1. Guest, The MS Paint Shoop Thread v5 is up! Red Block» | Blue Block»

No points for body triangle back take - one od the dumbest rules?

Discussion in 'Grappling Technique' started by michi972, Aug 9, 2018.

  1. michi972 Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,697
    Likes Received:
    11
    Wy there are no points when you take back and you make triangle with legs, why you don't get points?You have better control, it is uncomfortable for your opponent.Is there any logical reason why it isn't scored?
     
  2. Dogstarman Old man jiu jitsu

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    11,579
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On the mats
    Get your hooks count to 3 then transfer to body triangle. The body triangle is a great control position but it also limits your movement as well.
     
  3. RyanR Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    6,760
    Likes Received:
    836
    Location:
    Parts unknown
    IBJJF has quite a few dumb rules from not getting with the times. This is one of them.
     
  4. JustTheTip Green Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,461
    Likes Received:
    1
    It is too easy to get. The struggle to get and achieve the hooks in makes it worth the 4 points. While the body triangle is harder for the opponent to escape, it is much easier to get than hooks.
     
  5. Gabicho Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,861
    Likes Received:
    29
    I guess it goes more along the lines that it cannot be scored by everyone due to physicall limitations, both of the attacker and the defender.
    Guys with short legs or fighting thick or obese opponents just cannot get a body triangle.
    Hooks are doable.
     
  6. Alech33 Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2018
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. If you are looking for points sink your hooks in and then lock in the body triangle. There's a lot of rules/scoring that I don't agree with. If you need to get points gotta play to their rules
     
  7. Alech33 Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2018
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    How do you figure it's too easy to get? Getting around to someone back is most of the battle. I can see hooks being slightly harder but they can give you trouble trying to lock the triangle too
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018
  8. berimBOWLoh Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    12,496
    Likes Received:
    3
    Body triangle limits all your attacks. It’s like getting mount and staying grapevines the whole time. Sure you keep the position but it’s also a stall out type spot. Defender only worries about RnC and not armbars, kinuras, triangles etc

    As far as the rules I think the point system will always be flawed
     
  9. EGDM Green Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,061
    Likes Received:
    51
    Points reflect the utility of a position, not its difficulty. The fact that many high-level grapplers put in hooks for points and then immediately give them up for a triangle tells you all you need to know.
     
  10. BJJ_Rage Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    19,930
    Likes Received:
    126
    As dumb as the reaping rule
     
  11. yetanother Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,526
    Likes Received:
    142
    One problem according to the people responsible by the rather lame FILA grappling rules they remove scoring for the back triangle because there wasn't a clear cut boundary when people where taking the back from the closed guard.
    OTOH they could score the back triangle only when combined with a seatbelt grip.
     
  12. cjd Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2013
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    0
    I find the body triangle offers superior control for consolidating the position, and can easily be switched into one leg across, one posting on the hip - perfect for arm traps or switching to collar chokes and armlocks. I find the hooks largely useless except as a waystation to getting to this kind of control.

    So like, yeah, the hooks rule is dumb. Agreed with the poster above that points are scored (or ought to be) based on the utility of the position/action rather than degree of difficulty. This isn't diving.
     
  13. Alech33 Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2018
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0

    I don't entirely agree with the first part but it's a good argument. I like the triangle while I work to cross the hands for a straight jacket attack so not exactly stalling. As for their always being flaws, absolutely! That said I think ibjjf has a lot of obvious flaws that they are unwilling to fix
     
  14. tekkenfan Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2017
    Messages:
    6,801
    Likes Received:
    219
    yeah tis pretty dumb i could see maybe 1 hook maybe but a body triangle? lmao its harder to get a body triangle than both hooks and is more control its silly
     
  15. yetanother Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,526
    Likes Received:
    142
    Most of the changes IBJJF have been doing where small tweaks to things that where extremely ridiculous. Nothing serious has been done to simplify rules, make them easier to ref or to discourage stalling. It's simply ridiculous that even outside of a pressure of a match going one and having an open pdf rule book there are plenty of calls that are hard to make.
     
  16. Dirty Holt Black Belt Professional Fighter

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    Olympic Training Center
    You know what? I never thought of that, but holy crap does it make sense.
     
  17. cjd Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2013
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think there are reasonable adjustments to the wording of this rule that encompass both the hooks, body triangle and other such permutations of how the legs are used to control using the rear mount; ie, being able to touch one foot to the other leg or something like that.
     
  18. dmwalking Sapateiro Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    11,388
    Likes Received:
    512
    Was Marcelo able to get both hooks against Ricco Rodriguez? I can't remember. I know he had his back.
     
  19. dmwalking Sapateiro Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    11,388
    Likes Received:
    512
    I vote that it's a stupid rule. Both hooks in represents full control. Body triangle with seatbelt grip is full control. Should count toward points.

    Also, crucifix should get points too. :)
     
  20. JustTheTip Green Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,461
    Likes Received:
    1
    It depends on your body composition. I have long legs and a short torso so its way easier for me to get the body triangle than both hooks.
    Points reflect difficulty too as well as utility of position.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.