• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

New Book "Chasing Hillary"

Ive heard the opposite. I heard shes unlikeable and insulting.

I think she acts the way she does because shes playing a character. The public Hillary Clinton is just an actor, willing to say or do anything to gain support.

Just think about the fact that she literally practices fake accents and local hillbilly slang in order to convince people to vote for her. Think about the personality of someone who would do that. She has something seriously wrong with her, and people can sense it. Shes a fraud.
I never heard that last part about her, but it doesn't matter. I already agree that she is robotic and unlikable, but I think you guys are placing too much weight on this issue as it pertains to politicians. We can elect people that you would love to have a beer with that are totally corrupt and incompetent and stupid, or we can elect people that are stiff, robotic and feel fake but are serious about policy.

I'll choose the latter every time.
 
You know, these conversations would be much more productive if people could honestly talk about her shortcomings instead of making absurd comparisons and attacking the intelligence of a highly intelligent, well-educated woman.
Is Hillary highly intelligent and well-educated yes.

Nobody can honestly claim otherwise.

But that is not enough.

You have to be able to make people believe in you and your message and you can't make mistakes like the deplorables comment,FBI investigation ect.Huma,debra schultz,what does it matter ect.

Hillary has never had the charisma speaking ability and personality of Bill and Obama to make people believe in them and overlook their flaws.

Hillary has also proven to be stubborn and unwilling to concede a mistake unless forced into doing so.

Hillary is highly intelligent and well-educated but her character flaws did her in.

Again a less intelligent less succesful female Richard Nixon.
 
Is Hillary highly intelligent and well-educated yes.

Nobody can honestly claim otherwise.

But that is not enough.

You have to be able to make people believe in you and your message and you can't make mistakes like the deplorables comment,FBI investigation ect.Huma,debra schultz,what does it matter ect.

Hillary has never had the charisma speaking ability and personality of Bill and Obama to make people believe in them and overlook their flaws.

Hillary has also proven to be stubborn and unwilling to concede a mistake unless forced into doing so.

Hillary is highly intelligent and well-educated but her character flaws did her in.

Again a less intelligent less succesful female Richard Nixon.
Everything is reasonable up until you compare her to Nixon. He was impeached and he really more intelligent than her? I don't know if he was and I don't see the point of the comparison. You notably added the "successful" part which in some ways is true except his legacy is horrendous, obviously.
 
I never heard that last part about her, but it doesn't matter. I already agree that she is robotic and unlikable, but I think you guys are placing too much weight on this issue as it pertains to politicians. We can elect people that you would love to have a beer with that are totally corrupt and incompetent and stupid, or we can elect people that are stiff, robotic and feel fake but are serious about policy.

I'll choose the latter every time.

What makes you think shes serious about policy? I never got that impression at all. I feel like shes serious about gaining money and power.

Were talking about a lady who was interviewed by hip hop artists and they asked her what she always keeps in her purse, she said "hot sauce".

She will literally say anything to get people to vote for her. Nothing she says is genuine. Why would you believe anything she says? She lies and manipulates people with her fake persona.
 
Last edited:
What makes you think shes serious about policy? I never got that impression at all. I feel like shes serious about gaining money and power.

She spoke extensively about policy.

Were talking about a lady who was interviewed by hip hop artists and they asked her what she always keeps in her purse, she said "hot sauce".

So?

She will literally say anything to get people to vote for her. Nothing she says is genuine. Why would you believe anything she says? She lies and manipulates peopke with her fake persona.

I mean, that's just not true. She has a long history with lots of experience to show that she does back up what she says. Again, I agree that she is robotic and unlikable, and that she, like many many politicians are "fake", but you guys take it way too far.

For example, what makes you think she doesn't actually agree with policies like paid child care/maternity leave, free state college education and making improvements to the ACA? There is literally no proof that she actually things these are shit policies but pushes them because she thinks it makes her popular.
 
Crazy that people still aren't done maligning her. This is mental illness.
 
Every time I read a few sentences in an article about Hillary I immediately remember how much I dislike that woman.
Not sure why? I am not even American.
30 years of mostly bullshit from the rightwing.
 
Crazy that people still aren't done maligning her. This is mental illness.
And furthermore, if you drop in to say she was flawed but people are taking it too far you're some kind of Hillary shill.
 
Everything is reasonable up until you compare her to Nixon. He was impeached and he really more intelligent than her? I don't know if he was and I don't see the point of the comparison. You notably added the "successful" part which in some ways is true except his legacy is horrendous, obviously.
Nixon was more intelligent then Hillary his paranoia did him in in the end.

Nixon came back from years in the political wilderness to win the presidency and did achieve alot during his terms in office.

Nixon was intelligent and highly educated but also robotic and not very likable which is why he is a good comparison to Hillary.

The difference lies in that Nixon succeeded where Hillary failed only failing at the end due to his paranoia destroying much of his legacy.



 
Nixon was more intelligent then Hillary his paranoia did him in in the end.

Nixon came back from years in the political wilderness to win the presidency and did achieve alot during his terms in office.

Nixon was intelligent and highly educated but also robotic and not very likable which is why he is a good comparison to Hillary.

The difference lies in that Nixon succeeded where Hillary failed only failing at the end due to his paranoia destroying much of his legacy.


Can you explain what the point of this comparison is?
 
"Paint" or "observe"? :eek::D
And this shit. Crowing maladjusted dipshits who loudly demonstrate that they know absolutely fuck-all about anything, but get a stabbing pain in their collective pussy every time their opposition doesn't handle them with kid gloves.
 
Really? Everyone on the left is a condescending asshole? I disagree bud.

I'd disagree with that too. Didn't look like you were using all as a standard for your comment though. Looking back, I guess you mean everyone on the right will always paint everyone on the left as blankety-blank? Sounds legit. :D


And this shit. Crowing maladjusted dipshits who loudly demonstrate that they know absolutely fuck-all about anything, but get a stabbing pain in their collective pussy every time their opposition doesn't handle them with kid gloves.

Case in point. Thanks.
 
Ive heard the opposite. I heard shes unlikeable and insulting.

I think she acts the way she does because shes playing a character. The public Hillary Clinton is just an actor, willing to say or do anything to gain support.

Just think about the fact that she literally practices fake accents and local hillbilly slang in order to convince people to vote for her. Think about the personality of someone who would do that. She has something seriously wrong with her, and people can sense it. Shes a fraud.
I know 2 people who say the same thing. One is ex-military/ LEO who is a very good friend who "knows a guy". I would dismiss it, but another friend, who is more politically aligned with me than my buddy, has a very close family member who said the exact same thing.
 
What makes you think shes serious about policy? I never got that impression at all. I feel like shes serious about gaining money and power.

Were talking about a lady who was interviewed by hip hop artists and they asked her what she always keeps in her purse, she said "hot sauce".

She will literally say anything to get people to vote for her. Nothing she says is genuine. Why would you believe anything she says? She lies and manipulates peopke with her fake persona.

I believe she's smart and serious about policy. But she's smart and serious about the wrong policies. She has very bad instincts.
She was Spock to Bill's Kirk, except not as emotional, instinctual, or charming as Spock. And much less of a necon.
 
Come on Jack, it's a well known fact that no white person genuinely likes hot sauce.

It's the perfect Clinton scandal in that it has already been proven to be completely false but partisans still cling viciously to it, and it drives the narrative about her.
 
Back
Top