• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Men's Watch 2019 Buy List

Awesome pick!

I love the Junghans Meister collection. The Chronoscope Day Date is a masterpiece, as far as I'm concerned.

I thought I was going to love the Junghans Meister Telemeter (don't have a real life photo, unfortunately). You've got that gorgeous silvered dial with the beautifully scalloped sub-dials, the vintage inspired lume, and cool tachymetre and telemeter scales, all really attractive in photos.

JUNGHANS_MEISTER_TELEMETER_DIAL_8.jpg


But in person, it absolutely *dominates* my wrist and wears way bigger than the measurements suggest. I think this is because the watch face itself is so large compared to the overall diameter of the watch. I have the same problem with the Nomos stuff. I also didn't like the look of the "crystal". And considering how beat up my mineral glass watch crystals get, I'd end up polishing the Junghans every other week haha!

Lastly, it was really hard to even find one to try on.

Edit: Dang, looking at that photo is making me want the watch again, it just looks so damn gorgeous!
 
I don't like it. But I figured you'd enjoy seeing a comparison review. The reviewer is a douche, but he's on the mark in some ways. lol

I don't have time to watch a half hour review, but when I look at the Black Bay Chrono it looks to me like someone trying to create a greatest hits collection watch and ending up with Frankentein. The tachymetre bezel is attractive and makes the watch somewhat Daytona-esque and motor sports oriented; as does the fact that it is a chronograph. But then you have the big lume and water resistance of a diver, without the rotating bezel of a diver. You've also got the Black Bay's snowflake hand, which in a chronograph can block large parts of the sub-dials for long periods of time. And since this is in a "heritage" line, why isn't the arrangement of the sub-dials similar to the original Tudor chrono (which IIRC was three sub-dials like the Daytona but rotated 90 degrees)?

I like tons of individual elements from this watch, but the whole doesn't hang together somehow for me. At a glance it looks very good though.
 
Last edited:
During the holidays I looked at a few watches (some of which I show below) and it really brought home to me how important it is to try them on your wrist instead of trust the internet. When you look at photos on the web, you typically see the watches much larger than how they will appear on your wrist in life size. I was surprised again and again by the watches I tried.

For example, I thought I was going to really like the IWX Mark XVIII (I couldn't find a Heritage to try) given its simple, clear dial and no-nonsense looks.

IWCMarkXVIII_zpskurhhdti.jpg


But it turns out I didn't like the sharp edges on the case; it wasn't comfortable to wear. Also, the lume dots at the cardinals are a slightly different colour than the unlumed hour markers. Finally, the date window looks too bar in-board to me; for symmetry, it should appear approximately where the 9 is on the other side. at about $5000 USD I thought this was expensive for what you get.

I also tried a Tudor Ranger. I originally resisted because I thought it would be too big for me.

TudorRanger_zpshuucimle.jpg


I think the size is mostly OK, but I wish the bezel was a bit larger and the dial a big smaller. I like the style of the hands (and pop of colour from the seconds hand), the minute markers, the font used for the hour fonts, and the "vintage" colour of all the markings. If the face was smaller this would be a contender for me. It is affordable too, because of the ETA movement, at only about $2.6k USD.

I also tried a Grand Seiko, and it's true that you have to see one in real life. You don't really understand what the finishing is like without seeing it in person and in motion.

The reason I considered the Seiko is because I wanted something that was less flashy, that wasn't obviously expensive. I also think that although it is a sports watch, it is formal enough that I could wear it with a suit too. The Grand Seiko I wanted to look at was the most basic automatic (SBGR0253) but I couldn't find one anywhere to try, including the Grand Seiko shop at Narita airport! The one in the photo below is essentially the same style but scaled up to larger size.

GrandSeikoHiBeat_zpskphy0qia.jpg

This is basically the style of the standard "sarariman" watch in Japan. If you ask a Japanese kid to draw a watch I'm sure this is what you would get. I was kind of thinking of this as the Acura of the watch world -- Acura when they first came out, not the zombie, Americanized company of today. That is, a scrappy upstart showing that premium could mean good engineering, build quality and clean styling without all the luxury frou-frou of the European incumbents.

But when you actually wear one of these you find that instead of being relatively anonymous, it is actually unbelievably blingy. Because of the high polish they apply to the steel, and the faceted hour markers, the watch blinks and winks at you from almost any angle (you can see this at the 10 o'clock marker in my photo). And I don't know about you, but I associate highly, highly polished silver surfaces to be cheap chrome plating over plastic on crappy toys and the like. I'd have to overcome some mental blocks to fully appreciate this watch.

FInally, the grail.

I wasn't inclined to like the Rolex Explorer in the box, and found it disappointing after seeing it in real life. I wasn't even going to try it on originally. But once I did it just felt so right.

RolexExplorer_zpsej2s9i8g.jpg


Before I had it on wrist, I was thinking that a vintage model would be more interesting (and I did try one later) because of the more compact size. But it's hard to emphasize just how good this felt on wrist. It didn't have the finish quality of the Seiko, and is largely mass produced by machine instead of hand built like the GS, so it is hard to pay over twice the price of the Seiko (and you don't even get an exhibition case back! [yes, I understand that would go against the marketing of the Explorer as the "adventure" watch]) But the Explorer felt so perfect and at abot $6k USD is still very affordable - for a semi-luxury watch, that is.

