Lol, I addressed other people before you because they actually have a brain and understand fighting. No. You claimed you had no time to debate when I was able to pin you down on your bias, you then came back and started talking shit without ever addressing my points.
You've been talking out your ass for as long as I've known you Ironic
Remember that hydroxycloroquine thread. Where you felt the incessant need to chime in, even parrot the mainstream narrative in spite of doing no research on the topic whatsoever. I want to stay on topic but the fact you still push this is hilarious.
that's you.
You don't even care about the truth. Just want to perpetuate some shitty narrative in your distorted, small minded version of reality.
That is literally what you have done in this thread. You have perpetuated the shitty narrative that MJW is an elite striker despite being unable to produce any evidence of him ever fighting. When pushed on this you start appealing to intangibles and claiming that watching him train is enough because you are trained and can see it. That is not evidence, that is your own biased view.
You literally spent the last few pages making incoherent posts, not even clarifying what your points were or what you took offense to. My posts were perfectly clear, I made a point, which you refused to acknowledge without direct quotation. I begrudgingly went back and provided quotes on two separate occasions, you ignored this.
You've been attempting to sound intelligent and coming off as tryhard, forced and failing miserably.
I have tried to sound intelligent how?
your ability to construct a clear, concise and articulate argument is comically bad.
Once again, the irony.
it's very clear to see that I've been speaking some truth in these last few pages. If you understand anything about fighting, it should be clear what MJW is bringing to the table skill wise.
The only thing we KNOW that MJW brings to the skillwise is choreographed fight moves. Your proof of his striking doesnt contain any full contact sparring/fights. None. Your unbiased view is that you have decided by watching him move that he has great striking. In what world is that not completely biased?
The question is whether that he has the ability to take a punch. he has that warrior mentality. he has that toughness. That is he question, not his skills.
Except his skills ARE in question, and more importantly how they would fare in a fight with Mike Perry. We are not talking about can he execute martial arts techniques with great technique, literally no one has argued against that. The debate is could he beat Mike Perry in a fight.
I provided a lot of evidence which paints a picture of his skillset, style, strengths and highlighted the overall bigger picture of what he brings to the table as a martial artist.
You provided no evidence of how his skills apply to a fight, which is the point. All your evidence is based on your own biased interpretation of his striking skills.
The evidence is there, it simply requires a person to understand boxing. To understand striking. To understand footwork and movement. To understand the subtle hip, core, shoulder and feet rotations into each strike. To understand the ideal head position and movement upon each strike thrown.
I would be more than happy for you to give us even a sneak peak at your knowledge, please tell us about MJWs boxing technique that makes you so confident about his skill level?
It requires a person to take heed to testimony like Rogan, who understands more about elite kicking game than 99% of humans on the planet. Who personally attested to his elite Kyokushin prowess.
Its not surprising you are a big fan of Joe, and by extension hyperbole, anecdotal evidence and just flat out unsubstantiated garbage. I know Joe knows about kicking technique. I believe that MJW has great kicking technique. I have never seen any evidence of how that would apply to a real life scenario. Joe Rogan claiming MJW has great kicking technique proves only that Joe Rogan thinks that MJW has great kicking technique.
Even things like movies. Yes, they're choreographed and the unrealistic shit should be ignored. But the techniques being demonstrated are very real.
What isn't demonstrated is how they apply to real life.
The short clip against Machida was not choreographed. They were just flowing, playing. However, it painted a picture of the kind of attributes and style you could expect from him. Much in line from what we've seen from traditional martial artists like Machida and wonderboy who made it to the top of their respective divisions.
The difference, two out of those three have fought and won at the highest level. The other is an actor.
emphasis on things like elite distance control, ability to fight and counter off the back foot, countering prowess, movement, balance and footwork, etc.
Once again literally no evidence of this in real life.
Sometimes evidence doesn't come in the most obvious form. We are left to our own devices.
Do you want to elaborate? there is a big waft of bias coming from that statement.
My logic is using every piece of information at our disposal to form a clear picture of where he stands as a martial artist.
We have no information on how he applies his martial arts in real life, once again, the point of the thread.
ultimately this relies on someone understanding all the things I've mentioned.
And then blindly asserting he would easily beat Perry.
If you don't understand the game, you aren't going to see the truth in what I say.
You haven't said much other than you can what you can tell because of your unquantifiable or provable knowledge.
and that's the reality here. many of you guys simply don't seem capable of watching, discerning and getting a feel for someone a skills from footage. Which indicates to me that very few of you understand much about boxing, striking, movement and a whole host of other attributes that make up a quality martial artist
This isn't about me having some magic eye. Literally show the same footage to anyone in a decent boxing / striking gym and they'd say the same things I have. It's called having fight iq and the ability to recognize skills.
Fight IQ relates to fighters and how they strategise and adapt in a fight. Also its called having a biased opinion of someones skills.
It's not about me being special. it's about many of you guys just not understanding what you're watching.
Like I said before, you don't care about the truth. You just want to right. You're just being a contrarian when in reality you probably don't understand half the shit being said. Why else would you ask me to repeat / explain myself and articulate my position. You don't even understand the points being made.
I actually wanted you to repeat yourself because that is how you debate, you ask for clarification on someones points. However, you would rather just duck, dodge and dive anytime I wanted to address even one of your bullshit claims.
no different than that hydroxycloroquine thread