- Joined
- Sep 2, 2008
- Messages
- 49,157
- Reaction score
- 1
Trust me, no one needs an excuse to call Ben an antisemite, he makes it real easy.
My problem with it is that it's silly code--- why not say Jew? What is the point of saying tribesman? No one USES that term. No one. I've never heard it outside of Sherdog.
Oiler said "fellow tribesman." In Judaism, all separate religious groups are tribes (well, not entirely, but it's easier to explain it like that). So Oiler saying "hey, you're my fellow tribesman, what's going on" makes sense.
For Ben to say it, it makes NO sense. Jews are not the only tribe in an old testament sense, and in every other sense, there IS no sense.
So it's weird, nonsensical word replacement, coming from a poster who has been dubbed for his statements in Israel threads before.
Are you high right now, Nicky? be honest.
This has always been my argument, since day 1, and you've heard it a thousand times.
There IS no Palestine until Britain made one. And the Palestinian people didn't rule that land until Britain gave it to them.
Deal with that.
could you be any more childish?
and now we are back to there was no palestine? lmao. pretty sure there is a map back in the 1400's of the region listed as palestine. the region of palestine have been there for quite some time.
but i know you zionists want everyone to believe your fairy tales. lol. at the end of the day though, what does it matter? just because they didn't get the white man's permission to live on THEIR land, doesn't make it any less theirs.
and so is tribesmen racist or not? i've heard jews use the term and it seemed like a term of affection not some racist term. and using the term jew up in here leads to the dubs. so i'll stick with zionist.