Nate looks heavier, larger than Conor...arms thicker.

Height**

That pic does give that appearance but when there's others next to each other where you can tell Nick has some more thickness to him.

And the exterior muscle isn't what's the most different, facts are Nick is much more dense than Nate. Nick fought at "LW" very early in his career but mostly fought at 170, where he has stated how draining it was and a 175-180 catchweight is his ideal weight.

Where Nate was an undersized WW who has never seemed to struggle with 155. He says he likes that's weight and feels good at it. The RDA fight was clearly personal issues, considering he never missed before.

Nick is legit one full weight class bigger. Its not "huge" but, Nick wasn't at a size disadvantage against Silva, Nate would have been. Idk how else to put it lol
Nate has stated multiple times he has to starve himself to make 155, let's not get it twisted.
 
Whatever you say. Im not out here starting threads every time my favourite fighter takes a shit. I just speak my mind, and talk that sass.

dealwithit.gif

Here ya go...
il_570xN.793522548_dds7.jpg
 
They both have similar skeletal structures, just Nate is taller and longer. Some men are longer than others!
 
Pretty impressed how diminutive Conor looks standing against Nate holy crap. I guess it's rough when you can't have that weight advantage. I think we will know how this will play out within the first round. Either Conor has some master gameplan or it's going to the floor and he will get submitted.
Rubbish they are the exact same size....
 
Nate has stated multiple times he has to starve himself to make 155, let's not get it twisted.

Dude Nate won TUF at 155, where he had to make 155 three times in 6 weeks. He"s bigger than Connor, but in terms of mass there's not a huget difference.

The wat the weight classes stand they are both best suited for 155, but in a perfect world Connor would probably be best suited for a 150lb weight class and Nate would be best suited for a 160lb weight class.
 
People aren't two dimensional. They are three dimensional. Nick is quite a bit thicker. Also, Nate is closer to the camera. Camera angle, bro.

This. Comparing pics of people is useless, because so much can be thrown off by the lenses perspective. You're best of using gifs if you want to compare size.
 
Nate has stated multiple times he has to starve himself to make 155, let's not get it twisted.


Yeah thats true - most of these guys are just eating peanut butter sandwiches and hopping on the scale

eddie-alvarez-ufc-188.jpg
 
It was always a big FW against a big LW, a solid weight class between them. (Like what happened to Nate when he faced large WW's).
 
Dude Nate won TUF at 155, where he had to make 155 three times in 6 weeks. He"s bigger than Connor, but in terms of mass there's not a huget difference.

The wat the weight classes stand they are both best suited for 155, but in a perfect world Connor would probably be best suited for a 150lb weight class and Nate would be best suited for a 160lb weight class.
I'm just repeating what Nate has stated multiple times.
 
I don't trust a man that says he isn't attracted to Sean Connery
I'm more of a Bill Murray guy. Just fuckin around. Faded and about to crash. Peace out sherdoggers. Crazy night. Ill be crazy hoping Anderson lands some crazy knees. I wish it was a title fight. Why not?
 
Nate's training to knock Conor out.

Conor is training to not get choked out.
 
You just noticed that now, TS??? You know they fought like a few months ago right, when it was quite obvious there was a big size and weight discrepancy between the two?? Are people really this forgetful?
 
Back
Top