Social Matt Walsh has a weird diaper fetish...

gen·der
noun
1.
the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.

Does not compute. Sex is a biological marker.

Perhaps you can describe for me what a woman looks like?

After that, I'd like to know if transcultural is acceptable to you? IE is Rachel Dolezal black?

220px-Rachel_Dolezal_at_Spokane_Rally_cropped_2.jpg


Cul·ture

2. the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular nation, people, or other social group.
 
Last edited:
Way to carry water for a weirdo who thinks age of consent is too high...

And did you bother to do further research into that out-of-context quote? Hint - It was said back when he was a shock-jock radio host.

And I'm not carrying anyone's water. I'm destroying your laughably pathetic attack just by asking questions you can't answer, thus exposing your ignorance or lying about a political opponent.

His fans being weirdos doesn't excuse his weirdo diaper baby fetish

Say you have no clue about the name 'Sweet Baby Gang' without saying you have no clue about the name 'Sweet Baby Gang.'

<BidenShutIt>

And another thing you don't know : He has 6 kids including 2 newborns.

Name another diaper fetishist that has to change shit-filled diapers on a daily basis.
 
And did you bother to do further research into that out-of-context quote? Hint - It was said back when he was a shock-jock radio host.
God dam that's fucking disgusting...why are you defending again?
And I'm not carrying anyone's water. I'm destroying your laughably pathetic attack just by asking questions you can't answer, thus exposing your ignorance or lying about a political opponent.



Say you have no clue about the name 'Sweet Baby Gang' without saying you have no clue about the name 'Sweet Baby Gang.'

<BidenShutIt>

And another thing you don't know : He has 6 kids including 2 newborns.

Name another diaper fetishist that has to change shit-filled diapers on a daily basis.
 
The church is completely full of :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes. If a dude who thinks and talks about taboo sex and gender topics all day every day turned out to be a :eek::eek::eek::eek:, it wouldn't change anything I already think about the group he is in. Those mother fuckers love unearned authority.
 
Even if you consider it a mental illness, why is it necessary to dehumanize them?




Homophobia encompasses a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay or bisexual.[1][2][3] It has been defined as contempt, prejudice, aversion, hatred or antipathy, may be based on irrational fear and may sometimes be related to religious beliefs.

<Fedor23>

I call it like I see it. If that upsets trans or their supporters, tough shit.

Again, not afraid, just disgusted. There's a difference.
 
Far be it from me to yuck anyone else's yum so long as all parties are consenting, but I generally would have assumed someone with his hangups was a pretty weird guy behind closed doors.

I probably wouldn't have bet on homeoerotic Nazi diaper wrestling, but that's probably because it seems like somebody pulled four random kinks out of a hat. And to be fair as I can I'm just going to assume that the Nazi thing isn't part of the kink it's just the type of people he hangs out with making it incidental not integral.
 
Does not compute. Sex is a biological marker.

Perhaps you can describe for me what a woman looks like?

After that, I'd like to know if transcultural is acceptable to you? IE is Rachel Dolezal black?

220px-Rachel_Dolezal_at_Spokane_Rally_cropped_2.jpg


Cul·ture

2. the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular nation, people, or other social group.

It definitely computes, it's not that complicated. Sex and gender are not the same thing. Even you must understand this by now.

Race is also a social construct, Dolezal is free to identify however she pleases. A hundred years years ago I wouldn't have been considered white.
 
<Fedor23>

I call it like I see it. If that upsets trans or their supporters, tough shit.

Again, not afraid, just disgusted. There's a difference.

Sounds like you're a big fan of the N word.

Again, that's not how language works. Words have meaning and you're struggling with this one.
 
It definitely computes, it's not that complicated. Sex and gender are not the same thing. Even you must understand this by now.

Race is also a social construct, Dolezal is free to identify however she pleases. A hundred years years ago I wouldn't have been considered white.

So...here's the issue with this as I see it. I agree that people can identify however they want. That's part of living in a free society. It's not that where you get the pushback, it's when society is asked to cater to it, redefine norms, etc.

Like, if someone wants to identify as a man and they are biologically a woman, that's absolutely fine. If they want to identify as a baseball bat or gazelle or potted plant that's also fine. That's their choice. But we don't alter how society operates to cater to it.

Those are silly, extreme examples (the plant, gazelle, etc.) obviously but the Delezal one with race brings up a helluva lot of landmines doesn't it? If race is a social construct, okay...but we literally have laws and policy in place that takes this social construct into account. If universities are trying to be more diverse by adding black or latino students, should someone like Dolezal be allowed to simply check that box and increase their chances of getting in? If so, everyone could simply "identify" as black and the entire idea of Affirmative Action disappears.
 
Ugh I think we have another Steven crowder situation here.

Crowder might be the only with more red flags, of a "man" overcompensating for things about themselves, that's they don't like.
 
For sure. You know the more extreme they lean into proving how "manly" they are the more the opposite is true. Overcompensation at it's finest.

Matt Walsh is a true POS that can't help project his weird fantasies when engaging in his culture war bullshit. So pretty much a standard youtube conservative at this point.

You guys beat me to it. Well said.

Crowder might be the only with more red flags, of a "man" overcompensating for things about themselves, that's they don't like.
 
So...here's the issue with this as I see it. I agree that people can identify however they want. That's part of living in a free society. It's not that where you get the pushback, it's when society is asked to cater to it, redefine norms, etc.

Like, if someone wants to identify as a man and they are biologically a woman, that's absolutely fine. If they want to identify as a baseball bat or gazelle or potted plant that's also fine. That's their choice. But we don't alter how society operates to cater to it.

Those are silly, extreme examples (the plant, gazelle, etc.) obviously but the Delezal one with race brings up a helluva lot of landmines doesn't it? If race is a social construct, okay...but we literally have laws and policy in place that takes this social construct into account. If universities are trying to be more diverse by adding black or latino students, should someone like Dolezal be allowed to simply check that box and increase their chances of getting in? If so, everyone could simply "identify" as black and the entire idea of Affirmative Action disappears.

I never said there were simple solutions for some of the situations that can arise if we recognize gender identification. I don't really see race identification the same way, that's traditionally been applied by the observer not the individual. I don't think anyone is experiencing mental anguish and committing suicide because people aren't recognizing their racial ID. I also don't think someone should just check a box to be given an advantage set aside for a disadvantaged cohort.

I'm not certain about any of this stuff, like I said it isn't easy. I'm just thinking out loud and putting some ideas out there.
 
Typical liberal; when in doubt, cry, "RACISM!":rolleyes:

You've known me for years now and you know I don't say it often. Typical conservative handwaves accusations of racism by saying liberals make them too often.

I have a first cousin once removed who is both black and trans, the way you talk about trans people is obnoxious and offensive.
 
You've known me for years now and you know I don't say it often. Typical conservative handwaves accusations of racism by saying liberals make them too often.

I have a first cousin once removed who is both black and trans, the way you talk about trans people is obnoxious and offensive.

Well, I don't have any relatives, friends or acquaintances from that demographic. So it should be as understandable to you why I unapologetically don't give a shit, as it is to me why you defend trans rights.

You might not make such accusations regularly, but it's a go-to move for a lot of liberals. Although personally, I've always found it amusing; I've been accused of a lot worse than racism in my time*.

*Thank God they were never able to prove it wasn't suicide...;)
 
Back
Top