Social Meme Thread v119: God Memes It!

Status
Not open for further replies.
<thisgonbegood>

Oh I do love how him being rightfully acquitted makes people like you so asshurt

Owning the Libs, am I right?

Insane gun laws allow a civilian to walk through a city crowd with an assault rifle, unaccosted. If Kyle walked into a school or an airport with an AR15, he would be tackled or shot, but it's Kenosha so "it's ok"! In most parts of the world you would not be legally allowed to walk around in public with an assault rifle.

Innocent bystanders in a city crowd see an active shooter and attempt to subdue him (to stop him from harming anyone), and it's seen as the wrong response. Most people in a crowded public area would be engaging in fight or flight behavior upon seeing a random civilian wielding an assault rifle. Especially in the modern day climate of regularly occurring American mass shootings.

Kyle wielding an AR15 in a crowded public area being seen as "non-confrontational" and "not a threat" defies all common sense.

Maybe mass shooters should use this legal defense more often. Perp walked into school and teacher tried tackling him before he discharged firearm, therefore SELF DEFENCE.
 
Owning the Libs, am I right?

Insane gun laws allow a civilian to walk through a city crowd with an assault rifle, unaccosted. If Kyle walked into a school or an airport with an AR15, he would be tackled or shot, but it's Kenosha so "it's ok"! In most parts of the world you would not be legally allowed to walk around in public with an assault rifle.

Innocent bystanders in a city crowd see an active shooter and attempt to subdue him (to stop him from harming anyone), and it's seen as the wrong response. Most people in a crowded public area would be engaging in fight or flight behavior upon seeing a random civilian wielding an assault rifle. Especially in the modern day climate of regularly occurring American mass shootings.

Kyle wielding an AR15 in a crowded public area being seen as "non-confrontational" and "not a threat" defies all common sense.

Maybe mass shooters should use this legal defense more often. Perp walked into school and teacher tried tackling him before he discharged firearm, therefore SELF DEFENCE.


<Dany07>
 
Owning the Libs, am I right?

Insane gun laws allow a civilian to walk through a city crowd with an assault rifle, unaccosted. If Kyle walked into a school or an airport with an AR15, he would be tackled or shot, but it's Kenosha so "it's ok"! In most parts of the world you would not be legally allowed to walk around in public with an assault rifle.

So you think people have a right to assault other people because of what they have in their hands? Even when no one's in danger and there's no threat?

"It's okay to attack him because he had a gun" is the same argument as "it's okay to rape her because she was dressed provocatively." And I don't think that's a side you want to defend.

Innocent bystanders in a city crowd see an active shooter and attempt to subdue him (to stop him from harming anyone), and it's seen as the wrong response. Most people in a crowded public area would be engaging in fight or flight behavior upon seeing a random civilian wielding an assault rifle. Especially in the modern day climate of regularly occurring American mass shootings.

I don't think you know what "active shooter" means. I'll give you a hint - it sure doesn't mean walking slowly toward the police with your gun low. And the area wasn't crowded, either. It was a wide open, empty street that only became crowded because a mob took it upon themselves to chase Kyle down and attack him.

Kyle wielding an AR15 in a crowded public area being seen as "non-confrontational" and "not a threat" defies all common sense.

Maybe mass shooters should use this legal defense more often. Perp walked into school and teacher tried tackling him before he discharged firearm, therefore SELF DEFENCE.

The difference is that you're not allowed to be in a school with a firearm, so you're already breaking laws at that point. Much as you may want one, there's no law against holding a gun while you're outside. (And interestingly enough, I don't hear you, or many liberals, having an issue with Gaige Grosskreutz wielding and firing a handgun that he was not legally allowed to carry.)
 
Owning the Libs, am I right?

Insane gun laws allow a civilian to walk through a city crowd with an assault rifle, unaccosted. If Kyle walked into a school or an airport with an AR15, he would be tackled or shot, but it's Kenosha so "it's ok"! In most parts of the world you would not be legally allowed to walk around in public with an assault rifle.

Innocent bystanders in a city crowd see an active shooter and attempt to subdue him (to stop him from harming anyone), and it's seen as the wrong response. Most people in a crowded public area would be engaging in fight or flight behavior upon seeing a random civilian wielding an assault rifle. Especially in the modern day climate of regularly occurring American mass shootings.

Kyle wielding an AR15 in a crowded public area being seen as "non-confrontational" and "not a threat" defies all common sense.

Maybe mass shooters should use this legal defense more often. Perp walked into school and teacher tried tackling him before he discharged firearm, therefore SELF DEFENCE.

<{MingNope}>

Kyle did nothing wrong

It's not necessary for his defence but it's funny the three people shot just so happened to be a convicted nonce, a domestic abuser and a felon illegally carrying a firearm. Funny that
 
Last edited:
EeypNDC.jpeg

UkkSz2X.jpeg
 
I don't necessarily agree with that but it did make me laugh and at the end of the day that's what matters.


Same. I'm not hoping for rahowa but I thought it was humorous and that's what it made me think of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top