Meme Thread v16: Korean Summit Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is dishonest. It's not a matter of D vs R, dishonesty 1. It's reflective of social change, not anger at a political party. That's projection.
Dishonesty two follows immediately, that the conclusion has anything to do with the premise.
Do you actually believe those words you just posted?
 
CNN has been leading the charge in pushing that narrative.
So has the intelligence community.

You know, that agencies thingy that's full of people assessing threats, not threads. People who actively investigate these things, not Sherdog war roomers.

I think I'll trust the people that protect us with action, instead of Putin on rose-colored glasses.
 
Do you actually believe those words you just posted?
Yes. The first statement is untrue.
What follows is fruit of a poisonous tree. Show your work.

Why is the first statement true, and how does it reasonably lead to the conclusion?
 
So has the intelligence community.

You know, that agencies thingy that's full of people assessing threats, not threads. People who actively investigate these things, not Sherdog war roomers.

I think I'll trust the people that protect us with action, instead of Putin on rose-colored glasses.
The Russia collusion thing at this point is fiction created by the MSM. Not saying more couldn't come from it but its basically BS right now. CNN's own staff have been caught saying its BS.
 
They'll overdose on prescription drugs before too long.

Unfortunately they'll probably live to be 100, and instead somebody with talent and potential will overdose in their place. That seems to be the way these things go.
 
Yes. The first statement is untrue.
What follows is fruit of a poisonous tree. Show your work.

Why is the first statement true, and how does it reasonably lead to the conclusion?
How come those statues only became such an issue when Trump was elected? The civil rights battle was decades ago.

<seedat>


This is just part of the nationwide tantrum the left has been having, trying to break everything they believe represents the right (though most of those memorialized were democrats) . Destroying history to take booboos off of feelings is wrong.
 
The Russia collusion thing at this point is fiction created by the MSM. Not saying more couldn't come from it but its basically BS right now. CNN's own staff have been caught saying its BS.
The people who investigate it are more knowledgeable and topically informed than you.
We can both agree on that.
They say otherwise. You're wrong.
 
The people who investigate it are more knowledgeable and topically informed than you.
We can both agree on that.
They say otherwise. You're wrong.
Thats exactly why I said more could come from it, but right now, you're just dancing as the puppet master pulls your strings.
 
How come those statues only became such an issue when Trump was elected?
You can't be so stupid or willfully blind that you don't realize the whole SJW thing was happening LONG before Trump got elected.
It's disingenuous of you to pretend otherwise to convenience your personal politics.
 
You can't be so stupid or willfully blind that you don't realize the whole SJW thing was happening LONG before Trump got elected.
It's disingenuous of you to pretend otherwise to convenience your personal politics.
How come Obama didn't take 'em down?
 
Keep parroting that CNN narrative, Ouverpinnochio.
Ouverpinnochio?
OkVlrkw.jpg
 
So has the intelligence community.

You know, that agencies thingy that's full of people assessing threats, not threads. People who actively investigate these things, not Sherdog war roomers.

I think I'll trust the people that protect us with action, instead of Putin on rose-colored glasses.

And we all know the intelligence community is always on point when it comes to potential war starting information.

Very clean track record of transparency and honesty.
 
And we all know the intelligence community is always on point when it comes to potential war starting information.

Very clean track record of transparency and honesty.
More disingenuous argument, it's an attribution fallacy and not what I said or implied.
 
This is dishonest. It's not a matter of D vs R, dishonesty 1. It's reflective of social change, not anger at a political party. That's projection.
Dishonesty two follows immediately, that the conclusion has anything to do with the premise.

Dems are losing their minds, we all see it, there's nothing to argue.
 
She got naked in a movie a few years back. Her tits were super fucking tragic. My boner died that day.

<DCrying>

That photo and they way she is mashing her brewbs together are a lie!
They weren't that bad for a 41 year old woman with no work.
 
Dems are losing their minds, we all see it, there's nothing to argue.
I wouldn't argue that, other than to notice it's an oversimplification, but that's not what we're talking about.
We're talking about dishonest representation of another's position.
 
I wouldn't argue that, other than to notice it's an oversimplification, but that's not what we're talking about.
We're talking about dishonest representation of another's position.

Sure, it's a true oversimplification. Dem party is doing a rain dance to beat Drumph. Ooga booga orange meenie.

As for dishonest representations, I suggest you guys start a thread on it away from the inaccurate picture thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top