- Joined
- Jun 20, 2003
- Messages
- 4,919
- Reaction score
- 121
Football etc players aren't necessarily athletic. Brady is not athletic. Most linemen are not athletic. Rbs, wr, dB, safeties.. They are athletic. Most boxers aren't very athletic... Even with all the money they make. George Forman for example. Not athletic.
If u go by definition... Strong, health.. Good at sports... Then I guess u would have to say someone like khabib is a level. He's good at his sport.. Strong.. Unbeaten. So in definitive terms he's A level. By definition, anyone who is in the top 10 would be an a level athlete .. At their sport which is fighting. If they are good at it they are athletic, if they are top guys.. That makes em a level. Then u look at say Roy Nelson... Not the picture u think of when u hear the word athletic. Had he won a belt and been say 33 and 1 in his career... By definition he would be a level.
I think the problem is people think by athletic... It means strong.. Dexterity off the chart... Healthy.. And dominating in anything they do. That's not the case at all. Sumo wrestlers are athletes, so the best are a level. They are strong for sure, but would they be good at hockey? If so we would have surely seen a sumo wrestler be a goalie seeing he would block most of the net when not even moving.
Any definition that's reasonable on the internet says top guys.. Excells at their sport.. Makes national or Olympic team.. So if u use that as a definition... There are many a level mma guys. If u made an mma national team or Olympic team... The guys would come from the ufc mostly because they are the best. Just like when NBA or NHL players do Olympics.
If u go by definition... Strong, health.. Good at sports... Then I guess u would have to say someone like khabib is a level. He's good at his sport.. Strong.. Unbeaten. So in definitive terms he's A level. By definition, anyone who is in the top 10 would be an a level athlete .. At their sport which is fighting. If they are good at it they are athletic, if they are top guys.. That makes em a level. Then u look at say Roy Nelson... Not the picture u think of when u hear the word athletic. Had he won a belt and been say 33 and 1 in his career... By definition he would be a level.
I think the problem is people think by athletic... It means strong.. Dexterity off the chart... Healthy.. And dominating in anything they do. That's not the case at all. Sumo wrestlers are athletes, so the best are a level. They are strong for sure, but would they be good at hockey? If so we would have surely seen a sumo wrestler be a goalie seeing he would block most of the net when not even moving.
Any definition that's reasonable on the internet says top guys.. Excells at their sport.. Makes national or Olympic team.. So if u use that as a definition... There are many a level mma guys. If u made an mma national team or Olympic team... The guys would come from the ufc mostly because they are the best. Just like when NBA or NHL players do Olympics.
Last edited:
