You do know the only reason I've ever brought up historical figures is 100% down to posters talking about gay people "causing the collapse of western civilization" (lmao) on this forum, right? I'm just inclined to laugh at the irony of that sentiment being expressed on a computing device of all things; I may also point to the philosophical underpinning of the scientific revolution or note whom a large number of the most iconic pieces of artwork in the history of western culture is owed to. You seem to interpret it as some kind of superiority angle when it's more like unnecessary justification for mere existence.
In a similar way, I may note that the ('cis male') subdemo is pretty easily among the most economically successful capitalists in the US when we are conflated with communism and leftists; I'll point out that the "politicization of sexuality" actually happened centuries ago when countries created laws around it and that "Pride" came into existence as a direct counter to sociocultural shame and stigma; I've dropped scrollbombs of hard-bodied homo studs specifically because absurd OTT flamboyant caricatured stereotypes are invariably made out to be some sort of default representative.
The point being: It's almost entirely defensive, responsive, reactionary pushback to what I read and see on this particular platform, and even then I'm selective. It ain't that serious but I don't bring up and haven't posted any of that shit for no reason. There's also not exactly a surplus of insight, perspective or representation on that front here in general; in fact, there would otherwise be virtually none.
You do know the only reason I've ever brought up historical figures is 100% down to posters talking about gay people "causing the collapse of western civilization" (lmao) on this forum, right? I'm just inclined to laugh at the irony of that sentiment being expressed on a computing device of all things; I may also point to the philosophical underpinning of the scientific revolution or note whom a large number of the most iconic pieces of artwork in the history of western culture is owed to. You seem to interpret it as some kind of superiority angle when it's more like unnecessary justification for mere existence.
In a similar way, I may note that the ('cis male') subdemo is pretty easily among the most economically successful capitalists in the US when we are conflated with communism and leftists; I'll point out that the "politicization of sexuality" actually happened centuries ago when countries created laws around it and that "Pride" came into existence as a direct counter to sociocultural shame and stigma; I've dropped scrollbombs of hard-bodied homo studs specifically because absurd OTT flamboyant caricatured stereotypes are invariably made out to be some sort of default representative.
The point being: It's almost entirely defensive, responsive, reactionary pushback to what I read and see on this particular platform, and even then I'm selective. It ain't that serious but I don't bring up and haven't posted any of that shit for no reason. There's also not exactly a surplus of insight, perspective or representation on that front here in general; in fact, there would otherwise be virtually none.
I saw your post the first time and took it at face value. If you think the hypersexualized images of men you post are some type plea to common unity I'm not sure what to say.
Is there a reason you just hit me with the "nuke the entire site from orbit" of posts? I don't think most people believe homosexuality is the down turn of society outside of the genetic dead end. But hyper sexuality and especially that of hyper depraved nature seems to correlate strongly.
It's strange that anyone would consider a man's sexuality orientation while ranking mathematicians. I'm sorry to have immediately assumed that was your reasoning.
Are you talking about Alan Turing and computing devices?
I saw your post the first time and took it at face value. If you think the hypersexualized images of men you post are some type plea to common unity I'm not sure what to say.
Is there a reason you just hit me with the "nuke the entire site from orbit" of posts? I don't think most people believe homosexuality is the down turn of society outside of the genetic dead end. But hyper sexuality and especially that of hyper depraved nature seems to correlate strongly.
It's strange that anyone would consider a man's sexuality orientation while ranking mathematicians. I'm sorry to have immediately assumed that was your reasoning.
Are you talking about Alan Turing and computing devices?
It is so unbelievably sexy. I got to shoot one alongside a handful of other LMG/GPMG's out in Vegas a few years ago and fell in love.
Honestly, dude.
You do know the only reason I've ever brought up historical figures is 100% down to posters talking about gay people "causing the collapse of western civilization" (lmao) on this forum, right? I'm just inclined to laugh at the irony of that sentiment being expressed on a computing device of all things; I may also point to the philosophical underpinning of the scientific revolution or note whom a large number of the most iconic pieces of artwork in the history of western culture is owed to. You seem to interpret it as some kind of superiority angle when it's more like unnecessary justification for mere existence.
In a similar way, I may note that the ('cis male') subdemo is pretty easily among the most economically successful capitalists in the US when we are conflated with communism and leftists; I'll point out that the "politicization of sexuality" actually happened centuries ago when countries created laws around it and that "Pride" came into existence as a direct counter to sociocultural shame and stigma; I've dropped scrollbombs of hard-bodied homo studs specifically because absurd OTT flamboyant caricatured stereotypes are invariably made out to be some sort of default representative.
The point being: It's almost entirely defensive, responsive, reactionary pushback to what I read and see on this particular platform, and even then I'm selective. It ain't that serious but I don't bring up and haven't posted any of that shit for no reason. There's also not exactly a surplus of insight, perspective or representation on that front here in general; in fact, there would otherwise be virtually none.
I always wanted to go to the bullet or however it is spelled county Kentucky gin fair. I heard about being able to fire a mortor at a rowboat in a pond and they had an uzi walking target range. Plus they had a 50 cal
It’s pretty crazy. I was a metal worker for many years. I know it doesn’t take much for solid metal to weaken by heat (IE Acetylene torch). A friend of mine on FB posted a link to a ‘study’ saying that fires didn’t cause WTC 7 to collapse. I really wanted to point out that this ‘study’ was funded by conspiracy theories.
Violence/Genocide: Do not condone violence or genocide on a person or group of people. You are free to attack a person or groups ideas but you are crossing the line when calling for violence. This will be heavily enforced in threads with breaking news involving victims.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.