which Trump's personal lawyers tell Fox News is expected Sunday afternoon.

A foundational reason for the launch of the high-profile Mueller probe nearly two years ago was to investigate and prosecute any improper collusion by members of the Trump campaign with Russia, but a senior Justice Department official confirmed on Friday that no new indictments would be coming out of Mueller's office.

"All we know is that the special counsel -- what we think we know -- is that the special counsel is not bringing criminal indictments for collusion," Nadler told host Chris Wallace. "There are other investigations going on which he’s farmed out, the Southern District of New York, Eastern District of Virginia, and they may or may not. We do know, remember, in plain sight, of a lot of collusion.


"We know for example that the president’s son and his campaign manager were present in the meeting with the Russians, to receive information which they were told in the invitation was part of the Russian government's attempt to help them in the election," Nadler said. "We know that the campaign manager gave political targeting data to an agent of the Russian government. So we know a lot of things and maybe it’s not indictable, but we know there was collusion. The question is the degree.

Nadler added: "The job of Congress is much broader than the job of the special counsel. The special counsel is looking and can only look for crimes. We have to protect the rule of law, we have to look for abuses of power, we have to look for obstructions of justice, we have to look for corruption in the exercise of power which may not be crimes."

Lol I really need to save that Cormier gif damnit

Did it for you..... See above FIXED POST.

 

[bobgeese]

Yeah, gotta agree with you on that in regards to the Russian-Trump Campaign collusion. I've stated before that Congress aren't anywhere near as good at investigations as Mueller and the FBI and they should just accept the results and move on. The most they should do is maybe invite Mueller in for questioning so he can answer some questions about the investigations, but that's it. Accept his findings and move on because he's better at it than they are, and he's not as biased as they are.

But with that said, I think the SDNY is the real problem with Trump and I have always thought that since they started investigating him....the reason is, they don't have any scope limitations on what they can investigate, and I don't think there's any one that's a billionaire based on real-estate in NYC that didn't commit some type of federal financial crime in their ascent to becoming a billionaire. I don't think even die-hard Trump supporters believe he never committed a federal crime, whether that be tax evasion, bank fraud, bribery, extortion etc.

True, VERY few billionaires didn’t step over a few bodies to get to the top.

Here’s what you don’t get.


This is politics, once trump leaves office, the only people that give a shit about sdny getting trump, are the folks that bought a trump Christmas ornament.

So not many. You either remove him from office, or you don’t.

Win or lose, that’s all that matters.

 

[glenwo2]

And yet it is FACT.

That you are UNHINGED?

Yeah.

Thanks for agreeing with me.

The first step is to admit you have a problem.

 

[glenwo2]

When was he not? Serious question.
I'd love to hear @58miles input on the news too.

58miles post would consist of this :

"I am an asshole. Now watch me post asshole-ish things 'cause that's what I do."

 

[glenwo2]

Um....are they ok over there at CNN??

I think they're grieving.

 

[bobgeese]

58miles post would consist of this :

"I am an asshole. Now watch me post asshole-ish things 'cause that's what I do."

Also, racist.

 

[glenwo2]

Yes, it's called no new indictments. You can pretend to be obtuse, but if Mueller had real case against Trump that would mean Manafort or Stone had to catch at least 1 conspiracy charge. There was no conspiracy. Case closed, Detective Clouseau.

And let's not forget NO SEALED INDICTMENTS either (in case the leftists here want to bring that up).

 

[vengeful]

True, VERY few billionaires didn’t step over a few bodies to get to the top.

Here’s what you don’t get.


This is politics, once trump leaves office, the only people that give a shit about sdny getting trump, are the folks that bought a trump Christmas ornament.

So not many. You either remove him from office, or you don’t.

Win or lose, that’s all that matters.

Dude, if Trump isn't in office and goes to prison a ton of people will care. You say that people only care if you're in office and get indicted, look how many people are still chanting "Lock her up" Trump and Hilary are both polarizing figures that are loved/hated (well, i guess someone loves Hilary, maybe not). If either goes to jail at any point it will be HUGE.

 

[grizzard2bid]

And let's not forget NO SEALED INDICTMENTS either (in case the leftists here want to bring that up).

Every leftists in this thread:

 

[glenwo2]

WHO THE FUCK IS THIS DON-KING LOOKALIKE??

 

[glenwo2]

Yeah, gotta agree with you on that in regards to the Russian-Trump Campaign collusion. I've stated before that Congress aren't anywhere near as good at investigations as Mueller and the FBI and they should just accept the results and move on. The most they should do is maybe invite Mueller in for questioning so he can answer some questions about the investigations, but that's it. Accept his findings and move on because he's better at it than they are, and he's not as biased as they are.

But with that said, I think the SDNY is the real problem with Trump and I have always thought that since they started investigating him....the reason is, they don't have any scope limitations on what they can investigate, and I don't think there's any one that's a billionaire based on real-estate in NYC that didn't commit some type of federal financial crime in their ascent to becoming a billionaire. I don't think even die-hard Trump supporters believe he never committed a federal crime, whether that be tax evasion, bank fraud, bribery, extortion etc.

You think he sees any Jail-time, though?

I don't.

I see Heavy Fines up his ass in the future but that's it.

Also, I don't see any of his family behind bars either.

They will all PROBABLY see the inside of a courtroom (even that isn't a certainty) but that's the closest any of them come to jail-time, imo.

 

[glenwo2]

Dude, if Trump isn't in office and goes to prison a ton of people will care. You say that people only care if you're in office and get indicted, look how many people are still chanting "Lock her up" Trump and Hilary are both polarizing figures that are loved/hated (well, i guess someone loves Hilary, maybe not). If either goes to jail at any point it will be HUGE.

That's a big IF, though. Especially with the Prison part.

 

[bobgeese]

Dude, if Trump isn't in office and goes to prison a ton of people will care. You say that people only care if you're in office and get indicted, look how many people are still chanting "Lock her up" Trump and Hilary are both polarizing figures that are loved/hated (well, i guess someone loves Hilary, maybe not). If either goes to jail at any point it will be HUGE.

Liberals might “care”, as in it eases their butthurt.

Republicans, meh..

 

[andnowweknow]

Dude, if Trump isn't in office and goes to prison a ton of people will care. You say that people only care if you're in office and get indicted, look how many people are still chanting "Lock her up" Trump and Hilary are both polarizing figures that are loved/hated (well, i guess someone loves Hilary, maybe not). If either goes to jail at any point it will be HUGE.

Very few people will care. His support stems from distaste for the left, not admiration for him. The whole Trump appeal is about stickin it to the libs, pretty much everyone agrees outside politics that he's a shitty unethical person in pretty much every way imaginable.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Blue-balls AND butt-hurt.

 

[grizzard2bid]

Very few people will care. His support stems from distaste for the left, not admiration for him. The whole Trump appeal is about stickin it to the libs, pretty much everyone agrees outside politics that he's a shitty unethical person in pretty much every way imaginable.

Or maybe it is sticking it to the establishment that bankrupted the country and getting tired of same old shitty foreign policy and trade deals. Obummer's "hope and change" was what broke the camel's back. He was a sellout POS can. Fuck him and everyone who still supports him.

 

[andnowweknow]

Or maybe it is sticking it to the establishment that bankrupted the country and getting tired of same old shitty foreign policy and trade deals. Obummer's "hope and change" was what broke the camel's back. He was a sellout POS can. Fuck him and everyone who still supports him.

99% of the vitriol is levied at the liberal end of the country. You including Republicans in that is ridiculous.

And Trump is the epitome of establishment elite.