- Joined
- Oct 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1,822
- Reaction score
- 0
Sent you an invite.
That's 3 Sherbettors jumping in... Anyone else interested?
Just for shits? Im in but really dont follow it enough? How much work is this going to take?
Sent you an invite.
That's 3 Sherbettors jumping in... Anyone else interested?
I really like det-.5, nyi, and was
again fading nyr on the road playing backup. All month making me money
FUCCCCCCCCCK. I tailed everyone's NHL bets but accidentally bet first period!
I wouldn't say he is a terrible bet, but Gaethje is a great prospect. D1 wrestling background, with some aggressive striking that has lots of variety to it. Although he faded a bit, and didn't look very good in his last fight with Cobb imo, he should beat Lauzon. And Lauzon he has only fought once in the last 2 years.
I'm interested if you'd let me join you guys. Tried to pm you but couldn't
Just for shits? Im in but really dont follow it enough? How much work is this going to take?
Pretty dumb that WSOF if forcing you to use Google Chrome just to watch the prelims for today's event. Their stream won't work with FF nor IE.
Even the person controlling the WSOF Twitter account is telling you to download Chrome to watch it. Pretty sad, considering we're in 2013.
5D just removed the entire undercard lines for WSOF.
Just got done watching UFN on DVR. I'm buried over here. It will be tough to dig back to break even.
LOL at the goofball who was previously arguing here that MMA judging isn't that bad. Now Vila got robbed, in a UD. Not only are there inexplicable judging decisions, somehow they are often UD. You see plenty of fights even where one guy clearly won 30-27, and one or two judges score it that way for the opposite fighter. That's what makes it such a problem, the egregiousness of the errors. You're not being the voice of reason pointing out it doesn't happen that much, when you see on average about 1 incorrect decision per card to maybe two, half the 12 or so fights don't call upon the judges to rule, and a good portion of the ones that do are dominations where it'd be impossible to score it for the real loser. Yeah, judging is a HUGE problem in this sport. Few people are worse at their jobs than them. They're so easily influenced by crowds, uneducated about the non stand-up striking aspect of the game, and are short-sighted weighting what happened at the end of the round so heavily.
I don't usually hedge much, but what do you guys think I should do with this Iaquinta/Moraes parlay? I'm totally sold on Moraes, but this is one of my bigger bets of the night and it would suck if Carson was able to wrassle his way to Dec.
You guys think I should let it ride or hedge it out a bit in case the upset happens?
I don't usually hedge much, but what do you guys think I should do with this Iaquinta/Moraes parlay? I'm totally sold on Moraes, but this is one of my bigger bets of the night and it would suck if Carson was able to wrassle his way to Dec.
You guys think I should let it ride or hedge it out a bit in case the upset happens? Leaning towards letting it ride, not a fan of hedging unless of course it's after I lose.