NFL Discussion: Draft Day Looms

Will the Browns make good draft picks?


  • Total voters
    57
Status
Not open for further replies.
I really want the Giants to take Barkley because I'm so against it -> We can see if it turns out a good choice or not.
he'll probably be another bust rb from peen st.
 
Rosen is the dude I want the Bills to get, solely for the way he gives zero fucks.

Which ever QB they get will be the best of the draft though, no doubt.
 
I really want the Giants to take Barkley because I'm so against it -> We can see if it turns out a good choice or not.
You want that to happen because putting any RB behind that line will help your argument lol.
 
You want that to happen because putting any RB behind that line will help your argument lol.
Yea, putting an elite RB behind a shit line was part of my argument lol.
 
Anyway, I cant wait to see these RBs hit the league. Guice is a savage.
 
You want that to happen because putting any RB behind that line will help your argument lol.
Giants having bad run blocking is a myth. If Darkwa can average 4.4 ypc then i'd love to see what Barkley can do.
 
This seems irrelevant - But if Matt Ryan was in the same draft as Julio, I'm taking Ryan 10 out of 10 times.
Seems like a simple comparison to me.

A bad o-line, dont take a rb. A bad QB, dont take a WR?
 
Seems like a simple comparison to me.

A bad o-line, dont take a rb. A bad QB, dont take a WR?
The entire point was you don't take a RB that early.

Bad O-line just proved that a RBs success is dependent on the OL. A average RB like Alfred Morris can go average 5YPC behind the Cowboys OL. If you have a bad team (with a bad OL) no way you should be taking a RB that high
 
Giants having bad run blocking is a myth. If Darkwa can average 4.4 ypc then i'd love to see what Barkley can do.
I dont think thats entirely accurate. Lots of guys put up nice YPC when they have limited work loads.
The entire point was you don't take a RB that early.

Bad O-line just proved that a RBs success is dependent on the OL. A average RB like Alfred Morris can go average 5YPC behind the Cowboys OL. If you have a bad team (with a bad OL) no way you should be taking a RB that high
You think no RBs have had success behind bad lines? Thats nonsense.

Alfred Morris has been successful elsewhere also. In fact, he matched the 4.8 YPC in Washington.

And you still havent answered my question. If you have a shitty QB should you not take a top WR?
 
Alfred Morris has been successful elsewhere also. In fact, he matched the 4.8 YPC in Washington.

And you still havent answered my question. If you have a shitty QB should you not take a top WR?
Lynch comes to mind, especially at the end of his tenure in SEA.
 
I dont think thats entirely accurate. Lots of guys put up nice YPC when they have limited work loads.

You think no RBs have had success behind bad lines? Thats nonsense.

Alfred Morris has been successful elsewhere also. In fact, he matched the 4.8 YPC in Washington.

And you still havent answered my question. If you have a shitty QB should you not take a top WR?
I did answer your question - If I had a shitty QB I would taking the QB.
 
Lynch comes to mind, especially at the end of his tenure in SEA.
David Johnson most recently rings a bell. Ajayi as well with the Dolphcans.
 
I've answered this thing like 50 times. And I value WR over RB, so the point you are trying to make doesn't exist.
You say a RB depends on a line.

A WR depends on a QB. If you dont have a good QB should you not draft a top WR?

Very simple question. Pretty obvious why you dont want to answer it. Your duck attempt of “Id draft a top QB” isnt always applicable.
 
David Johnson most recently rings a bell. Ajayi as well with the Dolphcans.
An argument could be made for Packers RBs too. We don't have a trash line like the Donkeys or Pigeons but at the same time other than Bahk if Bulaga is hurt (when isn't he?) the rest of the line is pretty meh.
 
You say a RB depends on a line.

A WR depends on a QB. If you dont have a good QB should you not draft a top WR?

Very simple question. Pretty obvious why you dont want to answer it.
If I don't have a QB and a QB is on the board, I take the QB.

If I don't have a QB and no QB in on the board, I have no problem taking the WR.

Having a good RB is nice, spending #2 in this draft is dumb. I can rehash my points again but it's not really worth it because you couldn't comprehend the other 49 times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top