New rule for MMA math

clayj

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
7,772
Reaction score
0
If your MMA math has to use either:

Ryo Chonnan
Dennis Hallman
Matt Serra
Tsuyoshi Kusaka
or
Matt Hamill

it is just cheating and should be declared automatically invalid. It is the MMA math equivalent of Godwin's Law, you automatically lose. Am I forgetting any?

EDIT: Also, no Datsik
 
Last edited:
Can I still use Datsik to discredit Arlovski and any opponent he holds a victory over?
 
Any MMAth where the winner has lost the most recent matchup between the two is invalid.

For example, you're not allowed to use JDS > Cain, because Cain won their most recent encounter.
 
I love Sherdog for the same reasons I often dislike it - we're all rabid fans - we're all fight-nerds. But please could the admins put a yellow card on the term(s) 'MMA math' etc.
 
I actually like this. Since we will always have idiots using it, might as well force them to eat one of their feet while writing the garbage.
 
Why is Hallman on that list, is it because he beat Mat Hughes?
 
a fighter is a fighter.

if a fighter wins a fight, it is not cheating, it is how the world works.

this isn't pokemon or tic tac toe where there are stats and shit is supposed to be "fair".

clowns
 
Back
Top