Social Meme Thread v102: Fat Chicks in Party Hats

[BroRogan]

 

[idrankyourbeer]

 

[idrankyourbeer]

 

[idrankyourbeer]

 

[Batjester]

Not sure why, but this one cracked me up.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

 

[GearSolidMetal]

Cliffs : How to eliminate crime - Make everything legal.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

 

[Horse Style]

Cliffs : How to eliminate crime - Make everything legal.

So which crime on the books are "criminalizing culture" (these retards don't represent my culture)? Murder? Rape? Robbery? Which crimes are a part of "their culture"?

Every time these self-important pseudo-intellectuals, who think they represent black people, open their mouths, they embarrass black people.

 

[A Very Serious Cat]

Cliffs : How to eliminate crime - Make everything legal.

Sounds like the bullshit being posted by some people on here

 

[HockeyBjj]

This is somehow not a satire site

 

[Cherry Brigand]

This is somehow not a satire site

More like Rachel HOlezal! AMIRITE!?!

 

[650lb Sumo]

I remember hearing a joke like but can't remember who from: the Roman's are famous for conquering people and bringing them civilisation, they went around the world conquering and civilising, conquering and civilizing until they got to Scotland and thought errrrr... fuck it build a wall

It certainly is. Just ask the Ninth Legion.

Oh, wait...

I debunked this a few months ago, and @KnightTemplar participated in the conversation, and is now pretending that it didn't happen. Edit: Discussion in July

(1) The Romans conquered what is now Scotland.
(2) They did not proceed to occupy the country north of Edinburgh/Glasgow because it wasn't worth it (poor agricultural land and low population).
(3) Yes, Edinburgh/Glasgow, that's the Antonine Wall, which is north of southern Scotland.
(4) Hadrian's Wall is south of part of England but this is never mentioned by the kind of person who repeats these myths.
(5) There were lots of places the Romans didn't conquer. Ireland, for example. No one mentions those either.

(6) Most of the ancestors of the Scottish people came after the Romans left (conquering, in time, those who were already there).
(6) The 'The Ninth Legion disappeared in Scotland due to those crazy 'Scots'!' theory has been debunked.
(7) Note that the Scots were only one of the ethnic groups who went on to form the Scottish people today, and to call the Scottish people 'Scots' is wrong.
(8) Here are some excerpts from Wikipedia's page on the Battle of Mons Graupius, at which the combined army of the areas of Scotland not yet conquered was totally defeated, never again to face the Roman Army in open battle:

Spoiler

Estimates for the size of the Roman army range from 17,000 to 30,000... The Caledonian army... was said to be over 30,000 strong.

After a brief exchange of missiles, Agricola ordered auxiliaries to launch a frontal attack on the enemy. These were based around four cohorts of Batavians and two cohorts of Tungri swordsmen. The Caledonians were cut down and trampled on the lower slopes of the hill. Those at the top attempted an outflanking movement but were themselves outflanked by Roman cavalry. The Caledonians were then comprehensively routed and fled for the shelter of nearby woodland, but were relentlessly pursued by well-organised Roman units.

According to Tacitus, 10,000 Caledonian people died at a cost of only 360 auxiliary troops. 20,000 Caledonians retreated into the woods, where they fared considerably better against pursuing forces. Roman scouts were unable to locate the remaining Caledonian forces the next morning.

Edit: Meme:

 

[Roop Holstry]

More like Rachel HOlezal! AMIRITE!?!

Neck down isnt bad.

Neck up looks like Krusty the Clown

 

[A Very Serious Cat]

I debunked this a few months ago, and @KnightTemplar participated in the conversation, and is now pretending that it didn't happen.

(1) The Romans conquered what is now Scotland.
(2) They did not proceed to occupy the country north of Edinburgh/Glasgow because it wasn't worth it (poor agricultural land and low population).
(3) Yes, Edinburgh/Glasgow, that's the Antonine Wall, which is north of southern Scotland.
(4) Hadrian's Wall is south of part of England but this is never mentioned by the kind of person who repeats these myths.
(5) There were lots of places the Romans didn't conquer. Ireland, for example. No one mentions those either.

(6) Most of the ancestors of the Scottish people came after the Romans left (conquering, in time, those who were already there).
(6) The 'The Ninth Legion disappeared in Scotland due to those crazy 'Scots'!' theory has been debunked.
(7) Note that the Scots were only one of the ethnic groups who went on to form the Scottish people today, and to call the Scottish people 'Scots' is wrong.
(8) Here are some excerpts from Wikipedia's page on the Battle of Mons Graupius, at which the combined army of the areas of Scotland not yet conquered was totally defeated, never again to face the Roman Army in open battle:

Spoiler

Estimates for the size of the Roman army range from 17,000 to 30,000... The Caledonian army... was said to be over 30,000 strong.

After a brief exchange of missiles, Agricola ordered auxiliaries to launch a frontal attack on the enemy. These were based around four cohorts of Batavians and two cohorts of Tungri swordsmen. The Caledonians were cut down and trampled on the lower slopes of the hill. Those at the top attempted an outflanking movement but were themselves outflanked by Roman cavalry. The Caledonians were then comprehensively routed and fled for the shelter of nearby woodland, but were relentlessly pursued by well-organised Roman units.

According to Tacitus, 10,000 Caledonian people died at a cost of only 360 auxiliary troops. 20,000 Caledonians retreated into the woods, where they fared considerably better against pursuing forces. Roman scouts were unable to locate the remaining Caledonian forces the next morning.

Since we're being pedantic over jokes, beating them in a battle isn't the same as conquering. Of what I've read most of it was just the locals taking to the hills and waiting out the Roman armies

 

[650lb Sumo]

Since we're being pedantic over jokes, beating them in a battle isn't the same as conquering. Of what I've read most of it was just the locals taking to the hills and waiting out the Roman armies

Spoiler

Scotland was conquered by the Romans and it was conquered by the English as well. It would be better if you could just accept it and move forward but if you can't, well, you can't.

They didn't just wait though while the Romans were there, they did a bit of guerrilla warfare here and there. In those days, with the low population and technology, you can imagine it would be annoying to find food for tens of thousands of men and horses, with no fridges either to store it and only horses and carts to transport it, and march them around at 10-20 miles a day or whatever through rough terrain with rivers, lakes and hills everywhere with the enemy just running away, it would cost a fortune and the territory wouldn't come close to justifying the cost, there was very little to tax or take.

I'm afraid I'm out of memes, at least for the Overton Window on this site.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

Ratioooooo!!!!

 

[idrankyourbeer]

 

[Chad R. Thundercock]

More like Rachel HOlezal! AMIRITE!?!

Wow. That is a textbook definition of the word "butterface."

 

[Deleted member 592570]