- Joined
- Feb 12, 2008
- Messages
- 63,373
- Reaction score
- 49,165
he'll probably be another bust rb from peen st.I really want the Giants to take Barkley because I'm so against it -> We can see if it turns out a good choice or not.
he'll probably be another bust rb from peen st.I really want the Giants to take Barkley because I'm so against it -> We can see if it turns out a good choice or not.
You want that to happen because putting any RB behind that line will help your argument lol.I really want the Giants to take Barkley because I'm so against it -> We can see if it turns out a good choice or not.
Yea, putting an elite RB behind a shit line was part of my argument lol.You want that to happen because putting any RB behind that line will help your argument lol.
Should a shitty QB team not take a top WR?Yea, putting an elite RB behind a shit line was part of my argument lol.
This seems irrelevant - But if Matt Ryan was in the same draft as Julio, I'm taking Ryan 10 out of 10 times.Should a shitty QB team not take a top WR?
Giants having bad run blocking is a myth. If Darkwa can average 4.4 ypc then i'd love to see what Barkley can do.You want that to happen because putting any RB behind that line will help your argument lol.
Seems like a simple comparison to me.This seems irrelevant - But if Matt Ryan was in the same draft as Julio, I'm taking Ryan 10 out of 10 times.
The entire point was you don't take a RB that early.Seems like a simple comparison to me.
A bad o-line, dont take a rb. A bad QB, dont take a WR?
I dont think thats entirely accurate. Lots of guys put up nice YPC when they have limited work loads.Giants having bad run blocking is a myth. If Darkwa can average 4.4 ypc then i'd love to see what Barkley can do.
You think no RBs have had success behind bad lines? Thats nonsense.The entire point was you don't take a RB that early.
Bad O-line just proved that a RBs success is dependent on the OL. A average RB like Alfred Morris can go average 5YPC behind the Cowboys OL. If you have a bad team (with a bad OL) no way you should be taking a RB that high
Lynch comes to mind, especially at the end of his tenure in SEA.Alfred Morris has been successful elsewhere also. In fact, he matched the 4.8 YPC in Washington.
And you still havent answered my question. If you have a shitty QB should you not take a top WR?
I did answer your question - If I had a shitty QB I would taking the QB.I dont think thats entirely accurate. Lots of guys put up nice YPC when they have limited work loads.
You think no RBs have had success behind bad lines? Thats nonsense.
Alfred Morris has been successful elsewhere also. In fact, he matched the 4.8 YPC in Washington.
And you still havent answered my question. If you have a shitty QB should you not take a top WR?
David Johnson most recently rings a bell. Ajayi as well with the Dolphcans.Lynch comes to mind, especially at the end of his tenure in SEA.
Cant answer huh?I did answer your question - If I had a shitty QB I would taking the QB.
I've answered this thing like 50 times. And I value WR over RB, so the point you are trying to make doesn't exist.Cant answer huh?
You say a RB depends on a line.I've answered this thing like 50 times. And I value WR over RB, so the point you are trying to make doesn't exist.
An argument could be made for Packers RBs too. We don't have a trash line like the Donkeys or Pigeons but at the same time other than Bahk if Bulaga is hurt (when isn't he?) the rest of the line is pretty meh.David Johnson most recently rings a bell. Ajayi as well with the Dolphcans.
If I don't have a QB and a QB is on the board, I take the QB.You say a RB depends on a line.
A WR depends on a QB. If you dont have a good QB should you not draft a top WR?
Very simple question. Pretty obvious why you dont want to answer it.