• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Netanyahu's gonna Netanyahu again

Trust me, no one needs an excuse to call Ben an antisemite, he makes it real easy.
My problem with it is that it's silly code--- why not say Jew? What is the point of saying tribesman? No one USES that term. No one. I've never heard it outside of Sherdog.
Oiler said "fellow tribesman." In Judaism, all separate religious groups are tribes (well, not entirely, but it's easier to explain it like that). So Oiler saying "hey, you're my fellow tribesman, what's going on" makes sense.
For Ben to say it, it makes NO sense. Jews are not the only tribe in an old testament sense, and in every other sense, there IS no sense.
So it's weird, nonsensical word replacement, coming from a poster who has been dubbed for his statements in Israel threads before.

Are you high right now, Nicky? be honest.



This has always been my argument, since day 1, and you've heard it a thousand times.

There IS no Palestine until Britain made one. And the Palestinian people didn't rule that land until Britain gave it to them.

Deal with that.

could you be any more childish?

and now we are back to there was no palestine? lmao. pretty sure there is a map back in the 1400's of the region listed as palestine. the region of palestine have been there for quite some time.

but i know you zionists want everyone to believe your fairy tales. lol. at the end of the day though, what does it matter? just because they didn't get the white man's permission to live on THEIR land, doesn't make it any less theirs.

and so is tribesmen racist or not? i've heard jews use the term and it seemed like a term of affection not some racist term. and using the term jew up in here leads to the dubs. so i'll stick with zionist.
 
Class definition of trolling from the dude on dubs.

just because i don't agree with your fairy tales doesn't mean i'm trolling.

as for apartheid:

Kerry: Israel risks becoming apartheid state

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middl...ming-apartheid-state-2014427234834614855.html

US Secretary of State John Kerry has said that Israel risks becoming "an apartheid state" if there is no two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

is our sec of state also trolling for suggesting israel is an apartheid state? he is saying if they don't create a solution they will then be an apartheid state, but currently there is no solution, so... they are currently an apartheid state.

The "crime of apartheid" include "inhumane acts
 
and now we are back to there was no palestine? lmao. pretty sure there is a map back in the 1400's of the region listed as palestine. the region of palestine have been there for quite some time.
Oxnard is also on a map. Does that mean the people of Oxnard is a country.
Palestine is the name of a region, it was never a name of a country. In the 1400s, the area was controlled by Mamluk warriors.

but i know you zionists want everyone to believe your fairy tales. lol. at the end of the day though, what does it matter? just because they didn't get the white man's permission to live on THEIR land, doesn't make it any less theirs.
Uh, yes it does. Weird thing to say from someone living on Native American land.

and so is tribesmen racist or not? i've heard jews use the term and it seemed like a term of affection not some racist term. and using the term jew up in here leads to the dubs. so i'll stick with zionist.

No one ever says "tribesmen." Maybe you've heard a Jew say "MY Tribesmen" because in the Jewish faith, there are many "tribes" (the religion came out in nomadic days, y'known?) but no one just says "tribesmen." Which is why Ben's statement, along with his other statements, is questionable.
 
Oxnard is also on a map. Does that mean the people of Oxnard is a country.
Palestine is the name of a region, it was never a name of a country. In the 1400s, the area was controlled by Mamluk warriors.


Uh, yes it does. Weird thing to say from someone living on Native American land.



No one ever says "tribesmen." Maybe you've heard a Jew say "MY Tribesmen" because in the Jewish faith, there are many "tribes" (the religion came out in nomadic days, y'known?) but no one just says "tribesmen." Which is why Ben's statement, along with his other statements, is questionable.

lmao. oxnard is a city, in the state of CA. are you even trying to make a point?

and native americans have equal rights under the law. if israel gave full citizenship to the palestinians and had equal rights under the law, i'd be a huge supporter. but the fact is they don't because they don't want muslims in the ooccupied terroritories to have the right to vote. this is apartheid, this is one race oppressing another, this is bigoted policy, it's designed to make sure jews control israel, but when you take the west bank and gaza into account the jews aren't the majority in palestine.

no i've heard a jewish co working speaking to a client saying "oh one of the tribe huh" because he had found out the client was also jewish. so i just don't think it seems racist. i never would have figured that for a racist statement. doesn't seem like it's bad, there are more than enough negative words he could have used.
 
Israel is not an apartheid state as Arabs have identical rights to Jews.

no they don't, immigration rights are not equal and you know it. jews get autmatic citizenship and non jews don't. that's not equal.

further, we are speaking about the occupied palestinians not having equal rights, israel is obviously stealing the rest of the land, so fine, then give the people equal rights. if not, it's apartheid. even our own sec of state is saying as much. deal with it.
 
lmao. oxnard is a city, in the state of CA. are you even trying to make a point?
Lol, that WAS my point, Einstein.
The maps in 1400s weren't saying "This is the autonomous country of Palestine" they were saying "This is the Palestine region." These are all European maps, no Middle Eastern map to my knowledge.

and native americans have equal rights under the law. if israel gave full citizenship to the palestinians and had equal rights under the law, i'd be a huge supporter. but the fact is they don't because they don't want muslims in the ooccupied terroritories to have the right to vote. this is apartheid, this is one race oppressing another, this is bigoted policy, it's designed to make sure jews control israel, but when you take the west bank and gaza into account the jews aren't the majority in palestine.
Native Americans have full rights of the WHITE MAN'S LAW.
It's completely irrelevant to my point, you're trying to move the goal post to weasel out of addressing this.
No one GAVE American's permission to come to America and settle in America. So it's ridiculous you think the Palestinians have some right to the land that the Native American's don't, despite the fact that the Native Americans had control of the land even till the late 1800s, while the Arabs didn't have any control over the Palestinian/Israel region since the 1100s....

no i've heard a jewish co working speaking to a client saying "oh one of the tribe huh" because he had found out the client was also jewish. so i just don't think it seems racist. i never would have figured that for a racist statement. doesn't seem like it's bad, there are more than enough negative words he could have used.

