• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Social Meme Thread v105: Good Guy With a Meme

1zXMXdH.jpg
 
Stephen King: Go find censored material

@Horse Style: *shows meme of Macauley Culkin finding censored material as kids have always done*

Siver!: That makes no sense as a rebuttal

@Horse Style: YOU MISSED THE POINT! CENSORSHIP IS MY GOD!!!!!

900
Stephen King was taking the typical "muh book banning" viewpoint and implying it's because people are trying to hide something from the kids.

You didn't even understand the meme you posted

<Dany07>

Not to mention, the point of my response is asking why creeps like Stephen King weren't pushing this viewpoint back when boys wanted Playboys but is pushing this viewpoint very hard when it's LGBT creeps trying to get kids to read books that contain explicit sexual material. You misunderstood both your meme and my meme

hard-to-use-reason-and-logic.jpg
 
Stephen King was taking the typical "muh book banning" viewpoint and implying it's because people are trying to hide something from the kids.

Why would anyone ban books if they had nothing to hide?

40dce8650b0fbbe5f74a92fc1867cf5a.jpg


Who gives a shit what offends an old fart?

Or a young loon, for that matter?

People try to ban HP Lovecraft because he was racist.

So what?

GTFO banning shit. Let me read.

508edl.jpg
 
images


Literally you.
8qq89s.jpg


You don't even understand what the word "ban" means. You're easily one of the dumbest posters to ever post on Sherdog.

By your logic, cigarettes are banned because children aren't allowed to buy/smoke them. Driving a car is banned because people without permits/licenses can't drive them.
 
images


Literally you.
This makes no sense on multiple levels.

1. It makes no sense as a response to the argument you're having. So you are bad at discourse
2. I don't believe he ever cited the bible as a reason for children not to have access to smut. So you are bad at insulting
3. You presupposition seems to be one must be religious to think smut being accessible by children is a bad idea. So You are bad at logic
4. Thus, You, presumably are not religious so you must think that smut being accessible to children is a good idea. So You are pervert at best and a you know what that I can't say because the mods love this group more than any other
5. The bible is not a single book. But a collection of 66 books. So you are bad at cultural literacy
6. The bible is some of the most challenging and influential writing in the history of time. So you equating biblical literacy with stupidity is actually quite stupid and misses the mark
7. The meme itself makes no sense as previously discussed above. So, to no one's surprise, you (the left) can't meme.
8. You:


images
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,240,792
Messages
55,717,532
Members
174,911
Latest member
Yakuza13
Back
Top