Mayweather trolled hard by Magomedsharipov

Zabit Magomedsharipov could quite literally kill Mayweather if he felt like doing it.

Which set of rules?

Because if its no rules I'm betting on Mayweather. He has more money, which can buy much better weapons (and people to use them for him) than a poorer guy has available.
 
Zabit Magomedsharipov could quite literally kill Mayweather if he felt like doing it.

Zabit would literally kill most of the UFC roster anywhere near his weight. He is the future king of 145.
 
Forget wrestling Mayweather would get destroyed in striking

It took him 8 rounds to beat fatigued Mcgregor in strict boxing rules, any decent strikers would KO Mayweather.

This is what I'm thinking as well.

I think that Conor might strike with him in the octagon just to prove a point, and it will be waaaaay easier than people might expect.

Conor might just spam different kicks and Floyd won't be able to defend shit.

It's a whole different sport...
 
Infinite insecurity.
What’s really funny is Floyd exerted his influence and has totally disrupted MMA, now it’s number one attraction doesn’t seem too eager to fight in MMA and interim title “fights” are now taking place. Funny I don’t see a jump in MMA viewership either. Floyd still renting space in MMA fans head, Boxing fans don’t even think about MMA fighters like the infinite insecurity shown around here.
 
This is what I'm thinking as well.

I think that Conor might strike with him in the octagon just to prove a point, and it will be waaaaay easier than people might expect.

Conor might just spam different kicks and Floyd won't be able to defend shit.

It's a whole different sport...

Wow, someone is butthurt and hasn't gotten over the fact that Floyd fucking destroyed McGregor...

Conor is supposed to be some amazing striker who has incredible power, yet he couldn't even hurt Floyd at all. Basically every boxer Floyd has fought have done more damage to him. Get over it. Conor is a weak puncher compared to 99% of boxers.
 
Wow, someone is butthurt and hasn't gotten over the fact that Floyd fucking destroyed McGregor...

Conor is supposed to be some amazing striker who has incredible power, yet he couldn't even hurt Floyd at all. Basically every boxer Floyd has fought have done more damage to him. Get over it. Conor is a weak puncher compared to 99% of boxers.

Why butthurt ? I don't identify with Conor like you do with Floyd lol. I'm just a fan.

No. He can't stand and bang with Floyd. He has to panic wrestle and try to end the fight like Couture vs Toney, or else, he is going to end up like Mercer vs Sylvia.

Chad Mendes was lighting Conor up something vicious. It wasn't even competitive, until Mendes gassed. LOL

Couture is a wrestler so ofc he will wrestle.

Sylvia was a fat faded version of himself, and even in prime he was not a striker anywhere near Conors level.

Conor will humiliate Floyd for the exact same reasons Floyd humiliated Conor. It's a totally different game.
 
Why butthurt ? I don't identify with Conor like you do with Floyd lol. I'm just a fan.
Couture is a wrestler so ofc he will wrestle.
Sylvia was a fat faded version of himself, and even in prime he was not a striker anywhere near Conors level.
Conor will humiliate Floyd for the exact same reasons Floyd humiliated Conor. It's a totally different game.
Mercer wasn't any better. Plus, Conor only has 48% striking accuracy and he only avoids 57% of strikes against him.

Tim Sylvia has 42% striking accuracy, but he has thrown 408 more strikes than Conor, and he has 61% striking defense.

Tim Sylvia and Conor McGregor are evenly matched strikers.
 
Nice, although Magomedsharipov could probably make more money working as Floyd's butler than he does fighting in the UFC.
Is it a place to talk about fights or did I click on any phishing link that took me to Forbes forum?
 
Mercer wasn't any better. Plus, Conor only has 48% striking accuracy and he only avoids 57% of strikes against him.

Tim Sylvia has 42% striking accuracy, but he has thrown 408 more strikes than Conor, and he has 61% striking defense.

Tim Sylvia and Conor McGregor are evenly matched strikers.

shoot-myself-meme-59de14f28a4b0.png
 
Why are you posting cartoons? I gave you some stats. LOL

Just because you believe Conor is better, it doesn't make it so. If the record doesn't match the "eye test" then we need to address it.

If Conor was really that great of a striker, his accuracy and defense would be better. He is only slightly above the UFC average (42% striking accuracy).
 
Which set of rules?

Because if its no rules I'm betting on Mayweather. He has more money, which can buy much better weapons (and people to use them for him) than a poorer guy has available.
Well, if said encounter takes place in Russia, all bets are off..

In seriousness, I'd imagine MMA rules was being assumed.
 
Mercer wasn't any better. Plus, Conor only has 48% striking accuracy and he only avoids 57% of strikes against him.

Tim Sylvia has 42% striking accuracy, but he has thrown 408 more strikes than Conor, and he has 61% striking defense.

Tim Sylvia and Conor McGregor are evenly matched strikers.
Yo wtf am I reading
 
Yo wtf am I reading
An opinion that is closer to the truth than whatever Kool-Aid induced fantasy you believe in.

The numbers I posted are straight from UFC.com. Nothing is made up.

Conor McGregor is a comparable striker to Tim Sylvia. They have very similar numbers. However, this is only descriptive statistics. We will need to conduct some inferential statistics to see if the difference in their numbers is statistically significant.

But, looking at how close their numbers are, my hypothesis will be that there is no statistically significant difference between their numbers.

If you have better evidence, show it. It is funny how many of you resort to (1) Insults, (2) Posting cartoons or (3) pretend being stupid, when somebody makes an argument using facts. LOL

I am giving you facts. So, instead of acting confused and illiterate, counter the facts. LOL
 
Why are you posting cartoons? I gave you some stats. LOL

Just because you believe Conor is better, it doesn't make it so. If the record doesn't match the "eye test" then we need to address it.

If Conor was really that great of a striker, his accuracy and defense would be better. He is only slightly above the UFC average (42% striking accuracy).

I'm here to have some light fun and maybe an interesting discussion here and there.

I'm not here to feed trolls.

I can't have a discussion with someone that claims Sylvia and McGregor at the same level in striking. That's just insanity.

Stat away my friend, you won't be doing it with me though :)
 
Well, if said encounter takes place in Russia, all bets are off..

In seriousness, I'd imagine MMA rules was being assumed.

Maybe, though the kind of money Mayweather has means being able to buy and arm backup anywhere in the world.

I thought MMA at first, but given the number of MMA guys wanting to box Mayweather I'm not so sure. Not that I blame them - even if you lose badly in the ring, getting paid millions would make it all worthwhile.
 
Back
Top