I didn't end up buying one though because when I went back the next morning to buy it, it had been sold; and I had seen it just the previous evening as the store was opening their newly delivered stock! It's quite hard to get your hands on one if you aren't a repeat customer I understand.

Then I thought some more about how I have hurt every single watch I have ever owned, either gouging the crystal, breaking something in the mechanism or smacking the watch hard enough to break the case off the strap. I reconsidered daily wearing something in that price range. And if I wasn't going to wear it, then what was the point of even owning it?
The grand seiko is stunning! I’d still take the explorer even if the gs is technically a better watch, the hype is real! I’m turning into a Rolex fanboy lol
 
Same one I’ve wanted since 2006 (Bond wore it in Casino Royale - yes, that’s why I want it and for no other logical reason).

Omega Seamaster Diver 300M
omega-seamaster-222080-james-bond-watch-casino-royale-2006-460.jpg

I really like that watch. I got a promotion this year and thought about getting either that one, or an Aqua Terra with my first bonus.
c79defo3jgzc3ezhbsbs_e91f006a-e5ee-49fc-ace8-627cf1a8a917_320x.jpg


However it wasn't as big as I had originally thought, so I got a Steinhart Ocean 2 Premium instead.
SteinhartOcean2PremiumWhite1.jpg


IllI'save the Omega for next year!
 
I really like that watch. I got a promotion this year and thought about getting either that one, or an Aqua Terra with my first bonus.
c79defo3jgzc3ezhbsbs_e91f006a-e5ee-49fc-ace8-627cf1a8a917_320x.jpg


However it wasn't as big as I had originally thought, so I got a Steinhart Ocean 2 Premium instead.
SteinhartOcean2PremiumWhite1.jpg


IllI'save the Omega for next year!

I like and agree with this plan. And congratulations on the promotion, that’s awesome!
 
7021-1g-001-c4.png


Patek Philippe
Nautilus 7021 White Gold / Diamond
Full rotor automatic movement by Patek. Total of 213 parts including 29 jewels. Geneva Seal certified.
The Patek Philippe Nautilus 7021/1G-0011 features a white gold case (33.6mm) and matching bracelet - both featuring a grdless diamond setting. The dial is done in matching style.

Mechanical self-winding movement
Caliber 324 S C
Sweep second hand
Fully set with diamonds, gridless setting
18K gold dial plate
Each watch is unique
Model shown: ~2328 diamonds (~9.05 ct.)
Fold-over clasp
Sapphire-crystal case back
Water resistant to 30 m
White gold
Case diameter (10-4 o'clock): 33.6 mm
 
I really like that watch. I got a promotion this year and thought about getting either that one, or an Aqua Terra with my first bonus.
c79defo3jgzc3ezhbsbs_e91f006a-e5ee-49fc-ace8-627cf1a8a917_320x.jpg


However it wasn't as big as I had originally thought, so I got a Steinhart Ocean 2 Premium instead.
SteinhartOcean2PremiumWhite1.jpg


IllI'save the Omega for next year!
Congrats on the promotion and nice watch!
 
Bell & Ross BR S-92 Officer Silver
ed232758.jpg

Isn't this one kind of missing the point a little? What I mean is most of the appeal of Bell & Ross (to me) is the aircraft instrumentation inspiration, which implies white on black. Silver on silver seems non-ideal for legibility :)

BTW, look what you made me do!

AmazonOrderWatch_zpsvmp8jur2.png

I don't need another watch right now! But the value for about $350 US dollars is just so high and this thread reminded me I had been wanting one for a daily wearer.
 
Last edited:
Batman GMT. I’ve been waiting for a while and I just got a call from my AD that they’re getting a couple in. Still unsure if I wanna pull the trigger but I’m tempted. It’s either this or a submariner, but that will probably be a longer wait for availability.

upload_2019-5-16_21-36-34.jpeg
 
The omni-present, and almost oppressive, Omega Speedmaster Pro advertising lately (almost as bad as Tudor!) reminded me that I never updated the thread...

Here's the Seiko I picked up:



I was originally a bit worried that the watch was overrated (since it seems to be an Internet darling) but I love it. The curved case feels more organic and comfortable to me than some of the more orthogonal ones. The lume and steel bracelet take away just enough formality. About 5 to 6 seconds fast per day, so not bad for this price range.

I had said upthread that I wanted to get a Rolex Explorer I but this gives me 80% of what I like about the Explorer so I might hold off on that for a while. The Speedy advertising is really getting to me though.

The problem is I'm really torn about the Omega. On one hand, I would want a watch that had all the convenience or cosmetic features (ie: sapphire crystal, automatic movement, exhibition back) but those are all things that detract from it's suitability as a space watch and lessens it's authenticity in my mind, even though I recognize that I will never actually use a watch in space... What to do, what to do...
 
So, I swore off any new watches about a year ago. But, I'm currently considering: Pre-Owned Rolex Date 15200

I gotta get my life together. LOL Definitely going to wait a full six months to make sure I'm not going through a phase.

 
Back
Top