Haha, oh, right, your "Jewish" friend. Thanks Bebop.
He's the only one who says it.
And I never said it was a racist term, it's not racist because it's never used. But Ben is just using it to replace the word "Jew." I said it was a code word, not a racial epitaph.
 
Lol, that WAS my point, Einstein.
The maps in 1400s weren't saying "This is the autonomous country of Palestine" they were saying "This is the Palestine region." These are all European maps, no Middle Eastern map to my knowledge.


Native Americans have full rights of the WHITE MAN'S LAW.
It's completely irrelevant to my point, you're trying to move the goal post to weasel out of addressing this.
No one GAVE American's permission to come to America and settle in America. So it's ridiculous you think the Palestinians have some right to the land that the Native American's don't, despite the fact that the Native Americans had control of the land even till the late 1800s, while the Arabs didn't have any control over the Palestinian/Israel region since the 1100s....



Haha, oh, right, your "Jewish" friend. Thanks Bebop.
He's the only one who says it.
And I never said it was a racist term, it's not racist because it's never used. But Ben is just using it to replace the word "Jew." I said it was a code word, not a racial epitaph.

amazing to see you support apartheid lol. typical zionist.

and the native americans have the right to vote, so no, they live under american laws that they participate in making. the palestinians who are occupied can't do that. which you already knew, and you know how completely baseless your comparison is, but you make it anyways to deflect from israel, zionism 101.

you are trying to compare unfair treatment hundreds of years ago to unfair treatment happening today, which again, shows you are just a bigot who is trying to cover for israel.

and if it's not racist what the hell are you complaining for? jesus!
 
lol, and here we go, kerry tells the truth and the shit hits the fan.

Cantor demands Kerry apologize to Israel

http://thehill.com/policy/international/204564-cantor-demands-kerry-apologize-to-israel

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) on Monday demanded that Secretary of State John Kerry apologize to Israel for alleged comments likening the Jewish state to South Africa’s racist apartheid regime.

"Reports that Secretary Kerry has suggested Israel is becoming an apartheid state are extremely disappointing. The use of the word apartheid has routinely been dismissed as both offensive and inaccurate, and Secretary Kerry’s use of it makes peace even harder to achieve,” Cantor said.
 
before they begin, I like to applaud you for trying to completely squeeze out the "there was no country or state of Palestine before the mandate of Britain" argument when you looked like you were losing. A+ dodging skills.

I also would like to applaud you for accusing me of supporting apartheid when there was really nothing I said that referenced that

and the native americans have the right to vote, so no, they live under american laws that they participate in making. the palestinians who are occupied can't do that. which you already knew, and you know how completely baseless your comparison is, but you make it anyways to deflect from israel, zionism 101.
Again, you are moving the goalpost.
The Americans came in and SETTLED ON NATIVE AMERICAN LAND THAT THE NATIVE AMERICANS OWNED. If you believe the Palestinians deserve the land because they lived there before the Jews (even though they never controlled the land), then you must believe the Native Americans actually deserve American land, full citizen rights or not.
Right?
Right?

you are trying to compare unfair treatment hundreds of years ago to unfair treatment happening today, which again, shows you are just a bigot who is trying to cover for israel.
What?

and if it's not racist what the hell are you complaining for? jesus!

You're getting confused. Put down the glue for a second.
It's not a racial epitaph
It's not really a thing
Ben is NEWLY using it instead of saying "Jew" which makes it racial in his case.
What is hard about this concept?
 
now he's got aipac going after him too, i wonder if he will be forced to apologize for telling the truth.

wake up america! this is a foreign country controlling our political system.

John Kerry Is Getting Slammed For Using The 'A-Word' With Israel

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/john...-palestine-peace-process-2014-4#ixzz30DjtYWaT

Secretary of State John Kerry came under fire from Jewish leaders and groups over his reported comments over the weekend warning that Israel could become an "apartheid state" if the latest round of peace talks with Palestine fail.

Kerry's comments came in a closed-door meeting of the Trilateral Commission, before senior officials from the United States, Europe, Russia, and Japan. They broke a longstanding taboo of American officials on using the loaded term to describe Israel — and Kerry is the most-senior U.S. official to have ever used it.

Jewish groups and leaders immediately denounced the comment, using a variety of adjectives — "loaded," "inaccurate," disturbing," "inappropriate," and "offensive" were only a few. Though many senior Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, were silent on the comments, U.S. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor demanded an apology from Kerry.

AIPAC, the powerhouse pro-Israel lobby, said Kerry's reported remarks were "deeply troubling."
 
You're getting confused. Put down the glue for a second.
It's not a racial epitaph
It's not really a thing
Ben is NEWLY using it instead of saying "Jew" which makes it racial in his case.
What is hard about this concept?

so now you can read ben's mind? gtfo with your nonsense.
 
if he didn't mean to say Jew, what DID he mean to say?

obviously he was speaking about jews but how is it racist? if i am speaking about samoan guys and use the term bruddas is that racist? you are just looking to pointing your finger and anyone you can and cry anti semite.

you don't read minds and he used a term that is in no way offensive.
 
obviously he was speaking about jews but how is it racist? if i am speaking about samoan guys and use the term bruddas is that racist? you are just looking to pointing your finger and anyone you can and cry anti semite.

you don't read minds and he used a term that is in no way offensive.

Why didn't he just say Jew?

Also, fuck, "Bruddas" you are so white.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,077
Messages
58,412,406
Members
176,031
Latest member
Golden Rhino
Back
Top