No more Mattis soon.

franklinstower said:
I just had a friendly conversation with a guy who it turns out was not interested in conversation -- just one upmanship. I hope that is an existence worth it to you man.

My experience has been one of growing peace and goodwill towards you while discovering you are interested in neither.
Click to expand...

Friendly conversation?

I was actually responding to someone else and then you came in raging and then got even more enraged after I dared to mention Hillary. You then proceeded to blather on like a rock for 3 pages and couldn't even figure out what time period the conversation was about.
 
KeepItRealist said:
I distrust polls by nature, but I wonder why we never saw those figures when Obama was in office. No one was ever more despised by the military.
Click to expand...
The same reason the daily death tolls in Iraq / Afg. (and the anti war protests) being front pages news suddenly stopped.
 
lfd0311 said:
Remember how Liberals spent months Trashing Mattis for being an aggressive warhawk who had no business being Secretary of Defense?
Click to expand...
They've long jumped the shark when it comes to taking their opinions the least bit seriously in regards to anything Trump related.
 
KeepItRealist said:
I distrust polls by nature, but I wonder why we never saw those figures when Obama was in office. No one was ever more despised by the military.
Click to expand...
We did. It made national news a number of times. Google is your friend.
 
PEDS Help me Post said:
Well, I only brought up Hillary because you, for no reason whatsoever, brought up Trump. Why did you bring up Trump for no reason? I didn't say anything about Trump and then you responded to my post bringing him up. Why did you do that? Why can't you stay on topic?
Click to expand...


Hey man. I just went back just to make sure I did not miss something really obvious that makes me an asshole here without realizing it. Do you know what I found? More lies and derailment from you. You have not been honest at all man. Not at all.

Here is the beginning of our exchange-- the very beginning. You quoted it earlier but left one part out. Here it is in full.

Other poster---
It seems that a massive shift in power to Russia is something potus is fine with. Emphasis added.

Here is your reply to him talking about Trump.

It is basically inevitable at this point anyway.

"The U.S. foreign policy of trying to bully and overthrow everybody is backfiring while Putin is going behind the scenes and using diplomacy to create allies.... and the foreign policy of the U.S. is making it even easier for him to do so."


Man you have asked me why I brought up Trump quite a few times and you have said you never brought him up and I did because I am a deranged Trump hater. I took your word for that. Imagine my surprise to go back and find that the initial exchange and reply of yours that I first responded to referenced Trump not to mention the thread is about the Trump admin.....
PEDS Help me Post said:
Friendly conversation?

I was actually responding to someone else and then you came in raging and then got even more enraged after I dared to mention Hillary. You then proceeded to blather on like a rock for 3 pages and couldn't even figure out what time period the conversation was about.
Click to expand...
.


That initial reply was not so bad tonewise. The only mistake I made was to assume you were from the states and so might be swayed by talk about american capability.
 
franklinstower said:
Hey man. I just went back just to make sure I did not miss something really obvious that makes me an asshole here without realizing it. Do you know what I found? More lies and derailment from you. You have not been honest at all man. Not at all.

Here is the beginning of our exchange-- the very beginning. You quoted it earlier but left one part out. Here it is in full.

Other poster---
It seems that a massive shift in power to Russia is something potus is fine with. Emphasis added.

Here is your reply to him talking about Trump.

It is basically inevitable at this point anyway.

"The U.S. foreign policy of trying to bully and overthrow everybody is backfiring while Putin is going behind the scenes and using diplomacy to create allies.... and the foreign policy of the U.S. is making it even easier for him to do so."


Man you have asked me why I brought up Trump quite a few times and you have said you never brought him up and I did because I am a deranged Trump hater. I took your word for that. Imagine my surprise to go back and find that the initial exchange and reply of yours that I first responded to referenced Trump not to mention the thread is about the Trump admin.....
.


That initial reply was not so bad tonewise. The only mistake I made was to assume you were from the states and so might be swayed by talk about american capability.
Click to expand...

Nothing in my post said anything about Trump.

You still raged on him and then got further enraged when I mentioned Hilary..... mainly because you were too daft to actually get my point.... which I then had to explain to you further.... which you then promptly forgot all over again.
 
Fawlty said:
"lfd will try to shoehorn in a smug comment about Obama's unpopularity with the military"

uncanny accuracy, maybe the polls are real after all
Click to expand...

Dodge noted. You were just talking, and didn't have much of a point outside "Nuh uh".
 
lfd0311 said:
Dodge noted. You were just talking, and didn't have much of a point outside "Nuh uh".
Click to expand...
?

A poster was asking why we never saw Obama's polling numbers w/the military.

I let him know that he was wrong, and he should just google it.

At no point in this were your "walking in with your pants full of poop" services needed.
 
Fawlty said:
?

A poster was asking why we never saw Obama's polling numbers w/the military.

I let him know that he was wrong, and he should just google it.

At no point in this were your "walking in with your pants full of poop" services needed.
Click to expand...

Notice how your reply to his question was "They've been posted many times" and I simply asked you "what did they say?" yet instead of answering you're acting like I completely derailed the topic and started talking about something else. If they've been posted so much it was vaguely embarassing for him to bring it up at all, it should have been fairly easy for you to just generally give us all an idea as to what they indicated. Yet you did this instead. Probably because you're just talking and hoping nobody would actually challenge you on it, which is your go to schtick.
 
lfd0311 said:
Notice how your reply to his question was "They've been posted many times" and I simply asked you "what did they say?" yet instead of answering you're acting like I completely derailed the topic and started talking about something else. If they've been posted so much it was vaguely embarassing for him to bring it up at all, it should have been fairly easy for you to just generally give us all an idea as to what they indicated. Yet you did this instead. Probably because you're just talking and hoping nobody would actually challenge you on it, which is your go to schtick.
Click to expand...
go away

nobody likes you
 
lfd0311 said:
When did I say he was contentious? I said Liberals spent months trashing him for being an aggressive warhawk. Nice job though.
Click to expand...

It's a meaningless comment that serves no purpose.

You can find a Conservative or s Liberal trashing or championing anything.

But the liberals in the Senate supported him.

He was by far Trump's most praised appointment in his administration
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,607
Messages
58,449,441
Members
176,041
Latest member
jaybuff

Share this page

Back
Top