Not Showtime yet: Report emBARRgoed (SCO Thread v. 30)

Status
Not open for further replies.
lol. I love that. you might as well say you give up.

You give an example of someone going out Elephant hunting and coming back with squirrels and claiming victory...

and say that is proven when Mueller is LITERALLY sent out hunting "individuals associated with the Trump Campaign" and he finds individuals associated with the Trump campaign and you try to spin that as a failure. lol

<{outtahere}>




Reminder, every time you post, you look more and more foolish. Nobody in the investigation was charged with anything related to Russia.


Literally nobody cares about your desperate attempts to make Meullers flop appear successful. It was a failure and armed Trump with the best weapon he could hope for in 2020.

Now,

Point and laugh at the liberal everyone,

<Dany07>
 
I'm old (for here) so I really don't know what Comic Con is, but it's just a joke/hyperbole. Take it easy, lady.
You also don't know how to spell won, apparently. So yeah, I'd say learning how to take a joke should be high on your list of things to get good at.
 
Reminder, every time you post, you look more and more foolish. Nobody in the investigation was charged with anything related to Russia.


Literally nobody cares about your desperate attempts to make Meullers flop appear successful. It was a failure and armed Trump with the best weapon he could hope for in 2020.

Now,

Point and laugh at the liberal everyone,

<Dany07>
Except you are factually wrong as most of the charges (16+ Trump associates) were over "links" or "coordination" with Russia.
 
<TrumpWrong1>



Give it up bro, you lost.
Haha.

I love losing by being right.

Mueller is LITERALLY sent out hunting "individuals associated with the Trump Campaign" and their "links" and "coordination" with Russia he finds individuals associated with the Trump campaign and all sorts of "links" and "coordination" with Russia and you try to spin that as a failure. lol

<{outtahere}>

You just cannot admit a loss.
 
Haha.

I love losing by being right.

Mueller is LITERALLY sent out hunting "individuals associated with the Trump Campaign" and their "links" and "coordination" with Russia he finds individuals associated with the Trump campaign and all sorts of "links" and "coordination" with Russia and you try to spin that as a failure. lol

<{outtahere}>

You just cannot admit a loss.




Sure sure, he found them...

I just can’t seem to find any charges for any crimes related to Russia...

<TheWire1>




But please, keep posting the same thing over and over. The embarrassment looks good on you.
 
Acceptance is the first step to recovery.



Leftists always project.
Happy to take this to the bet thread.

In case you actually think you are right here are the two elements of the bet

- was this the core element of Mueller's INvestigation "Mueller is LITERALLY sent out hunting "individuals associated with the Trump Campaign" and their "links" and "coordination" with Russia "

and

- did he achieve that?


You know how I know you won't take the bet?
 
Sure sure, he found them...

I just can’t seem to find any charges for any crimes related to Russia...

<TheWire1>




But please, keep posting the same thing over and over. The embarrassment looks good on you.
16+ indicted with 'links' or 'coordination' with Russia as per the core element of Mueller Mandate.

Nope nothing to see here. Mueller investigation was a big bust.

2wsl37.jpg
 
16+ indicted with 'links' or 'coordination' with Russia as per the core element of Mueller Mandate.

Nope nothing to see here. Mueller investigation was a big bust.

2wsl37.jpg



Are you talking about the Russian shitposters?


How much time are they gonna serve again?
 
Are you talking about the Russian shitposters?


How much time are they gonna serve again?

Oh, watch out everyone..,

Careful Bob's coming thru.

oWUuoMf.gif


There you go again.

Now you are admitting they were indicted for 'links' and 'coordination' with Russia and trying to say 'well how much time are they gonna serve', as your defense.

You should probably have lead with that one rather than trying to switch as that shows you know you were wrong.
 
Last edited:
Happy to take this to the bet thread.

In case you actually think you are right here are the two elements of the bet

- was this the core element of Mueller's INvestigation "Mueller is LITERALLY sent out hunting "individuals associated with the Trump Campaign" and their "links" and "coordination" with Russia "

and

- did he achieve that?


You know how I know you won't take the bet?

You're wanting to bet that Mullers metaphorical elephant hunt did in fact bag some squirrels.

It a bet that untimely proves my argument correct, regardless of how you try to fix any bet to your favor.

How about an accout bet:

Will President Trump be impeached during his first term?

You know how I know you won't take the bet?
 
Oh, watch out everyone..,

Careful Bob's coming thru.

oWUuoMf.gif


There you go again.

Now you are admitting they were indicted for 'links' and 'coordination' with Russia and trying to say 'wel how much time did they gonna serve', as your defense.

You should probably have lead with that one rather than trying to switch as that shows you know you were wrong.

That's not what @bobgeese said at all.

To the extent that you think he did, is the extent you're wrong.
 
You're wanting to bet that Mullers metaphorical elephant hunt did in fact bag some squirrels.

It a bet that untimely proves my argument correct, regardless of how you try to fix any bet to your favor.

How about an accout bet:

Will President Trump be impeached during his first term?

You know how I know you won't take the bet?
So if it proves you correct does that mean you'll take the bet?

And I won't rely on anything metaphorical. Just actual factual quotes.

(I know you won't)
 
Oh, watch out everyone..,

Careful Bob's coming thru.

oWUuoMf.gif


There you go again.

Now you are admitting they were indicted for 'links' and 'coordination' with Russia and trying to say 'wel how much time did they gonna serve', as your defense.

You should probably have lead with that one rather than trying to switch as that shows you know you were wrong.




They’re Russians, they have zero connection to the trump campaign.

The fact you even attempt to tie them into the argument is a high school debate level tactic. It doesn’t work there, it doesn’t work here.



Nobody on the trump campaign had any charges against them related to Russia. That’s all that matters.


Trump won, and he’ll use it effectively against you.

Now please, post the same thing again. Maybe this time we won’t all laugh at you.
 
Reminder, every time you post, you look more and more foolish. Nobody in the investigation was charged with anything related to Russia.


Literally nobody cares about your desperate attempts to make Meullers flop appear successful. It was a failure and armed Trump with the best weapon he could hope for in 2020.

Now,

Point and laugh at the liberal everyone,

<Dany07>


Lying About contact with Russians has nothing to do with Russia? Interesting way to see it
 
Lying About contact with Russians has nothing to do with Russia? Interesting way to see it


Talking to Russians isn’t a crime. Russia is a major world power, it’s completely normal for people to interact with them.

Btw, who exactly are you referencing? GP? You’ll be finding out more about that soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top