- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 5,603
- Reaction score
- 3,206
I think the context is that Khamzat is a former middleweight and plainly enormous for 170lbs. He last competed in wrestling at 92kg.
If you are not aware, he fought 2 of his 4 UFC bouts at middleweight so far. Maximov is saying its pretty weird a guy that size fought at welterweight, let alone calling out a career lightweight in Nate.
Pretty much all non-controversial stuff.
If Maximov got a middling UFC vet on the down slope who had name recognition but recent skid, that would be favorable. Instead he got two young prospects who have no name value but are tough guys. Nothing wrong with being booked that way, nothing wrong with talking about it in an interview either.
We know from court records these guys are getting paid peanuts. Everyone is trying to make a living, so when TMZ knows who you are and wants sound bytes, you need to say something.
Nothing to see here.
I mean those are decent points, but it is typical of fighters to fight at the lowest weight class they can reasonably make weight. I seriously doubt Chimaev is bigger than Usman, for example. Perhaps Maximov isn't doing that, but most are.
Chimaev facing easier challenges doesn't equate to "nobody else but Maximov". Both of Maximov's last opponents had to face an undefeated prospect first thing.
Then there are still other oddities. It's certainly not the worst MMA interview ever, but it fails to make sense on several levels.
Last edited: